Quantitative analysis of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and superb microvascular imaging for the evaluation of disease activity in inflammatory bowel disease.

Chi Zhang, Chunyao Zheng, Zhiqi Zhang, Xueliang Yan, Jianhua Xu, Changyan Gu, Fang Nie
{"title":"Quantitative analysis of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and superb microvascular imaging for the evaluation of disease activity in inflammatory bowel disease.","authors":"Chi Zhang, Chunyao Zheng, Zhiqi Zhang, Xueliang Yan, Jianhua Xu, Changyan Gu, Fang Nie","doi":"10.3233/CH-242114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the effectiveness of conventional US (ultrasound), SMI (superb microvascular imaging), and CEUS (contrast-enhanced ultrasound) features for the assessment of the activity of inflammatory bowel disease.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Conventional US, CEUS and SMI features of 76 patients were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were categorized into two groups: active group (n = 57) and inactive group (n = 19), with endoscopic results as reference standard. Results in the active group and inactive group were compared using an independent t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, chi-square test, and receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis. Cut-off values were determined using ROC analysis, and sensitivity and specificity were calculated. US quantitative and TIC-based quantitative parameters were analyzed, and each patient was scored based on the parameters that are statistically significant and immediately available in the clinic to evaluate the diagnostic ability of conventional US, SMI, and CEUS features for active IBD patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Qualitative parameters such as CEUS enhancement pattern I/II, LimbergIII/IV, and lost bowel stratification were reliable indicators of active patients. Quantitative parameters such as bowel thickness and VI of mSMI were reliable indicators of active patients. Patients scored based on these statistically significant parameters with a score ≥3, were highly suspected to be active patients. For TIC-based quantitative parameters, PE, WiAUC, WoAUC, WiWoAUC, WiR, WiPI, and WoR were statistically significant in the differentiation of active IBD from inactive IBD.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Conventional US, SMI, and CEUS features may help in the differentiation of active IBD from inactive IBD and have potential application value in the choice of treatment options.</p>","PeriodicalId":93943,"journal":{"name":"Clinical hemorheology and microcirculation","volume":" ","pages":"451-464"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical hemorheology and microcirculation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/CH-242114","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of conventional US (ultrasound), SMI (superb microvascular imaging), and CEUS (contrast-enhanced ultrasound) features for the assessment of the activity of inflammatory bowel disease.

Methods: Conventional US, CEUS and SMI features of 76 patients were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were categorized into two groups: active group (n = 57) and inactive group (n = 19), with endoscopic results as reference standard. Results in the active group and inactive group were compared using an independent t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, chi-square test, and receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis. Cut-off values were determined using ROC analysis, and sensitivity and specificity were calculated. US quantitative and TIC-based quantitative parameters were analyzed, and each patient was scored based on the parameters that are statistically significant and immediately available in the clinic to evaluate the diagnostic ability of conventional US, SMI, and CEUS features for active IBD patients.

Results: Qualitative parameters such as CEUS enhancement pattern I/II, LimbergIII/IV, and lost bowel stratification were reliable indicators of active patients. Quantitative parameters such as bowel thickness and VI of mSMI were reliable indicators of active patients. Patients scored based on these statistically significant parameters with a score ≥3, were highly suspected to be active patients. For TIC-based quantitative parameters, PE, WiAUC, WoAUC, WiWoAUC, WiR, WiPI, and WoR were statistically significant in the differentiation of active IBD from inactive IBD.

Conclusions: Conventional US, SMI, and CEUS features may help in the differentiation of active IBD from inactive IBD and have potential application value in the choice of treatment options.

用于评估炎症性肠病疾病活动性的对比增强超声波和超级微血管成像定量分析。
目的评估传统 US(超声波)、SMI(超微血管成像)和 CEUS(对比增强超声波)特征对评估炎症性肠病活动性的有效性:方法: 对 76 例患者的常规 US、CEUS 和 SMI 特征进行回顾性分析。将患者分为两组:活动组(57 人)和非活动组(19 人),以内窥镜检查结果为参考标准。采用独立 t 检验、曼-惠特尼 U 检验、卡方检验和接收器操作特征曲线(ROC)分析比较积极组和不积极组的结果。使用 ROC 分析确定临界值,并计算灵敏度和特异性。对 US 定量和基于 TIC 的定量参数进行分析,并根据具有统计学意义且在临床上可立即使用的参数对每位患者进行评分,以评估传统 US、SMI 和 CEUS 特征对活动性 IBD 患者的诊断能力:结果:CEUS 增强模式 I/II、LimbergIII/IV 和肠分层丢失等定性参数是活动期患者的可靠指标。肠道厚度和 mSMI VI 等定量参数是活动期患者的可靠指标。根据这些具有统计学意义的参数进行评分,得分≥3 分的患者被高度怀疑为活动期患者。在基于TIC的定量参数中,PE、WiAUC、WoAUC、WiWoAUC、WiR、WiPI和WoR在区分活动性IBD和非活动性IBD方面具有统计学意义:结论:常规 US、SMI 和 CEUS 特征有助于区分活动性 IBD 和非活动性 IBD,在选择治疗方案时具有潜在的应用价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信