{"title":"Frailty assessments and changes in frailty over time in elderly veteran Kidney Transplant candidates: Effects on transplant evaluations","authors":"Cassie Cederberg , Cara Joyce , Manpreet Samra , Anuradha Wadhwa , Rupunder Sodhi , Oswaldo Aguirre , Reynold I. Lopez-Soler","doi":"10.1016/j.tpr.2024.100153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and hypothesis</h3><p>Frailty has emerged as an important factor in the pre-transplant evaluation process as studies have shown that it is associated with increased waitlist mortality, lower rates of transplant listing, and higher rates of delisting. There have not been many studies on frailty in elderly pre-transplant patients. In this study, we determined the common frailty phenotypes in an elderly population, and its effects on transplant success.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Over a 3-year period, frailty was determined for all patients evaluated at our center. Patient characteristics were summarized using descriptive statistics, overall and by level of frailty. Differences in patient characteristics by level of frailty were assessed for statistical significance using analysis of variance for age and chi-square or Fisher's exact test. Transplant outcomes such as listing success, transplant rates and post-transplant outcomes were tied to initial frailty assessments as well as the changes in frailty over time.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 375 patients were evaluated over the study period. The mean age was 64±9 years. African American patients were less likely to be frail. After adjusting for age and race, the most significant predictors of listing were the walk test (aOR: 0.42, 95 % CI: 0.22–0.79) and physical activity (aOR: 0.45, 95 % CI: 0.28–0.74). A total of 30 patients (8 %) with a pre-listing frailty evaluation died prior to transplantation. Frail walk test and physical activity assessment led to a 2-fold increase in pre-transplant mortality (7 % vs 17 %; 6 % vs 13 %).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Our study is the first to focus on a purely geriatric population and shows the importance of frailty on listing success, transplant rates and mortality prior to listing. These data point to the need for the development of tools to target frailty as a guide for improving transplant success in elderly patients.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37786,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation Reports","volume":"9 3","pages":"Article 100153"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451959624000040/pdfft?md5=302b1753c9f4dcb93d8943354186eddd&pid=1-s2.0-S2451959624000040-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplantation Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451959624000040","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and hypothesis
Frailty has emerged as an important factor in the pre-transplant evaluation process as studies have shown that it is associated with increased waitlist mortality, lower rates of transplant listing, and higher rates of delisting. There have not been many studies on frailty in elderly pre-transplant patients. In this study, we determined the common frailty phenotypes in an elderly population, and its effects on transplant success.
Methods
Over a 3-year period, frailty was determined for all patients evaluated at our center. Patient characteristics were summarized using descriptive statistics, overall and by level of frailty. Differences in patient characteristics by level of frailty were assessed for statistical significance using analysis of variance for age and chi-square or Fisher's exact test. Transplant outcomes such as listing success, transplant rates and post-transplant outcomes were tied to initial frailty assessments as well as the changes in frailty over time.
Results
A total of 375 patients were evaluated over the study period. The mean age was 64±9 years. African American patients were less likely to be frail. After adjusting for age and race, the most significant predictors of listing were the walk test (aOR: 0.42, 95 % CI: 0.22–0.79) and physical activity (aOR: 0.45, 95 % CI: 0.28–0.74). A total of 30 patients (8 %) with a pre-listing frailty evaluation died prior to transplantation. Frail walk test and physical activity assessment led to a 2-fold increase in pre-transplant mortality (7 % vs 17 %; 6 % vs 13 %).
Conclusion
Our study is the first to focus on a purely geriatric population and shows the importance of frailty on listing success, transplant rates and mortality prior to listing. These data point to the need for the development of tools to target frailty as a guide for improving transplant success in elderly patients.
期刊介绍:
To provide to national and regional audiences experiences unique to them or confirming of broader concepts originating in large controlled trials. All aspects of organ, tissue and cell transplantation clinically and experimentally. Transplantation Reports will provide in-depth representation of emerging preclinical, impactful and clinical experiences. -Original basic or clinical science articles that represent initial limited experiences as preliminary reports. -Clinical trials of therapies previously well documented in large trials but now tested in limited, special, ethnic or clinically unique patient populations. -Case studies that confirm prior reports but have occurred in patients displaying unique clinical characteristics such as ethnicities or rarely associated co-morbidities. Transplantation Reports offers these benefits: -Fast and fair peer review -Rapid, article-based publication -Unrivalled visibility and exposure for your research -Immediate, free and permanent access to your paper on Science Direct -Immediately citable using the article DOI