Rigorous Donor Selection for Fecal Microbiota Transplantation in Active Ulcerative Colitis: Key Lessons From a Randomized Controlled Trial Halted for Futility
Clara Caenepeel , Sara Deleu , Jorge Francisco Vazquez Castellanos , Kaline Arnauts , Sara Braekeleire , Kathleen Machiels , Filip Baert , Fazia Mana , Lieven Pouillon , Pieter Hindryckx , Triana Lobaton , Edouard Louis , Denis Franchimont , Bram Verstockt , Marc Ferrante , João Sabino , Sara Vieira-Silva , Gwen Falony , Jeroen Raes , Séverine Vermeire
{"title":"Rigorous Donor Selection for Fecal Microbiota Transplantation in Active Ulcerative Colitis: Key Lessons From a Randomized Controlled Trial Halted for Futility","authors":"Clara Caenepeel , Sara Deleu , Jorge Francisco Vazquez Castellanos , Kaline Arnauts , Sara Braekeleire , Kathleen Machiels , Filip Baert , Fazia Mana , Lieven Pouillon , Pieter Hindryckx , Triana Lobaton , Edouard Louis , Denis Franchimont , Bram Verstockt , Marc Ferrante , João Sabino , Sara Vieira-Silva , Gwen Falony , Jeroen Raes , Séverine Vermeire","doi":"10.1016/j.cgh.2024.05.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background & Aims</h3><div>Rigorous donor preselection on microbiota level, strict anaerobic processing, and repeated fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) administration were hypothesized to improve FMT induction of remission in ulcerative colitis (UC).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The RESTORE-UC trial was a multi-centric, double-blind, sham-controlled, randomized trial. Patients with moderate to severe UC (defined by total Mayo 4–10) were randomly allocated to receive 4 anaerobic-prepared allogenic or autologous donor FMTs. Allogenic donor material was selected after a rigorous screening based on microbial cell count, enterotype, and the abundance of specific genera. The primary endpoint was steroid-free clinical remission (total Mayo ≤2, no sub-score >1) at week 8. A pre-planned futility analysis was performed after 66% (n = 72) of intended inclusions (n = 108). Quantitative microbiome profiling (n = 44) was performed at weeks 0 and 8.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In total, 72 patients were included, of which 66 received at least 1 FMT (allogenic FMT, n = 30 and autologous FMT, n = 36). At week 8, respectively, 3 and 5 patients reached the primary endpoint of steroid-free clinical remission (<em>P</em> = .72), indicating no treatment difference of at least 5% in favor of allogenic FMT. Hence, the study was stopped due to futility. Microbiome analysis showed numerically more enterotype transitions upon allogenic FMT compared with autologous FMT, and more transitions were observed when patients were treated with a different enterotype than their own at baseline (<em>P</em> = .01). Primary response was associated with lower total Mayo scores, lower bacterial cell counts, and higher Bacteroides 2 prevalence at baseline.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The RESTORE-UC trial did not meet its primary endpoint of increased steroid-free clinical remission at week 8. Further research should additionally consider patient selection, sterilized sham-control, increased frequency, density, and viability of FMT prior to administration.</div><div><span><span>ClinicalTrials.gov</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>, Number: <span><span>NCT03110289</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10347,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology","volume":"23 4","pages":"Pages 621-631.e7"},"PeriodicalIF":11.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1542356524004920","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background & Aims
Rigorous donor preselection on microbiota level, strict anaerobic processing, and repeated fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) administration were hypothesized to improve FMT induction of remission in ulcerative colitis (UC).
Methods
The RESTORE-UC trial was a multi-centric, double-blind, sham-controlled, randomized trial. Patients with moderate to severe UC (defined by total Mayo 4–10) were randomly allocated to receive 4 anaerobic-prepared allogenic or autologous donor FMTs. Allogenic donor material was selected after a rigorous screening based on microbial cell count, enterotype, and the abundance of specific genera. The primary endpoint was steroid-free clinical remission (total Mayo ≤2, no sub-score >1) at week 8. A pre-planned futility analysis was performed after 66% (n = 72) of intended inclusions (n = 108). Quantitative microbiome profiling (n = 44) was performed at weeks 0 and 8.
Results
In total, 72 patients were included, of which 66 received at least 1 FMT (allogenic FMT, n = 30 and autologous FMT, n = 36). At week 8, respectively, 3 and 5 patients reached the primary endpoint of steroid-free clinical remission (P = .72), indicating no treatment difference of at least 5% in favor of allogenic FMT. Hence, the study was stopped due to futility. Microbiome analysis showed numerically more enterotype transitions upon allogenic FMT compared with autologous FMT, and more transitions were observed when patients were treated with a different enterotype than their own at baseline (P = .01). Primary response was associated with lower total Mayo scores, lower bacterial cell counts, and higher Bacteroides 2 prevalence at baseline.
Conclusion
The RESTORE-UC trial did not meet its primary endpoint of increased steroid-free clinical remission at week 8. Further research should additionally consider patient selection, sterilized sham-control, increased frequency, density, and viability of FMT prior to administration.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology (CGH) is dedicated to offering readers a comprehensive exploration of themes in clinical gastroenterology and hepatology. Encompassing diagnostic, endoscopic, interventional, and therapeutic advances, the journal covers areas such as cancer, inflammatory diseases, functional gastrointestinal disorders, nutrition, absorption, and secretion.
As a peer-reviewed publication, CGH features original articles and scholarly reviews, ensuring immediate relevance to the practice of gastroenterology and hepatology. Beyond peer-reviewed content, the journal includes invited key reviews and articles on endoscopy/practice-based technology, health-care policy, and practice management. Multimedia elements, including images, video abstracts, and podcasts, enhance the reader's experience. CGH remains actively engaged with its audience through updates and commentary shared via platforms such as Facebook and Twitter.