Pedicled omental flaps for complex wound reconstruction following surgery for primary spine tumors of the mobile spine and sacrum.

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Journal of neurosurgery. Spine Pub Date : 2024-05-24 Print Date: 2024-08-01 DOI:10.3171/2024.2.SPINE231134
Elie Massaad, Shalin S Patel, Margaret Sten, Jane Shim, Ali Kiapour, John T Mullen, Daniel G Tobert, Shannon MacDonald, Francis J Hornicek, John H Shin
{"title":"Pedicled omental flaps for complex wound reconstruction following surgery for primary spine tumors of the mobile spine and sacrum.","authors":"Elie Massaad, Shalin S Patel, Margaret Sten, Jane Shim, Ali Kiapour, John T Mullen, Daniel G Tobert, Shannon MacDonald, Francis J Hornicek, John H Shin","doi":"10.3171/2024.2.SPINE231134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Surgery for primary tumors of the mobile spine and sacrum often requires complex reconstruction techniques to cover soft-tissue defects and to treat wound and CSF-related complications. The anatomical, vascular, and immunoregulatory characteristics of the omentum make it an excellent local substrate for the management of radiation soft-tissue injury, infection, and extensive wound defects. This study describes the authors' experience in complex wound reconstruction using pedicled omental flaps to cover defects in surgery for mobile spine and sacral primary tumors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted on 34 patients who underwent pedicled omental flap reconstruction after en bloc resection of primary sacral and mobile spine tumors between 2010 and 2020. The study focused on assessing the indications for omental flap usage, including soft-tissue coverage, protection against postoperative radiation therapy, infection management, vascular supply for bone grafts, and dural defect and CSF leak repair. Patient demographic characteristics, tumor characteristics, surgical outcomes, and follow-up data were analyzed to determine the procedure's efficacy and complication rates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 2010 to 2020, 34 patients underwent pedicled omental flap reconstruction after en bloc resection of sacral (24 of 34 [71%]) and mobile spine (10 of 34 [29%]) primary tumors, mostly chordomas. The patient cohort included 21 men and 13 women with a median (range) age of 60 (32-89) years. The most common indication for omental flap was soft-tissue coverage (20 of 34 [59%]). Other indications included protecting abdominopelvic organs for postoperative radiation therapy (6 of 34 [18%]), treating infections (5 of 34 [15%]), providing vascular supply for free fibular bone graft (1 of 34 [3%]), and repairing large dural defects and CSF leak (2 of 34 [6%]). The median (range) follow-up was 24 (0-132) months, during which 71% (24 of 34) of patients did not require additional surgery for wound-related complications. At last follow-up, 59% (20 of 34) had stable disease and 32% (11 of 34) had recurrence, had progression of disease, or had been discharged to hospice after treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The pedicled omentum is an effective local tissue graft that can be used for complex wound reconstruction and management of high-risk closures in primary spine tumors. This technique may have a lower rate of complications than other approaches and may influence surgical planning and flap selection in challenging cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":16562,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery. Spine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgery. Spine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.2.SPINE231134","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Surgery for primary tumors of the mobile spine and sacrum often requires complex reconstruction techniques to cover soft-tissue defects and to treat wound and CSF-related complications. The anatomical, vascular, and immunoregulatory characteristics of the omentum make it an excellent local substrate for the management of radiation soft-tissue injury, infection, and extensive wound defects. This study describes the authors' experience in complex wound reconstruction using pedicled omental flaps to cover defects in surgery for mobile spine and sacral primary tumors.

Methods: A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted on 34 patients who underwent pedicled omental flap reconstruction after en bloc resection of primary sacral and mobile spine tumors between 2010 and 2020. The study focused on assessing the indications for omental flap usage, including soft-tissue coverage, protection against postoperative radiation therapy, infection management, vascular supply for bone grafts, and dural defect and CSF leak repair. Patient demographic characteristics, tumor characteristics, surgical outcomes, and follow-up data were analyzed to determine the procedure's efficacy and complication rates.

