Analysis of an Aqueous Extract from Turkish Galls Based on Multicomponent Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis Combined with Network Pharmacology and Chemometric Analysis

IF 2.3 3区 化学 Q3 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
Ya Zeng, Lu Zhao, Meng Hao, Mirzat Maimaiti, Zhi Li, Minghui Zhang, Xuan Ma
{"title":"Analysis of an Aqueous Extract from Turkish Galls Based on Multicomponent Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis Combined with Network Pharmacology and Chemometric Analysis","authors":"Ya Zeng, Lu Zhao, Meng Hao, Mirzat Maimaiti, Zhi Li, Minghui Zhang, Xuan Ma","doi":"10.1155/2024/9962574","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The current quality control method for Turkish gall (TG) is limited to assessing total tannin or gallic acid (GA), which offers a basic level of quality control but does not fully capture the true quality of TG. Therefore, it is essential to establish a comprehensive method that utilizes multiple indicators to assess the intrinsic quality of TG. This research utilized UPLC-Q-TOF-MS/MS technology to qualitatively analyze the chemical composition of TG. Subsequently, the potential main active ingredients, targets, and pathways of TG in treating recurrent aphthous ulcers (RAU) were explored and analyzed using network pharmacology technology. Quantitative analysis of multicomponents by single marker (QAMS) was then employed to quantify the primary pharmacodynamic components in TG. Finally, chemometrics analysis was utilized to interpret the measured results and identify the markers of scavenging quality. The study identified 36 chemical components in TG, highlighting ellagic acid (EA), GA, and so on as key components in treating RAU. A method for simultaneously determining GA, EA, 1,2,3,6-tetra-O-galloyl-β-D-glucose (TEGG) and 1,2,3,4,6-penta-O-galloyl-β-D-glucose (PEGG) in TG was established. Statistical analysis revealed significant differences in the content of these 4 components across 14 batches of TG, with GA and PEGG identified as the primary contributors to the variations. This study determined a quality index for TG, providing a reference for quality evaluation and introducing a cost-effective and efficient quality control method. Furthermore, it addressed the challenge of developing new Chinese medicine by overcoming the lack of reference substances.","PeriodicalId":14974,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Analytical Methods in Chemistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Analytical Methods in Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/9962574","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The current quality control method for Turkish gall (TG) is limited to assessing total tannin or gallic acid (GA), which offers a basic level of quality control but does not fully capture the true quality of TG. Therefore, it is essential to establish a comprehensive method that utilizes multiple indicators to assess the intrinsic quality of TG. This research utilized UPLC-Q-TOF-MS/MS technology to qualitatively analyze the chemical composition of TG. Subsequently, the potential main active ingredients, targets, and pathways of TG in treating recurrent aphthous ulcers (RAU) were explored and analyzed using network pharmacology technology. Quantitative analysis of multicomponents by single marker (QAMS) was then employed to quantify the primary pharmacodynamic components in TG. Finally, chemometrics analysis was utilized to interpret the measured results and identify the markers of scavenging quality. The study identified 36 chemical components in TG, highlighting ellagic acid (EA), GA, and so on as key components in treating RAU. A method for simultaneously determining GA, EA, 1,2,3,6-tetra-O-galloyl-β-D-glucose (TEGG) and 1,2,3,4,6-penta-O-galloyl-β-D-glucose (PEGG) in TG was established. Statistical analysis revealed significant differences in the content of these 4 components across 14 batches of TG, with GA and PEGG identified as the primary contributors to the variations. This study determined a quality index for TG, providing a reference for quality evaluation and introducing a cost-effective and efficient quality control method. Furthermore, it addressed the challenge of developing new Chinese medicine by overcoming the lack of reference substances.
基于多组分定性定量分析结合网络药理学和化学计量学分析的土耳其瘿水提取物分析
目前土耳其胆(TG)的质量控制方法仅限于评估总单宁或没食子酸(GA),这虽然能提供基本的质量控制水平,但并不能完全反映土耳其胆的真实质量。因此,必须建立一种综合方法,利用多种指标来评估土耳其胆的内在质量。本研究利用 UPLC-Q-TOF-MS/MS 技术对传明酸的化学成分进行了定性分析。随后,利用网络药理学技术探索和分析了 TG 治疗复发性阿弗他溃疡(RAU)的潜在主要活性成分、靶点和途径。然后,采用单标记多成分定量分析(QAMS)来量化 TG 中的主要药效成分。最后,利用化学计量学分析来解释测量结果并确定清除质量的标志物。研究确定了 TG 中的 36 种化学成分,其中鞣花酸(EA)、GA 等是治疗 RAU 的关键成分。研究还建立了同时测定鞣花酸(GA)、鞣花酸(EA)、1,2,3,6-tetra-O-galloyl-β-D-glucose(TEGG)和 1,2,3,4,6-penta-O-galloyl-β-D-glucose(PEGG)的方法。统计分析表明,这 4 种成分的含量在 14 个批次的 TG 中存在显著差异,其中 GA 和 PEGG 是造成差异的主要因素。这项研究确定了 TG 的质量指标,为质量评估提供了参考,并引入了一种经济高效的质量控制方法。此外,该研究还克服了缺乏参照物质的难题,从而解决了开发新中药的难题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Analytical Methods in Chemistry
Journal of Analytical Methods in Chemistry CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL-ENGINEERING, CIVIL
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.80%
发文量
79
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Analytical Methods in Chemistry publishes papers reporting methods and instrumentation for chemical analysis, and their application to real-world problems. Articles may be either practical or theoretical. Subject areas include (but are by no means limited to): Separation Spectroscopy Mass spectrometry Chromatography Analytical Sample Preparation Electrochemical analysis Hyphenated techniques Data processing As well as original research, Journal of Analytical Methods in Chemistry also publishes focused review articles that examine the state of the art, identify emerging trends, and suggest future directions for developing fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信