Assessment of dental mobility in elderly and senile patients with various types of dentition defects

A. E. Dorofeev, A. V. Sevbitov, A. S. Utiuzh, S. N. Mironov, E. S. Emelina, M. Yu. Kuztetsova
{"title":"Assessment of dental mobility in elderly and senile patients with various types of dentition defects","authors":"A. E. Dorofeev, A. V. Sevbitov, A. S. Utiuzh, S. N. Mironov, E. S. Emelina, M. Yu. Kuztetsova","doi":"10.17816/pmj41296-103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective. To determine the differences in the degree of tooth mobility in elderly patients with various types of dentition defects. To establish and differentiate the degree of tooth mobility in relation to the type of dentition defect in elderly and senile patients. \nMaterials and methods. 500 patients aged 60 to 75 divided into 4 groups were examined. In the first group of patients, terminal defects were revealed (on one or both sides). The second group consisted of patients with included defects (on one or both sides). The third group was presented by combined defects (included and not included). Patients with single standing teeth constituted the fourth group. Patients with complete absence of teeth were excluded from the study. The assessment of dental mobility was carried out using the Periodotest device. All studies on dental mobility were conducted as part of the initial examination of the patient. To obtain objective data, periotestometry was performed 2 times in each patient. Average periotestometry data were calculated for each patient. The average readings of periotestometry for different groups of patients were determined. \nResults. On the basis of the data obtained while comparing the results of periotestometry, in relation to the type of dentition defect, statistically significant differences were established (p 0.001) (method used: the Kraskel – Wallis criteria). The results of periotestometry obtained in patients of group 4 were significantly higher than in representatives of other examined groups. The least mobility according to the results of periotestometry was observed in groups 2 and 3. \nConclusions. The study revealed significant differences in the degree of tooth mobility in relation to the type of dentition defect. In patients with single standing teeth, 2–3 degree of their mobility was determined, while patients with included defects had 1–2 degree of the mobility of existing teeth. The obtained data of periotestometry indicate the need to use unloading dentures in elderly patients, in order to preserve the remaining teeth in patients with single-standing teeth, as well as in patients with terminal defects of the dentition.","PeriodicalId":507221,"journal":{"name":"Perm Medical Journal","volume":"36 44","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perm Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17816/pmj41296-103","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective. To determine the differences in the degree of tooth mobility in elderly patients with various types of dentition defects. To establish and differentiate the degree of tooth mobility in relation to the type of dentition defect in elderly and senile patients. Materials and methods. 500 patients aged 60 to 75 divided into 4 groups were examined. In the first group of patients, terminal defects were revealed (on one or both sides). The second group consisted of patients with included defects (on one or both sides). The third group was presented by combined defects (included and not included). Patients with single standing teeth constituted the fourth group. Patients with complete absence of teeth were excluded from the study. The assessment of dental mobility was carried out using the Periodotest device. All studies on dental mobility were conducted as part of the initial examination of the patient. To obtain objective data, periotestometry was performed 2 times in each patient. Average periotestometry data were calculated for each patient. The average readings of periotestometry for different groups of patients were determined. Results. On the basis of the data obtained while comparing the results of periotestometry, in relation to the type of dentition defect, statistically significant differences were established (p 0.001) (method used: the Kraskel – Wallis criteria). The results of periotestometry obtained in patients of group 4 were significantly higher than in representatives of other examined groups. The least mobility according to the results of periotestometry was observed in groups 2 and 3. Conclusions. The study revealed significant differences in the degree of tooth mobility in relation to the type of dentition defect. In patients with single standing teeth, 2–3 degree of their mobility was determined, while patients with included defects had 1–2 degree of the mobility of existing teeth. The obtained data of periotestometry indicate the need to use unloading dentures in elderly patients, in order to preserve the remaining teeth in patients with single-standing teeth, as well as in patients with terminal defects of the dentition.
评估患有各种牙列缺损的老年患者的牙齿活动度
目的确定患有各种类型牙列缺损的老年患者牙齿活动度的差异。确定并区分老年和高龄患者牙齿活动度与牙列缺损类型的关系。材料和方法。将 500 名 60 至 75 岁的患者分为 4 组进行检查。第一组患者为末端缺损(单侧或双侧)。第二组是包含缺损的患者(单侧或双侧)。第三组是合并缺损(包括和不包括)的患者。第四组是单个立牙的患者。完全没有牙齿的患者被排除在研究之外。牙齿活动度的评估使用 Periodotest 设备进行。所有关于牙齿活动度的研究都是在对患者进行初步检查时进行的。为获得客观数据,对每位患者进行了两次牙周测试。计算每位患者的平均牙周测试数据。确定不同组别患者的牙周测量平均读数。结果。根据所获得的数据,比较牙周测量结果与牙列缺损类型的关系,发现两者之间存在显著的统计学差异(P 0.001)(采用的方法:Kraskel - Wallis 标准)。第 4 组患者的牙周测量结果明显高于其他检查组。根据周径测量结果,第 2 组和第 3 组的活动度最小。结论研究显示,牙齿活动度与牙列缺损类型的关系存在明显差异。在单个立牙的患者中,牙齿的活动度为 2-3 度,而在包含缺损的患者中,现有牙齿的活动度为 1-2 度。所获得的牙周测试数据表明,有必要在老年患者中使用卸荷假牙,以保护单立牙患者和牙列终末缺损患者的剩余牙齿。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书