Mind the Gap: Sexual Orientation Wage Gaps for Non-White and Immigrant Minorities in the United States.

IF 2.4 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Journal of Homosexuality Pub Date : 2025-04-16 Epub Date: 2024-05-24 DOI:10.1080/00918369.2024.2356835
Shannon V T L Mok
{"title":"Mind the Gap: Sexual Orientation Wage Gaps for Non-White and Immigrant Minorities in the United States.","authors":"Shannon V T L Mok","doi":"10.1080/00918369.2024.2356835","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A growing body of literature has found that sexual orientation and gender impact labor market outcomes, including earnings. This literature generally finds that gay and bisexual men earn less than heterosexual men. Despite being the highest earners among women, lesbians earn less than heterosexual men, and bisexual women earn the least. Far less research has explored intersectional disadvantages/advantages of being a lesbian, gay, or bisexual (LGB) individual and belonging to other minority groups. Using data from the 2013 to 2018 US National Health Interview Survey, this paper explores whether being an LGB racial minority or LGB immigrant results in cumulative earning disadvantages/advantages. This study finds that regardless of race or immigrant status, gay men's earnings did not statistically differ from white/US-born heterosexual men's earnings. For white and US-born women, their earnings followed the same pattern, with lesbians earning the most, followed by heterosexual women, then bisexuals; however, for nonwhite women, bisexuals earned the most and lesbians earned the least. The results for immigrant sexual minorities were not statistically significant. These findings suggest that disadvantage/advantage is multilayered-sexual minorities who occupy multiple minority positions may experience different levels of disadvantage/advantage.</p>","PeriodicalId":48221,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Homosexuality","volume":" ","pages":"890-913"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Homosexuality","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2024.2356835","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A growing body of literature has found that sexual orientation and gender impact labor market outcomes, including earnings. This literature generally finds that gay and bisexual men earn less than heterosexual men. Despite being the highest earners among women, lesbians earn less than heterosexual men, and bisexual women earn the least. Far less research has explored intersectional disadvantages/advantages of being a lesbian, gay, or bisexual (LGB) individual and belonging to other minority groups. Using data from the 2013 to 2018 US National Health Interview Survey, this paper explores whether being an LGB racial minority or LGB immigrant results in cumulative earning disadvantages/advantages. This study finds that regardless of race or immigrant status, gay men's earnings did not statistically differ from white/US-born heterosexual men's earnings. For white and US-born women, their earnings followed the same pattern, with lesbians earning the most, followed by heterosexual women, then bisexuals; however, for nonwhite women, bisexuals earned the most and lesbians earned the least. The results for immigrant sexual minorities were not statistically significant. These findings suggest that disadvantage/advantage is multilayered-sexual minorities who occupy multiple minority positions may experience different levels of disadvantage/advantage.

注意差距:美国非白人和移民少数群体的性取向工资差距》(Mind the Gap: Sexual Orientation Wage Gaps for Non-White and Immrant Minorities in the United States)。
越来越多的文献发现,性取向和性别会影响劳动力市场的结果,包括收入。这些文献普遍发现,同性恋和双性恋男性的收入低于异性恋男性。尽管女同性恋者是女性中收入最高的人群,但她们的收入低于异性恋男性,而双性恋女性的收入最低。对于女同性恋、男同性恋或双性恋(LGB)个人与属于其他少数群体的交叉性劣势/优势的研究则少得多。本文利用 2013 年至 2018 年美国全国健康访谈调查的数据,探讨了作为少数种族的女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋或变性者或女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋或变性者移民是否会导致累积的收入劣势/不利因素。本研究发现,无论种族或移民身份如何,男同性恋者的收入与白人/美国出生的异性恋男性的收入在统计上并无差异。对于白人和在美国出生的女性来说,她们的收入遵循同样的模式,女同性恋者收入最高,其次是异性恋女性,然后是双性恋者;然而,对于非白人女性来说,双性恋者收入最高,女同性恋者收入最低。移民性少数群体的结果没有统计学意义。这些研究结果表明,劣势/优势是多层次的--占据多种少数群体地位的性少数群体可能经历不同程度的劣势/优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
164
期刊介绍: The Journal of Homosexuality is an internationally acclaimed, peer-reviewed publication devoted to publishing a wide variety of disciplinary and interdisciplinary scholarship to foster a thorough understanding of the complexities, nuances, and the multifaceted aspects of sexuality and gender. The chief aim of the journal is to publish thought-provoking scholarship by researchers, community activists, and scholars who employ a range of research methodologies and who offer a variety of perspectives to continue shaping knowledge production in the arenas of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender (LGBT) studies and queer studies. The Journal of Homosexuality is committed to offering substantive, accessible reading to researchers and general readers alike in the hope of: spurring additional research, offering ideas to integrate into educational programs at schools, colleges & universities, or community-based organizations, and manifesting activism against sexual and gender prejudice (e.g., homophobia, biphobia and transphobia), including the promotion of sexual and gender justice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信