Machine learning-based response assessment in patients with rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: radiomics analysis for assessing tumor regression grade using T2-weighted magnetic resonance images.

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Yong Dae Lee, Hyug-Gi Kim, Miri Seo, Sung Kyoung Moon, Seong Jin Park, Myung-Won You
{"title":"Machine learning-based response assessment in patients with rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: radiomics analysis for assessing tumor regression grade using T2-weighted magnetic resonance images.","authors":"Yong Dae Lee, Hyug-Gi Kim, Miri Seo, Sung Kyoung Moon, Seong Jin Park, Myung-Won You","doi":"10.1007/s00384-024-04651-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to assess tumor regression grade (TRG) in patients with rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) through a machine learning-based radiomics analysis using baseline T2-weighted magnetic resonance (MR) images.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In total, 148 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer(T2-4 or N+) who underwent MR imaging at baseline and after chemoradiotherapy between January 2010 and May 2021 were included. A region of interest for each tumor mass was drawn by a radiologist on oblique axial T2-weighted images, and main features were selected using principal component analysis after dimension reduction among 116 radiomics and three clinical features. Among eight learning models that were used for prediction model development, the model showing best performance was selected. Treatment responses were classified as either good or poor based on the MR-assessed TRG (mrTRG) and pathologic TRG (pTRG). The model performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC) to classify the response group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Approximately 49% of the patients were in the good response (GR) group based on mrTRG (73/148) and 26.9% based on pTRG (28/104). The AUCs of clinical data, radiomics models, and combined radiomics with clinical data model for predicting mrTRG were 0.80 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.73, 0.87), 0.74 (95% CI 0.66, 0.81), and 0.75(95% CI 0.68, 0.82), and those for predicting pTRG was 0.62 (95% CI 0.52, 0.71), 0.74 (95% CI 0.65, 0.82), and 0.79 (95% CI 0.71, 0.87).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Radiomics combined with clinical data model using baseline T2-weighted MR images demonstrated feasible diagnostic performance in predicting both MR-assessed and pathologic treatment response in patients with rectal cancer after NCRT.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":"39 1","pages":"78"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11126485/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-024-04651-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to assess tumor regression grade (TRG) in patients with rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) through a machine learning-based radiomics analysis using baseline T2-weighted magnetic resonance (MR) images.

Materials and methods: In total, 148 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer(T2-4 or N+) who underwent MR imaging at baseline and after chemoradiotherapy between January 2010 and May 2021 were included. A region of interest for each tumor mass was drawn by a radiologist on oblique axial T2-weighted images, and main features were selected using principal component analysis after dimension reduction among 116 radiomics and three clinical features. Among eight learning models that were used for prediction model development, the model showing best performance was selected. Treatment responses were classified as either good or poor based on the MR-assessed TRG (mrTRG) and pathologic TRG (pTRG). The model performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC) to classify the response group.

Results: Approximately 49% of the patients were in the good response (GR) group based on mrTRG (73/148) and 26.9% based on pTRG (28/104). The AUCs of clinical data, radiomics models, and combined radiomics with clinical data model for predicting mrTRG were 0.80 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.73, 0.87), 0.74 (95% CI 0.66, 0.81), and 0.75(95% CI 0.68, 0.82), and those for predicting pTRG was 0.62 (95% CI 0.52, 0.71), 0.74 (95% CI 0.65, 0.82), and 0.79 (95% CI 0.71, 0.87).

Conclusion: Radiomics combined with clinical data model using baseline T2-weighted MR images demonstrated feasible diagnostic performance in predicting both MR-assessed and pathologic treatment response in patients with rectal cancer after NCRT.

Abstract Image

基于机器学习的新辅助放化疗后直肠癌患者反应评估:利用T2加权磁共振图像评估肿瘤回归等级的放射组学分析。
目的:本研究旨在利用基线T2加权磁共振(MR)图像,通过基于机器学习的放射组学分析,评估新辅助化放疗(NCRT)后直肠癌患者的肿瘤回归分级(TRG):共纳入了148例局部晚期直肠癌(T2-4或N+)患者,这些患者在2010年1月至2021年5月期间接受了基线和化疗放疗后的磁共振成像。由放射科医生在斜轴向T2加权图像上为每个肿瘤肿块绘制感兴趣区,并在116个放射组学特征和3个临床特征中采用主成分分析法进行降维后选出主要特征。在用于开发预测模型的八个学习模型中,选出了表现最佳的模型。根据 MR 评估的 TRG(mrTRG)和病理 TRG(pTRG)将治疗反应分为良好和不良。使用接收者操作曲线下面积(AUROC)评估模型性能,以划分反应组:根据 mrTRG(73/148)和 pTRG(28/104),分别约有 49% 和 26.9% 的患者属于良好反应(GR)组。临床数据、放射组学模型以及放射组学与临床数据联合模型预测 mrTRG 的 AUC 分别为 0.80(95% 置信区间 [CI] 0.73,0.87)、0.74(95% CI 0.66,0.81)和0.75(95% CI 0.68,0.82),预测pTRG的结果分别为0.62(95% CI 0.52,0.71)、0.74(95% CI 0.65,0.82)和0.79(95% CI 0.71,0.87):利用基线T2加权磁共振图像的放射组学与临床数据模型相结合,在预测NCRT后直肠癌患者的磁共振评估和病理治疗反应方面表现出了可行的诊断性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信