Intelligence and cortical morphometry: caveats in brain-behavior associations.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 ANATOMY & MORPHOLOGY
Brain Structure & Function Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-25 DOI:10.1007/s00429-024-02792-6
John D Lewis, Vandad Imani, Jussi Tohka
{"title":"Intelligence and cortical morphometry: caveats in brain-behavior associations.","authors":"John D Lewis, Vandad Imani, Jussi Tohka","doi":"10.1007/s00429-024-02792-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>It is well-established that brain size is associated with intelligence. But the relationship between cortical morphometric measures and intelligence is unclear. Studies have produced conflicting results or no significant relations between intelligence and cortical morphometric measures such as cortical thickness and peri-cortical contrast. This discrepancy may be due to multicollinearity amongst the independent variables in a multivariate regression analysis, or a failure to fully account for the relationship between brain size and intelligence in some other way. Our study shows that neither cortical thickness nor peri-cortical contrast reliably improves IQ prediction accuracy beyond what is achieved with brain volume alone. We show this in multiple datasets, with child data, developmental data, and with adult data; we show this with data acquired either at multiple sites, or at a single site; we show this with data acquired with different MRI scanner manufacturers, or with all data acquired on a single scanner; and we show this with fluid intelligence, full-scale IQ, performance IQ, and verbal IQ. But our point is not really even about IQ; rather we proffer a methodological caveat and potential explanation of the discrepancies in previous results, and which applies broadly.</p>","PeriodicalId":9145,"journal":{"name":"Brain Structure & Function","volume":" ","pages":"1417-1432"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11176253/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain Structure & Function","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-024-02792-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANATOMY & MORPHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

It is well-established that brain size is associated with intelligence. But the relationship between cortical morphometric measures and intelligence is unclear. Studies have produced conflicting results or no significant relations between intelligence and cortical morphometric measures such as cortical thickness and peri-cortical contrast. This discrepancy may be due to multicollinearity amongst the independent variables in a multivariate regression analysis, or a failure to fully account for the relationship between brain size and intelligence in some other way. Our study shows that neither cortical thickness nor peri-cortical contrast reliably improves IQ prediction accuracy beyond what is achieved with brain volume alone. We show this in multiple datasets, with child data, developmental data, and with adult data; we show this with data acquired either at multiple sites, or at a single site; we show this with data acquired with different MRI scanner manufacturers, or with all data acquired on a single scanner; and we show this with fluid intelligence, full-scale IQ, performance IQ, and verbal IQ. But our point is not really even about IQ; rather we proffer a methodological caveat and potential explanation of the discrepancies in previous results, and which applies broadly.

Abstract Image

智力与皮层形态测量:大脑与行为关联的注意事项。
大脑大小与智力有关,这一点已得到公认。但皮质形态测量与智力之间的关系还不清楚。研究结果相互矛盾,或者智力与皮层形态测量(如皮层厚度和皮层周围对比度)之间没有显著关系。造成这种差异的原因可能是多元回归分析中的自变量之间存在多重共线性,也可能是大脑大小与智力之间的关系未能通过其他方式得到充分解释。我们的研究表明,无论是皮层厚度还是皮层周围对比度,都不能可靠地提高智商预测的准确性,而只能通过脑容量来提高准确性。我们在多个数据集(包括儿童数据、发育数据和成人数据)中证明了这一点;我们在多个地点或单一地点获得的数据中证明了这一点;我们在不同磁共振成像扫描仪制造商获得的数据中证明了这一点,或在单一扫描仪获得的所有数据中证明了这一点;我们在流体智力、全面智商、表现智商和言语智商中证明了这一点。但是,我们的观点甚至与智商无关;相反,我们提出了一个方法上的注意事项,并对以往结果中的差异做出了可能的解释,这在很大程度上也适用于我们的观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Brain Structure & Function
Brain Structure & Function 医学-解剖学与形态学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
6.50%
发文量
168
审稿时长
8 months
期刊介绍: Brain Structure & Function publishes research that provides insight into brain structure−function relationships. Studies published here integrate data spanning from molecular, cellular, developmental, and systems architecture to the neuroanatomy of behavior and cognitive functions. Manuscripts with focus on the spinal cord or the peripheral nervous system are not accepted for publication. Manuscripts with focus on diseases, animal models of diseases, or disease-related mechanisms are only considered for publication, if the findings provide novel insight into the organization and mechanisms of normal brain structure and function.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信