The Association between Physical Frailty and Cognitive Performance in Older Adults Aged 60 to 96 Years: Data from the "Good Aging in Skåne" (GÅS) Swedish Population Study.

IF 2.8 Q3 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Annals of Geriatric Medicine and Research Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-17 DOI:10.4235/agmr.24.0055
Katrina Lundberg, Sölve Elmståhl, Lena Sandin Wranker, Henrik Ekström
{"title":"The Association between Physical Frailty and Cognitive Performance in Older Adults Aged 60 to 96 Years: Data from the \"Good Aging in Skåne\" (GÅS) Swedish Population Study.","authors":"Katrina Lundberg, Sölve Elmståhl, Lena Sandin Wranker, Henrik Ekström","doi":"10.4235/agmr.24.0055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The association between physical frailty and performance in different cognitive domains in the absence of cognitive disorders is poorly understood. Hence, we aimed to explore the associations between frailty levels based on the Fried Physical Frailty Phenotype and performance of different cognitive domains. We also aimed to examine the associations between cognitive function and each criterion in the Fried Frailty Scale using the same cognitive domains in a non-dementia population aged 60-96 years.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study included 4,329 participants aged 60-96 years, drawn from the \"Good Aging in Skåne\" population study. Frailty indices included handgrip strength, physical endurance, body mass index (BMI), physical activity, and walking speed. Cognitive function was assessed across eight domains: episodic memory, processing speed, semantic memory, verbal fluency, working memory, attention, executive function, and visual perception. We constructed adjusted multiple linear regression models for each cognitive domain, with the frailty levels as the independent variable. Likewise, we constructed linear regression models with each cognitive domain as the dependent variable and frailty criteria as independent variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Physical frailty was associated with poor performance in episodic memory, processing speed, semantic memory, verbal fluency, working memory, attention, and executive functions (p&lt;0.001 for all associations). Weaker hand grip strength was independently associated with poorer performance in all cognitive domains (p &lt; 0.015).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Higher levels of frailty were associated with poorer performance in all cognitive domains except visual perception. Describing frailty by considering cognitive functioning may provide a better understanding of frailty.</p>","PeriodicalId":44729,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Geriatric Medicine and Research","volume":" ","pages":"330-341"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11467518/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Geriatric Medicine and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4235/agmr.24.0055","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The association between physical frailty and performance in different cognitive domains in the absence of cognitive disorders is poorly understood. Hence, we aimed to explore the associations between frailty levels based on the Fried Physical Frailty Phenotype and performance of different cognitive domains. We also aimed to examine the associations between cognitive function and each criterion in the Fried Frailty Scale using the same cognitive domains in a non-dementia population aged 60-96 years.

Methods: This cross-sectional study included 4,329 participants aged 60-96 years, drawn from the "Good Aging in Skåne" population study. Frailty indices included handgrip strength, physical endurance, body mass index (BMI), physical activity, and walking speed. Cognitive function was assessed across eight domains: episodic memory, processing speed, semantic memory, verbal fluency, working memory, attention, executive function, and visual perception. We constructed adjusted multiple linear regression models for each cognitive domain, with the frailty levels as the independent variable. Likewise, we constructed linear regression models with each cognitive domain as the dependent variable and frailty criteria as independent variables.

Results: Physical frailty was associated with poor performance in episodic memory, processing speed, semantic memory, verbal fluency, working memory, attention, and executive functions (p<0.001 for all associations). Weaker hand grip strength was independently associated with poorer performance in all cognitive domains (p < 0.015).

Conclusion: Higher levels of frailty were associated with poorer performance in all cognitive domains except visual perception. Describing frailty by considering cognitive functioning may provide a better understanding of frailty.

60-96 岁老年人身体虚弱与认知能力之间的关系。瑞典 "斯科纳良好老龄化"(GÅS)人口研究数据。
背景:在没有认知障碍的情况下,身体虚弱与不同认知领域的表现之间的关系尚不清楚。因此,我们旨在探讨基于弗里德体质虚弱表型的虚弱程度与不同认知领域表现之间的关联。此外,我们还希望在 60-96 岁的非痴呆人群中,使用相同的认知领域来研究认知功能与弗里德体弱量表中各项标准之间的关联:这项横断面研究包括 4,329 名 60-93 岁的参与者,他们来自 "斯科纳良好老龄化 "人口研究。虚弱指数包括手握力、身体耐力、体重指数(BMI)、体力活动和步行速度。认知功能的评估涉及八个领域:外显记忆、处理速度、语义记忆、语言流畅性、工作记忆、注意力、执行功能和视觉感知。我们以虚弱程度为自变量,为每个认知领域构建了调整后的多元线性回归模型。同样,我们以每个认知领域为因变量,以虚弱标准为自变量,建立了线性回归模型:结果:身体虚弱与外显记忆、处理速度、语义记忆、言语流畅性、工作记忆、注意力和执行功能表现不佳有关(所有关联的 p 均小于 0.001)。手部握力较弱与所有认知领域的较差表现均有独立关联(p < 0.001-0.015):结论:较高的虚弱程度与除视觉感知以外的所有认知领域的较差表现都有关联。通过考虑认知功能来描述虚弱程度可能会让人对虚弱有更好的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Geriatric Medicine and Research
Annals of Geriatric Medicine and Research GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
35
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信