An Institutional Perspective on the Number of Stent Retriever Pass and Rate of Recanalization in Mechanical Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke: When to Stop?

Q3 Medicine
Bheru Dan Charan, Shailesh B. Gaikwad, Savyasachi Jain, Ajay Garg, Leve Joseph Devarajan Sebastian, M. P. Srivastava, Rohit Bhatia, Awadh Kishore Pandit, Shashank Sarad Kale
{"title":"An Institutional Perspective on the Number of Stent Retriever Pass and Rate of Recanalization in Mechanical Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke: When to Stop?","authors":"Bheru Dan Charan, Shailesh B. Gaikwad, Savyasachi Jain, Ajay Garg, Leve Joseph Devarajan Sebastian, M. P. Srivastava, Rohit Bhatia, Awadh Kishore Pandit, Shashank Sarad Kale","doi":"10.15388/amed.2024.31.1.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and purpose: Mechanical thrombectomy is the standard treatment modality for flow restoration in acute ischemic stroke. In cases of persistent occlusion, the optimal number of retrieval attempts before considering procedure termination is currently undetermined and is a topic for research. Therefore in this study, we studied the impact of the number of stent retrieval maneuvers on the recanalization of vessels.Methods: In this retrospective single-center observational study we included 52 patients with large vessel occlusion who underwent stent retriever mechanical thrombectomy. Successful recanalization rate was defined as modified TICI (Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction) 2b or 3.Result: The overall successful recanalization rate was 44.24%. The recanalization rate per stent retrieval attempt was the highest in 1st attempt (28.84%) and no recanalization was observed with the 3rd, 5th, and 6th attempts (p<0.001). At most 6 retrieval attempts were used.Conclusions: After two retrieval attempts, 91% of the patients were successfully recanalized and other after the 5th attempt could not result in recanalization.","PeriodicalId":34365,"journal":{"name":"Acta Medica Lituanica","volume":"3 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Medica Lituanica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15388/amed.2024.31.1.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose: Mechanical thrombectomy is the standard treatment modality for flow restoration in acute ischemic stroke. In cases of persistent occlusion, the optimal number of retrieval attempts before considering procedure termination is currently undetermined and is a topic for research. Therefore in this study, we studied the impact of the number of stent retrieval maneuvers on the recanalization of vessels.Methods: In this retrospective single-center observational study we included 52 patients with large vessel occlusion who underwent stent retriever mechanical thrombectomy. Successful recanalization rate was defined as modified TICI (Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction) 2b or 3.Result: The overall successful recanalization rate was 44.24%. The recanalization rate per stent retrieval attempt was the highest in 1st attempt (28.84%) and no recanalization was observed with the 3rd, 5th, and 6th attempts (p<0.001). At most 6 retrieval attempts were used.Conclusions: After two retrieval attempts, 91% of the patients were successfully recanalized and other after the 5th attempt could not result in recanalization.
从机构角度看急性缺血性脑卒中机械取栓术中的支架取出器通过次数和再通率:何时停止?
背景和目的:机械血栓切除术是急性缺血性卒中血流恢复的标准治疗方式。对于持续性闭塞的病例,在考虑终止手术之前,最佳的取栓尝试次数目前尚未确定,这也是一个研究课题。因此,在本研究中,我们研究了支架取出操作次数对血管再通畅的影响:在这项回顾性单中心观察研究中,我们纳入了 52 名接受支架取栓器机械血栓切除术的大血管闭塞患者。成功再通率定义为改良的 TICI(脑梗塞溶栓治疗)2b 或 3.结果:结果:总的成功再通率为 44.24%。每次支架取出尝试的再通率在第 1 次尝试中最高(28.84%),在第 3、5 和 6 次尝试中未观察到再通率(P<0.001)。最多使用了 6 次取栓尝试:结论:经过两次取栓尝试后,91%的患者成功再通,其他患者在第 5 次尝试后未能再通。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Medica Lituanica
Acta Medica Lituanica Medicine-General Medicine
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信