Results: From 2010 to 2020, 34 patients underwent pedicled omental flap reconstruction after en bloc resection of sacral (24 of 34 [71%]) and mobile spine (10 of 34 [29%]) primary tumors, mostly chordomas. The patient cohort included 21 men and 13 women with a median (range) age of 60 (32-89) years. The most common indication for omental flap was soft-tissue coverage (20 of 34 [59%]). Other indications included protecting abdominopelvic organs for postoperative radiation therapy (6 of 34 [18%]), treating infections (5 of 34 [15%]), providing vascular supply for free fibular bone graft (1 of 34 [3%]), and repairing large dural defects and CSF leak (2 of 34 [6%]). The median (range) follow-up was 24 (0-132) months, during which 71% (24 of 34) of patients did not require additional surgery for wound-related complications. At last follow-up, 59% (20 of 34) had stable disease and 32% (11 of 34) had recurrence, had progression of disease, or had been discharged to hospice after treatment.

Conclusions: The pedicled omentum is an effective local tissue graft that can be used for complex wound reconstruction and management of high-risk closures in primary spine tumors. This technique may have a lower rate of complications than other approaches and may influence surgical planning and flap selection in challenging cases.

用于移动脊柱和骶骨原发性脊柱肿瘤术后复杂伤口重建的带蒂网膜瓣。
目的:移动脊柱和骶骨原发性肿瘤的手术通常需要复杂的重建技术来覆盖软组织缺损并治疗伤口和 CSF 相关并发症。网膜的解剖、血管和免疫调节特性使其成为处理放射性软组织损伤、感染和大面积伤口缺损的绝佳局部基质。本研究介绍了作者在脊柱和骶骨移动性原发性肿瘤手术中使用带蒂网膜瓣覆盖缺损进行复杂伤口重建的经验:对 2010 年至 2020 年间骶骨和移动脊柱原发性肿瘤全切后接受带蒂网膜瓣重建术的 34 例患者进行了回顾性队列分析。研究重点评估了网膜瓣的使用适应症,包括软组织覆盖、术后放疗保护、感染管理、骨移植的血管供应、硬脑膜缺损和脑脊液漏修复。对患者的人口统计学特征、肿瘤特征、手术结果和随访数据进行了分析,以确定手术的疗效和并发症发生率:从2010年到2020年,34名患者在骶骨(34例中的24例[71%])和移动脊柱(34例中的10例[29%])原发肿瘤(大部分为脊索瘤)全切除术后接受了有蒂网膜瓣重建术。患者包括 21 名男性和 13 名女性,中位(范围)年龄为 60(32-89)岁。网膜瓣最常见的适应症是软组织覆盖(34例中有20例[59%])。其他适应症包括术后放疗时保护腹盆腔器官(34 例中有 6 例 [18%])、治疗感染(34 例中有 5 例 [15%])、为游离腓骨移植提供血管供应(34 例中有 1 例 [3%]),以及修复巨大硬膜缺损和 CSF 渗漏(34 例中有 2 例 [6%])。随访时间的中位数(范围)为 24(0-132)个月,在此期间,71% 的患者(34 例中的 24 例)无需因伤口相关并发症而进行额外手术。最后一次随访时,59%的患者(34 例中的 20 例)病情稳定,32%的患者(34 例中的 11 例)复发、病情恶化或治疗后出院接受临终关怀:梗阻网膜是一种有效的局部组织移植,可用于原发性脊柱肿瘤的复杂伤口重建和高风险闭合的处理。与其他方法相比,该技术的并发症发生率较低,可影响手术计划和高难度病例的皮瓣选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of neurosurgery. Spine
Journal of neurosurgery. Spine 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
10.70%
发文量
396
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Primarily publish original works in neurosurgery but also include studies in clinical neurophysiology, organic neurology, ophthalmology, radiology, pathology, and molecular biology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信