Epinephrine vs. phenylephrine infusion for prophylaxis against maternal hypotension after spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Journal of Anesthesia Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-25 DOI:10.1007/s00540-024-03344-2
Yasmin S Hassabelnaby, Ahmed M Hasanin, Mohamed Shamardal, Maha Mostafa, Rana M Zaki, Mona Elsherbiny, Sherin Refaat
{"title":"Epinephrine vs. phenylephrine infusion for prophylaxis against maternal hypotension after spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Yasmin S Hassabelnaby, Ahmed M Hasanin, Mohamed Shamardal, Maha Mostafa, Rana M Zaki, Mona Elsherbiny, Sherin Refaat","doi":"10.1007/s00540-024-03344-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The hemodynamic effects of relatively low-dose epinephrine and phenylephrine infusions during cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia were compared.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This randomized controlled trial included full-term pregnant women who underwent elective cesarean delivery. After spinal anesthesia, participants received either epinephrine (0.03 mcg/kg/min) or phenylephrine (0.4 mcg/kg/min) infusion that continued until 5 min after delivery. The primary outcome was a composite outcome of the occurrence of any of hypotension, hypertension, bradycardia, and/or tachycardia. Neonatal outcomes, including umbilical artery blood gas and Apgar scores, were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 98 patients in each group were analyzed, and the number of patients with the composite outcome was comparable between the epinephrine and phenylephrine groups (30/98 [31%] vs. 31/98 [32%], respectively; P = 0.877). However, the incidence of hypotension was likely lower in the epinephrine group than in the phenylephrine group (P = 0.066), and the number of hypotensive episodes per patient was lower in the epinephrine group than in the phenylephrine group. On the other hand, the incidence of tachycardia was higher in the epinephrine group than that in the phenylephrine group. The incidence of hypertension was comparable between the two groups and none of the participants developed bradycardia. Neonatal outcomes were comparable between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Epinephrine and phenylephrine infusion produced comparable maternal hemodynamics and neonatal outcomes. Epinephrine was associated with a higher incidence of maternal tachycardia and likely lower incidence of maternal hypotension than phenylephrine. IRB number: MD-245-2022.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>This study was registered on May 31, 2023 at clinicaltrials.gov registry, NCT05881915, URL: https://classic.</p><p><strong>Clinicaltrials: </strong>gov/ct2/show/NCT05881915term=NCT05881915&draw=2&rank=1.</p>","PeriodicalId":14997,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anesthesia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-024-03344-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The hemodynamic effects of relatively low-dose epinephrine and phenylephrine infusions during cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia were compared.

Methods: This randomized controlled trial included full-term pregnant women who underwent elective cesarean delivery. After spinal anesthesia, participants received either epinephrine (0.03 mcg/kg/min) or phenylephrine (0.4 mcg/kg/min) infusion that continued until 5 min after delivery. The primary outcome was a composite outcome of the occurrence of any of hypotension, hypertension, bradycardia, and/or tachycardia. Neonatal outcomes, including umbilical artery blood gas and Apgar scores, were assessed.

Results: In total, 98 patients in each group were analyzed, and the number of patients with the composite outcome was comparable between the epinephrine and phenylephrine groups (30/98 [31%] vs. 31/98 [32%], respectively; P = 0.877). However, the incidence of hypotension was likely lower in the epinephrine group than in the phenylephrine group (P = 0.066), and the number of hypotensive episodes per patient was lower in the epinephrine group than in the phenylephrine group. On the other hand, the incidence of tachycardia was higher in the epinephrine group than that in the phenylephrine group. The incidence of hypertension was comparable between the two groups and none of the participants developed bradycardia. Neonatal outcomes were comparable between the two groups.

Conclusions: Epinephrine and phenylephrine infusion produced comparable maternal hemodynamics and neonatal outcomes. Epinephrine was associated with a higher incidence of maternal tachycardia and likely lower incidence of maternal hypotension than phenylephrine. IRB number: MD-245-2022.

Clinical trial registration: This study was registered on May 31, 2023 at clinicaltrials.gov registry, NCT05881915, URL: https://classic.

Clinicaltrials: gov/ct2/show/NCT05881915term=NCT05881915&draw=2&rank=1.

Abstract Image

在剖宫产脊髓麻醉后输注肾上腺素和苯肾上腺素预防产妇低血压:随机对照试验。
背景:比较了脊髓麻醉下剖宫产过程中相对低剂量肾上腺素和苯肾上腺素的血液动力学效应:比较了脊髓麻醉下剖宫产时输注相对低剂量肾上腺素和苯肾上腺素对血液动力学的影响:这项随机对照试验的参与者包括接受择期剖宫产的足月孕妇。脊髓麻醉后,参与者接受肾上腺素(0.03 mcg/kg/min)或苯肾上腺素(0.4 mcg/kg/min)输注,输注持续到分娩后 5 分钟。主要结果是发生低血压、高血压、心动过缓和/或心动过速的综合结果。新生儿结局包括脐动脉血气和阿普加评分:肾上腺素组与苯肾上腺素组中出现综合结果的患者人数相当(分别为 30/98 [31%] vs. 31/98 [32%];P = 0.877)。不过,肾上腺素组的低血压发生率可能低于苯肾上腺素组(P = 0.066),肾上腺素组每位患者的低血压发作次数也低于苯肾上腺素组。另一方面,肾上腺素组心动过速的发生率高于苯肾上腺素组。两组的高血压发生率相当,没有一人出现心动过缓。两组的新生儿结局相当:结论:输注肾上腺素和苯肾上腺素对产妇血液动力学和新生儿预后的影响相当。与苯肾上腺素相比,肾上腺素导致产妇心动过速的发生率较高,而产妇低血压的发生率可能较低。IRB 编号:MD-245-2022.临床试验MD-245-2022.临床试验注册:本研究于2023年5月31日在clinicaltrials.gov注册中心注册,注册号为NCT05881915,网址为:https://classic.Clinicaltrials: gov/ct2/show/NCT05881915term=NCT05881915&draw=2&rank=1。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Anesthesia
Journal of Anesthesia 医学-麻醉学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
112
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Anesthesia is the official journal of the Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists. This journal publishes original articles, review articles, special articles, clinical reports, short communications, letters to the editor, and book and multimedia reviews. The editors welcome the submission of manuscripts devoted to anesthesia and related topics from any country of the world. Membership in the Society is not a prerequisite. The Journal of Anesthesia (JA) welcomes case reports that show unique cases in perioperative medicine, intensive care, emergency medicine, and pain management.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信