Impacts of wide row spacings on yield and yield components of upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)

IF 2 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY
Caitlyn B. Lawton, John L. Snider, Peng W. Chee, Sarah T. Hobby, Phillip M. Roberts, Amrit Pokhrel, Joshua M. Lee, Gurpreet K. Virk, Lavesta C. Hand
{"title":"Impacts of wide row spacings on yield and yield components of upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)","authors":"Caitlyn B. Lawton,&nbsp;John L. Snider,&nbsp;Peng W. Chee,&nbsp;Sarah T. Hobby,&nbsp;Phillip M. Roberts,&nbsp;Amrit Pokhrel,&nbsp;Joshua M. Lee,&nbsp;Gurpreet K. Virk,&nbsp;Lavesta C. Hand","doi":"10.1002/agj2.21579","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study quantifies the effects of wide row spacing on lint yield, yield components, and fiber quality of upland cotton (<i>Gossypium hirsutum</i> L.). An experiment was conducted in Tifton, GA in 2021 and 2022, where cotton was planted in six replications of 91-, 122-, 152-, and 183-cm row spacings. Following defoliation, 1.8 m was hand harvested from each plot, and boll density plant<sup>−1</sup> and density ha<sup>−1</sup> were determined for sympodial and monopodial branches. Additional measurements included fruit and lint yield distribution assessments and intra-boll yield components including seed cotton weight boll<sup>−1</sup>, seed index, seed boll<sup>−1</sup>, lint weight seed<sup>−1</sup>, seed surface area (SSA), fiber density, and single fiber weight. Lint yield was reduced 20% in the 183-cm row spacing compared to the 91-cm row spacing. The 91-cm rows had the lowest number of sympodial bolls plant<sup>−1</sup> with 152- and 183-cm rows demonstrating a 24%–28% increase in sympodial bolls plant<sup>−1</sup>. Sympodial bolls ha<sup>−1</sup> were reduced 22% in the 183-cm row spacing compared to the 91-cm row spacing. There were no differences in bolls ha<sup>−1</sup> or lint yield ha<sup>−1</sup> with respect to monopodial growth. There were no differences in seed cotton weight boll<sup>−1</sup>, seeds boll<sup>−1</sup>, fiber density, single fiber weight, or turnout. Seed index and SSA were increased in the 183-cm row spacing. Lint weight seed<sup>−1</sup> was reduced in the 91-cm row spacing.</p>","PeriodicalId":7522,"journal":{"name":"Agronomy Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/agj2.21579","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agronomy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/agj2.21579","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study quantifies the effects of wide row spacing on lint yield, yield components, and fiber quality of upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). An experiment was conducted in Tifton, GA in 2021 and 2022, where cotton was planted in six replications of 91-, 122-, 152-, and 183-cm row spacings. Following defoliation, 1.8 m was hand harvested from each plot, and boll density plant−1 and density ha−1 were determined for sympodial and monopodial branches. Additional measurements included fruit and lint yield distribution assessments and intra-boll yield components including seed cotton weight boll−1, seed index, seed boll−1, lint weight seed−1, seed surface area (SSA), fiber density, and single fiber weight. Lint yield was reduced 20% in the 183-cm row spacing compared to the 91-cm row spacing. The 91-cm rows had the lowest number of sympodial bolls plant−1 with 152- and 183-cm rows demonstrating a 24%–28% increase in sympodial bolls plant−1. Sympodial bolls ha−1 were reduced 22% in the 183-cm row spacing compared to the 91-cm row spacing. There were no differences in bolls ha−1 or lint yield ha−1 with respect to monopodial growth. There were no differences in seed cotton weight boll−1, seeds boll−1, fiber density, single fiber weight, or turnout. Seed index and SSA were increased in the 183-cm row spacing. Lint weight seed−1 was reduced in the 91-cm row spacing.

Abstract Image

宽行距对陆地棉(Gossypium hirsutum L.)产量和产量成分的影响
本研究量化了宽行距对陆地棉(Gossypium hirsutum L.)皮棉产量、产量成分和纤维质量的影响。2021 年和 2022 年在佐治亚州蒂夫顿进行了一项实验,棉花种植在 91 厘米、122 厘米、152 厘米和 183 厘米行距的六个重复中。落叶后,人工采收每个小区 1.8 米的棉花,并测定合生枝和单生枝的棉铃密度(株-1)和密度(公顷-1)。其他测量包括果实和皮棉产量分布评估以及棉铃内产量成分,包括籽棉重量(棉铃-1)、籽粒指数、籽粒重量(棉铃-1)、皮棉重量(籽粒-1)、籽粒表面积(SSA)、纤维密度和单纤维重量。与 91 厘米行距相比,183 厘米行距的皮棉产量降低了 20%。91 厘米行距的合生铃数最少,152 厘米和 183 厘米行距的合生铃数增加了 24%-28% 。与 91 厘米行距相比,183 厘米行距的每公顷交感结铃数减少了 22%。单峰生长的棉铃公顷-1 产量和皮棉公顷-1 产量没有差异。籽棉重量(每公顷-1)、籽粒(每公顷-1)、纤维密度、单纤维重量和纤度均无差异。行距为 183 厘米时,籽粒指数和 SSA 增加。行距为 91 厘米的棉花皮棉重籽-1 减少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Agronomy Journal
Agronomy Journal 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
9.50%
发文量
265
审稿时长
4.8 months
期刊介绍: After critical review and approval by the editorial board, AJ publishes articles reporting research findings in soil–plant relationships; crop science; soil science; biometry; crop, soil, pasture, and range management; crop, forage, and pasture production and utilization; turfgrass; agroclimatology; agronomic models; integrated pest management; integrated agricultural systems; and various aspects of entomology, weed science, animal science, plant pathology, and agricultural economics as applied to production agriculture. Notes are published about apparatus, observations, and experimental techniques. Observations usually are limited to studies and reports of unrepeatable phenomena or other unique circumstances. Review and interpretation papers are also published, subject to standard review. Contributions to the Forum section deal with current agronomic issues and questions in brief, thought-provoking form. Such papers are reviewed by the editor in consultation with the editorial board.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信