The Sustainability Walk – Combining Nudging and Pragmatism to Facilitate Collective Action and Reflection

M. Westin, S. Joosse, Fanny Möckel, Joakim Lindmarker, Robert Österbergh
{"title":"The Sustainability Walk – Combining Nudging and Pragmatism to Facilitate Collective Action and Reflection","authors":"M. Westin, S. Joosse, Fanny Möckel, Joakim Lindmarker, Robert Österbergh","doi":"10.58235/sjpa.2023.14134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Nudging is increasingly used in the design and planning of houses, neighbourhoods and districts with the intention to promote sustainable behaviour. Nudging, when used well, can serve as a tool for changing individuals’ behaviour, but it cannot, nor has it been designed to, facilitate the critical thinking and collective action needed to address urgent sustainability challenges.\nThe purpose of this study is to investigate how pragmatism’s interest in social interactions can complement nudging’s focus on individual behaviour. To test these ideas in practice, we develop an approach for planning that combines the two modes of thinking - The Sustainability Walk - to be used in the planning of places that are to promote sustainable everyday practices. We draw lessons from developing The Sustainability Walk by using the learning history method and participant observation.  \nWe find that pragmatism offers possibilities to amend nudging’s focus on individual behaviour by providing tools for forming a community of inquiry consisting of experts as well as citizens. However, we also learn that planning cultures of conflict avoidance, hinder the practical application of the idea of such pragmatist inquiry across different ways of knowing.","PeriodicalId":31772,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Public Administration","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Public Administration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58235/sjpa.2023.14134","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Nudging is increasingly used in the design and planning of houses, neighbourhoods and districts with the intention to promote sustainable behaviour. Nudging, when used well, can serve as a tool for changing individuals’ behaviour, but it cannot, nor has it been designed to, facilitate the critical thinking and collective action needed to address urgent sustainability challenges. The purpose of this study is to investigate how pragmatism’s interest in social interactions can complement nudging’s focus on individual behaviour. To test these ideas in practice, we develop an approach for planning that combines the two modes of thinking - The Sustainability Walk - to be used in the planning of places that are to promote sustainable everyday practices. We draw lessons from developing The Sustainability Walk by using the learning history method and participant observation.   We find that pragmatism offers possibilities to amend nudging’s focus on individual behaviour by providing tools for forming a community of inquiry consisting of experts as well as citizens. However, we also learn that planning cultures of conflict avoidance, hinder the practical application of the idea of such pragmatist inquiry across different ways of knowing.
可持续发展之路--将倡导与实用主义相结合,促进集体行动和反思
在房屋、社区和地区的设计和规划中,越来越多地使用 "激励",以促进可持续行为。如果使用得当,"引导 "可以作为改变个人行为的工具,但它不能,也没有被设计用来促进应对紧迫的可持续发展挑战所需的批判性思维和集体行动。本研究的目的是探讨实用主义对社会互动的兴趣如何与 "引导 "对个人行为的关注相辅相成。为了在实践中检验这些想法,我们开发了一种结合两种思维模式的规划方法--"可持续发展之路",用于促进可持续日常实践的场所规划。我们在开发 "可持续发展之路 "的过程中,利用学习历史法和参与观察法总结了经验教训。 我们发现,实用主义为形成一个由专家和公民组成的探究社区提供了工具,从而为修正 "引导 "对个人行为的关注提供了可能性。然而,我们也了解到,避免冲突的规划文化阻碍了这种实用主义探究理念在不同认知方式中的实际应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
52 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信