The effectiveness of combined extrahepatic bile duct resection in radically resected cases with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a SEER-based retrospective cohort study and an external validation.

IF 12.5 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Tian-Run Lv, Jun-Ke Wang, Fu-Yu Li, Hai-Jie Hu
{"title":"The effectiveness of combined extrahepatic bile duct resection in radically resected cases with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a SEER-based retrospective cohort study and an external validation.","authors":"Tian-Run Lv, Jun-Ke Wang, Fu-Yu Li, Hai-Jie Hu","doi":"10.1097/JS9.0000000000001661","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the effectiveness of the combined extrahepatic bile duct resection (EHBDR) in cases with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IHCC) in terms of clinicopathological features and long-term survival.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Radically resected cases with IHCC from 2000 to 2020 were identified from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Comparative analyses were performed between resected IHCC patients who received EHBDR and those without EHBDR. Moreover, an external validation was further performed based on a single-center cohort.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1521 radically resected cases with IHCC (EHBDR: 189) were identified from the SEER database. Comparable age, sex, race, marital status, liver cirrhosis, differentiation status, and adjuvant chemotherapy were acquired between the two groups. EHBDR was associated with a higher incidence of adequate lymphadenectomy ( P <0.001). The incidence of cases with T3-4 or N+ disease was significantly higher in EHBDR group ( P <0.001). Adjuvant radiotherapy was more frequently performed in cases with EHBDR ( P <0.001). EHBDR failed to bring any survival benefit and was associated with a worse prognosis even after matching. Similar findings have also been revealed in the external validation cohort ( n =522, EHBDR: 117). EHBDR was associated with more extended resections, more aggressive tumor biological features, and worse prognosis. In the matched validation cohort, EHBDR was still associated with a higher incidence of early recurrence.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>EHBDR was an indicator of the advanced stage and failed to bring any survival benefit. It is the tumor stage that really determines the prognosis. More in-depth analyses focusing on different situations of EHBDR with more detailed clinical data are required.</p>","PeriodicalId":14401,"journal":{"name":"International journal of surgery","volume":" ","pages":"5342-5354"},"PeriodicalIF":12.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11392128/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000001661","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of the combined extrahepatic bile duct resection (EHBDR) in cases with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IHCC) in terms of clinicopathological features and long-term survival.

Methods: Radically resected cases with IHCC from 2000 to 2020 were identified from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Comparative analyses were performed between resected IHCC patients who received EHBDR and those without EHBDR. Moreover, an external validation was further performed based on a single-center cohort.

Results: A total of 1521 radically resected cases with IHCC (EHBDR: 189) were identified from the SEER database. Comparable age, sex, race, marital status, liver cirrhosis, differentiation status, and adjuvant chemotherapy were acquired between the two groups. EHBDR was associated with a higher incidence of adequate lymphadenectomy ( P <0.001). The incidence of cases with T3-4 or N+ disease was significantly higher in EHBDR group ( P <0.001). Adjuvant radiotherapy was more frequently performed in cases with EHBDR ( P <0.001). EHBDR failed to bring any survival benefit and was associated with a worse prognosis even after matching. Similar findings have also been revealed in the external validation cohort ( n =522, EHBDR: 117). EHBDR was associated with more extended resections, more aggressive tumor biological features, and worse prognosis. In the matched validation cohort, EHBDR was still associated with a higher incidence of early recurrence.

Conclusion: EHBDR was an indicator of the advanced stage and failed to bring any survival benefit. It is the tumor stage that really determines the prognosis. More in-depth analyses focusing on different situations of EHBDR with more detailed clinical data are required.

肝内胆管癌根治性切除病例中联合肝外胆管切除术的有效性:基于 SEER 的回顾性队列研究和外部验证。
目的评估肝内胆管癌(IHCC)病例中联合肝外胆管切除术(EHBDR)在临床病理特征和长期生存率方面的有效性:方法:从监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库中筛选出 2000 年至 2020 年肝内胆管癌根治性切除病例。对接受 EHBDR 和未接受 EHBDR 的 IHCC 患者进行了比较分析。此外,还在单中心队列的基础上进一步进行了外部验证:结果:从 SEER 数据库中共发现 1521 例 IHCC 根治性切除病例(EHBDR:189 例)。两组患者的年龄、性别、种族、婚姻状况、肝硬化、分化状况和辅助化疗情况相当。EHBDR与较高的充分淋巴结切除率相关(结论:EHBDR是晚期肝癌的指标:EHBDR是肿瘤晚期的一个指标,但并不能给患者带来任何生存益处。真正决定预后的是肿瘤分期。需要针对不同情况的 EHBDR 进行更深入的分析,并提供更详细的临床数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
17.70
自引率
3.30%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Surgery (IJS) has a broad scope, encompassing all surgical specialties. Its primary objective is to facilitate the exchange of crucial ideas and lines of thought between and across these specialties.By doing so, the journal aims to counter the growing trend of increasing sub-specialization, which can result in "tunnel-vision" and the isolation of significant surgical advancements within specific specialties.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信