Design and radiological confirmation of 3-column cortical bone trajectory in the lumbar spine.

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Journal of neurosurgery. Spine Pub Date : 2024-05-24 Print Date: 2024-08-01 DOI:10.3171/2024.2.SPINE231208
Jia-Qi Wang, Ren-Jie Zhang, Lu-Ping Zhou, Chong-Yu Jia, Bo Zhang, Rui Sheng, Shu Fang, Cai-Liang Shen
{"title":"Design and radiological confirmation of 3-column cortical bone trajectory in the lumbar spine.","authors":"Jia-Qi Wang, Ren-Jie Zhang, Lu-Ping Zhou, Chong-Yu Jia, Bo Zhang, Rui Sheng, Shu Fang, Cai-Liang Shen","doi":"10.3171/2024.2.SPINE231208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to design a novel lumbar cortical bone trajectory (CBT) penetrating the anterior, middle, and posterior vertebral area using imaging; measure the relevant parameters to find theoretical parameters and screw placement possibilities; and investigate the optimal implantation trajectory of the CBT in patients with osteoporosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three types of CBTs with appropriate lengths were selected to simulate screw placement using Mimics software. These CBTs were classified as the leading tip of the trajectory pointing to the posterior quarter area (original CBT [CBT-O]) and middle (novel CBT A [CBT-A]) and anterior quarter (novel CBT B [CBT-B]) of the superior endplate. The authors then measured the maximum screw diameter (MSD) and length (MSL), cephalad (CA) and lateral (LA) angles, and bone mineral density (Hounsfield unit [HU] values) of the planned novel 3-column CBT screw placements. The differences in the parameters of the novel CBTs, the percentages of successfully planned CBT screws, and the factors that influenced the successful planning of 3-column CBT screws were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three-column CBT screws were successfully designed in all segments of the lumbar spine. The success rate of the 3-column CBT planned screws was 72.25% (83.25% for CBT-A and 61.25% for CBT-B). From the CBT-O type, to the CBT-A type, to the CBT-B type, the LA, CA, and MSD of the novel CBT screws decreased with increasing trajectory length. The HU values of the three types of trajectories were all significantly higher than that of the traditional pedicle screw trajectory (p < 0.001). The main factor affecting successful planning of the 3-column CBT screw was pedicle width.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Moderating adjustment of the original screw parameters by reducing LAs and CAs to penetrate the anterior, middle, and posterior columns of the vertebral body using the 3-column CBT screw is feasible, especially in the lower lumbar spine.</p>","PeriodicalId":16562,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery. Spine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgery. Spine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.2.SPINE231208","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to design a novel lumbar cortical bone trajectory (CBT) penetrating the anterior, middle, and posterior vertebral area using imaging; measure the relevant parameters to find theoretical parameters and screw placement possibilities; and investigate the optimal implantation trajectory of the CBT in patients with osteoporosis.

Methods: Three types of CBTs with appropriate lengths were selected to simulate screw placement using Mimics software. These CBTs were classified as the leading tip of the trajectory pointing to the posterior quarter area (original CBT [CBT-O]) and middle (novel CBT A [CBT-A]) and anterior quarter (novel CBT B [CBT-B]) of the superior endplate. The authors then measured the maximum screw diameter (MSD) and length (MSL), cephalad (CA) and lateral (LA) angles, and bone mineral density (Hounsfield unit [HU] values) of the planned novel 3-column CBT screw placements. The differences in the parameters of the novel CBTs, the percentages of successfully planned CBT screws, and the factors that influenced the successful planning of 3-column CBT screws were analyzed.

Results: Three-column CBT screws were successfully designed in all segments of the lumbar spine. The success rate of the 3-column CBT planned screws was 72.25% (83.25% for CBT-A and 61.25% for CBT-B). From the CBT-O type, to the CBT-A type, to the CBT-B type, the LA, CA, and MSD of the novel CBT screws decreased with increasing trajectory length. The HU values of the three types of trajectories were all significantly higher than that of the traditional pedicle screw trajectory (p < 0.001). The main factor affecting successful planning of the 3-column CBT screw was pedicle width.

Conclusions: Moderating adjustment of the original screw parameters by reducing LAs and CAs to penetrate the anterior, middle, and posterior columns of the vertebral body using the 3-column CBT screw is feasible, especially in the lower lumbar spine.

腰椎三柱皮质骨轨迹的设计和放射学确认。
研究目的本研究旨在利用成像技术设计一种新型腰椎皮质骨轨迹(CBT),可穿透椎体前、中、后区;测量相关参数,以找到理论参数和螺钉置入的可能性;并研究骨质疏松症患者的 CBT 最佳植入轨迹:方法:选择三种长度合适的 CBT,使用 Mimics 软件模拟螺钉植入。这些 CBT 的轨迹前端分别指向上终板的后四分之一区域(原始 CBT [CBT-O])、中部(新型 CBT A [CBT-A])和前四分之一区域(新型 CBT B [CBT-B])。然后,作者测量了计划中的新型 3 柱 CBT 螺钉植入的最大螺钉直径 (MSD) 和长度 (MSL)、头侧 (CA) 角和外侧 (LA) 角以及骨矿密度(Hounsfield 单位 [HU] 值)。分析了新型 CBT 参数的差异、成功规划 CBT 螺钉的百分比以及影响成功规划三柱 CBT 螺钉的因素:结果:在腰椎的所有节段都成功设计了三柱 CBT 螺钉。三柱 CBT 螺钉设计的成功率为 72.25%(CBT-A 型为 83.25%,CBT-B 型为 61.25%)。从 CBT-O 型、CBT-A 型到 CBT-B 型,新型 CBT 螺钉的 LA、CA 和 MSD 随轨迹长度的增加而降低。三种轨迹的 HU 值均明显高于传统椎弓根螺钉轨迹(P < 0.001)。影响三柱CBT螺钉成功规划的主要因素是椎弓根宽度:结论:通过减少LA和CA以穿透椎体前、中、后柱的三柱CBT螺钉对原始螺钉参数进行适度调整是可行的,尤其是在下腰椎。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of neurosurgery. Spine
Journal of neurosurgery. Spine 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
10.70%
发文量
396
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Primarily publish original works in neurosurgery but also include studies in clinical neurophysiology, organic neurology, ophthalmology, radiology, pathology, and molecular biology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信