Ways of myth-making and their specifics (based on Umberto Eco’s literary and publicistic texts)

Pan-Art Pub Date : 2024-05-23 DOI:10.30853/pa20240016
Alyona Dmitrievna Fofanova, E. Zakablukovskiy
{"title":"Ways of myth-making and their specifics (based on Umberto Eco’s literary and publicistic texts)","authors":"Alyona Dmitrievna Fofanova, E. Zakablukovskiy","doi":"10.30853/pa20240016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study aims to identify the specifics of myth-making techniques that are comprehended and tested by the 20th- and 21st-century European philosopher Umberto Eco in his numerous publicistic and literary texts. As a result of the study, classifications of the “traditional” ways of myth-making (the reference to traditional mythologized archetypes, the use of binary oppositions, etc.) and the “modern” ways (double coding, depersonalization, discreteness of history, etc.), determined by the cultural and historical context of postmodernism and post-structuralism were provided. Using these classifications, the significance and influence of myth and myth-making techniques on thinking, human behavior, and cultural and historical processes of past and modern eras were proven. The paper is novel in that by analyzing the complex of Umberto Eco’s texts, myth is considered as the most important construct both of human culture and human thinking. The mechanisms of constructing certain types of modern myths, as well as the ways of their influence on the mass consciousness, on historical and socio-cultural processes are described.","PeriodicalId":365294,"journal":{"name":"Pan-Art","volume":"42 13","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pan-Art","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30853/pa20240016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study aims to identify the specifics of myth-making techniques that are comprehended and tested by the 20th- and 21st-century European philosopher Umberto Eco in his numerous publicistic and literary texts. As a result of the study, classifications of the “traditional” ways of myth-making (the reference to traditional mythologized archetypes, the use of binary oppositions, etc.) and the “modern” ways (double coding, depersonalization, discreteness of history, etc.), determined by the cultural and historical context of postmodernism and post-structuralism were provided. Using these classifications, the significance and influence of myth and myth-making techniques on thinking, human behavior, and cultural and historical processes of past and modern eras were proven. The paper is novel in that by analyzing the complex of Umberto Eco’s texts, myth is considered as the most important construct both of human culture and human thinking. The mechanisms of constructing certain types of modern myths, as well as the ways of their influence on the mass consciousness, on historical and socio-cultural processes are described.
创造神话的方式及其特殊性(根据翁贝托-艾柯的文学和宣传文本)
本研究旨在确定 20 世纪和 21 世纪欧洲哲学家翁贝托-艾柯在其众多宣传和文学文本中理解和检验的神话创作技巧的具体内容。研究的结果是,根据后现代主义和后结构主义的文化和历史背景,对 "传统 "的神话创造方式(对传统神话原型的引用、二元对立的使用等)和 "现代 "的神话创造方式(双重编码、非人格化、历史的离散性等)进行了分类。通过这些分类,证明了神话和神话制造技术对过去和现代的思维、人类行为以及文化和历史进程的意义和影响。本文的新颖之处在于,通过分析翁贝托-艾柯文本的复杂性,将神话视为人类文化和人类思维的最重要建构。论文描述了某些类型现代神话的构建机制,以及它们对大众意识、历史和社会文化进程的影响方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信