Organic amendments improved soil properties and native plants’ performance in an Australian degraded land

IF 1.2 4区 农林科学 Q4 SOIL SCIENCE
Soil Research Pub Date : 2024-05-23 DOI:10.1071/sr22252
Jonas Larsen, Mehran Rezaei Rashti, M. Esfandbod, Chengrong Chen
{"title":"Organic amendments improved soil properties and native plants’ performance in an Australian degraded land","authors":"Jonas Larsen, Mehran Rezaei Rashti, M. Esfandbod, Chengrong Chen","doi":"10.1071/sr22252","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Context Land degradation poses a substantial threat to both the sustainable environment and human health. Efforts towards rehabilitation and remediation often require addition of soil amendments and careful selection of plant species. Aims We assessed the effect of recycled organic amendments on improvement of soil physicochemical properties and performance of native plant species in an Australian degraded soil. Methods A glasshouse pot experiment investigated the effects of compost (CO), biochar (BC), and compost-biochar (COBC) mixture on performance of three native Australian plant species (Eucalyptus tereticornis (EU), Acacia leiocalyx (AC), and Banksia integrifolia (BA)) in a degraded soil. Key results Application of CO, BC, and COBC organic amendments increased soil dissolved organic carbon and microbial biomass carbon contents compared to the control treatment. COBC amendment increased nutrient retention and reduced CO2 emissions compared to CO amendment. BC amendment also resulted in low CO2 emissions similar to the control treatment, where no significant differences were observed. AC outperformed the EU and BA species in biomass production due to its leguminous nature, with amendment application had an insignificant effect on AC performance. Within the EU treatments, the COBC:EU demonstrated the highest biomass production, followed by CO:EU, BC:EU, and CK:EU, respectively. Conclusion All amendments exhibited overall improvements in soil and plant parameters, with more significant outcomes observed with COBC application. However, the observed improvements from biochar application were minimal in this short-term experiment, which may not have allowed for the manifestation of long-term benefits. Implications Further research is warranted to investigate the effects of compost and biochar amendments on diverse soil types and native plant species.","PeriodicalId":21818,"journal":{"name":"Soil Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/sr22252","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context Land degradation poses a substantial threat to both the sustainable environment and human health. Efforts towards rehabilitation and remediation often require addition of soil amendments and careful selection of plant species. Aims We assessed the effect of recycled organic amendments on improvement of soil physicochemical properties and performance of native plant species in an Australian degraded soil. Methods A glasshouse pot experiment investigated the effects of compost (CO), biochar (BC), and compost-biochar (COBC) mixture on performance of three native Australian plant species (Eucalyptus tereticornis (EU), Acacia leiocalyx (AC), and Banksia integrifolia (BA)) in a degraded soil. Key results Application of CO, BC, and COBC organic amendments increased soil dissolved organic carbon and microbial biomass carbon contents compared to the control treatment. COBC amendment increased nutrient retention and reduced CO2 emissions compared to CO amendment. BC amendment also resulted in low CO2 emissions similar to the control treatment, where no significant differences were observed. AC outperformed the EU and BA species in biomass production due to its leguminous nature, with amendment application had an insignificant effect on AC performance. Within the EU treatments, the COBC:EU demonstrated the highest biomass production, followed by CO:EU, BC:EU, and CK:EU, respectively. Conclusion All amendments exhibited overall improvements in soil and plant parameters, with more significant outcomes observed with COBC application. However, the observed improvements from biochar application were minimal in this short-term experiment, which may not have allowed for the manifestation of long-term benefits. Implications Further research is warranted to investigate the effects of compost and biochar amendments on diverse soil types and native plant species.
有机添加剂改善了澳大利亚退化土地的土壤特性和本地植物的表现
背景 土地退化对可持续环境和人类健康都构成了巨大威胁。恢复和补救工作通常需要添加土壤改良剂和精心选择植物物种。目的 我们评估了澳大利亚退化土壤中回收的有机添加剂对改善土壤理化性质和本地植物物种表现的影响。方法 通过玻璃温室盆栽实验,研究堆肥(CO)、生物炭(BC)和堆肥-生物炭混合物(COBC)对三种澳大利亚本地植物物种(桉树(EU)、金合欢(AC)和银杏(BA))在退化土壤中表现的影响。主要结果 与对照处理相比,施用 CO、BC 和 COBC 有机添加剂增加了土壤溶解有机碳和微生物生物量碳含量。与 CO 改良剂相比,COBC 改良剂提高了养分保持率,减少了二氧化碳排放量。BC 添加剂也减少了二氧化碳排放量,与对照处理类似,没有观察到显著差异。AC 因其豆科植物的特性,在生物量生产方面优于欧盟和 BA 物种,但施用添加剂对 AC 的表现影响不大。在 EU 处理中,COBC:EU 的生物量产量最高,其次分别是 CO:EU、BC:EU 和 CK:EU。结论 所有改良剂都能全面改善土壤和植物参数,其中 COBC 的应用效果更为显著。不过,在这项短期实验中,施用生物炭的改善效果微乎其微,可能无法体现长期效益。启示 需要进一步研究堆肥和生物炭添加剂对不同土壤类型和本地植物物种的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Soil Research
Soil Research SOIL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
6.20%
发文量
35
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: Soil Research (formerly known as Australian Journal of Soil Research) is an international journal that aims to rapidly publish high-quality, novel research about fundamental and applied aspects of soil science. As well as publishing in traditional aspects of soil biology, soil physics and soil chemistry across terrestrial ecosystems, the journal welcomes manuscripts dealing with wider interactions of soils with the environment. Soil Research is published with the endorsement of the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) and the Australian Academy of Science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信