Assessing the Good Lives Model in the Japanese Context: Findings from the Primary Human Goods Survey of Incarcerated People and General Population in Japan

IF 1.8 4区 社会学 Q2 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Ikuo Aizawa, Tomoya Mukai, Yui Fukushima, Shigeru Iriyama
{"title":"Assessing the Good Lives Model in the Japanese Context: Findings from the Primary Human Goods Survey of Incarcerated People and General Population in Japan","authors":"Ikuo Aizawa,&nbsp;Tomoya Mukai,&nbsp;Yui Fukushima,&nbsp;Shigeru Iriyama","doi":"10.1007/s11417-024-09425-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Offender rehabilitation is of public and political importance in Japan. The Good Lives Model (GLM) and risk need responsivity (RNR) are the most influential frameworks used to support offender rehabilitation. However, the GLM has had a negligible impact on practice in Japan despite its importance being broadly understood. We conducted this preliminary study using two surveys—one with 133 inmates and one with 133 members of the general public—to assess the GLM’s applicability in Japan. The following questions were used with both groups: To what extent do the Japanese people pursue primary human goods (PHGs), and how does that differ between the general population and prison inmates? Has attaining PHGs been more difficult for prison inmates compared to the general population? The responses were analysed after adjusting for demographic data. The findings indicate that (1) in Japan, both inmates and the general public pursued PHGs, although the importance of all PHGs was significantly higher for inmates; (2) prison inmates had significantly greater difficulty than the general public in attaining certain PHGs in the past; and (3) the importance of future PHGs was significantly higher for all PHGs for inmates than for the general public. These results suggested that the premise of the GLM is relevant in Japan.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45526,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Criminology","volume":"19 2","pages":"225 - 237"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Criminology","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11417-024-09425-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Offender rehabilitation is of public and political importance in Japan. The Good Lives Model (GLM) and risk need responsivity (RNR) are the most influential frameworks used to support offender rehabilitation. However, the GLM has had a negligible impact on practice in Japan despite its importance being broadly understood. We conducted this preliminary study using two surveys—one with 133 inmates and one with 133 members of the general public—to assess the GLM’s applicability in Japan. The following questions were used with both groups: To what extent do the Japanese people pursue primary human goods (PHGs), and how does that differ between the general population and prison inmates? Has attaining PHGs been more difficult for prison inmates compared to the general population? The responses were analysed after adjusting for demographic data. The findings indicate that (1) in Japan, both inmates and the general public pursued PHGs, although the importance of all PHGs was significantly higher for inmates; (2) prison inmates had significantly greater difficulty than the general public in attaining certain PHGs in the past; and (3) the importance of future PHGs was significantly higher for all PHGs for inmates than for the general public. These results suggested that the premise of the GLM is relevant in Japan.

评估日本背景下的美好生活模式:日本被监禁者和普通民众的初级人类商品调查的结果
罪犯改造在日本具有重要的公共和政治意义。美好生活模式(GLM)和风险需求响应(RNR)是用于支持罪犯改造的最有影响力的框架。然而,尽管人们广泛了解 "美好生活模式 "的重要性,但它对日本实践的影响却微乎其微。我们通过两项调查进行了这项初步研究,一项是针对133名囚犯的调查,另一项是针对133名普通民众的调查,以评估GLM在日本的适用性。两组调查都使用了以下问题:日本人在多大程度上追求基本人类商品(PHGs),普通民众和囚犯在这方面有何不同?与普通人相比,监狱囚犯实现 PHGs 是否更加困难?在对人口数据进行调整后,对回答进行了分析。研究结果表明:(1) 在日本,囚犯和普通民众都在追求 "健康目标",但囚犯对所有 "健康目标 "的重视程度明显高于普通民众;(2) 监狱囚犯在过去实现某些 "健康目标 "的难度明显高于普通民众;(3) 囚犯对未来所有 "健康目标 "的重视程度明显高于普通民众。这些结果表明,GLM 的前提在日本是适用的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Asian Journal of Criminology
Asian Journal of Criminology CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
10.50%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: Electronic submission now possible! Please see the Instructions for Authors. For general information about this new journal please contact the publisher at [welmoed.spahr@springer.com] The Asian Journal of Criminology aims to advance the study of criminology and criminal justice in Asia, to promote evidence-based public policy in crime prevention, and to promote comparative studies about crime and criminal justice. The Journal provides a platform for criminologists, policymakers, and practitioners and welcomes manuscripts relating to crime, crime prevention, criminal law, medico-legal topics and the administration of criminal justice in Asian countries. The Journal especially encourages theoretical and methodological papers with an emphasis on evidence-based, empirical research addressing crime in Asian contexts. It seeks to publish research arising from a broad variety of methodological traditions, including quantitative, qualitative, historical, and comparative methods. The Journal fosters a multi-disciplinary focus and welcomes manuscripts from a variety of disciplines, including criminology, criminal justice, law, sociology, psychology, forensic science, social work, urban studies, history, and geography.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信