Right ventrolateral and left dorsolateral 10 Hz transcranial magnetic stimulation as an add-on treatment for bipolar I and II depression: a double-blind, randomised, three-arm, sham-controlled study.

IF 3 4区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Tomáš Novák, Lenka Kostýlková, Martin Bareš, Veronika Renková, Martin Hejzlar, Jiří Renka, Silvie Baumann, Olga Laskov, Monika Klírová
{"title":"Right ventrolateral and left dorsolateral 10 Hz transcranial magnetic stimulation as an add-on treatment for bipolar I and II depression: a double-blind, randomised, three-arm, sham-controlled study.","authors":"Tomáš Novák, Lenka Kostýlková, Martin Bareš, Veronika Renková, Martin Hejzlar, Jiří Renka, Silvie Baumann, Olga Laskov, Monika Klírová","doi":"10.1080/15622975.2024.2357110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Despite the clinical importance of bipolar depression (BDE), effective treatment options are still limited. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has proven of moderate efficacy in major depression, but the evidence remains inconclusive for BDE.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 4-week, double-blind, randomised, parallel-group, sham-controlled study (trial ID ISRCTN77188420) explored the benefits of 10 Hz MRI-guided right ventrolateral (RVL) rTMS and left dorsolateral (LDL) rTMS as add-on treatments for BDE. Outcome measures included changes in the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score, self-assessment, response and remission rates, and side effects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty patients were randomly assigned to study groups, and forty-six completed the double-blind phase. The mean change from baseline to Week 4 in MADRS was greater in both active groups compared to the sham, yet differences did not achieve significance (RVL vs sham: -4.50, 95%CI -10.63 to 1.64, <i>p</i> = 0.3; LDL vs sham: -4.07, 95%CI -10.24 to 2.10, <i>p</i> = 0.4). None of the other outcome measures yielded significant results.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While not demonstrating the superiority of either 10 Hz rTMS over sham, with the limited sample size, we can not rule out a moderate yet clinically meaningful effect. Further well-powered studies are essential to elucidate the role of rTMS in managing BDE.</p>","PeriodicalId":49358,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Biological Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"304-316"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Biological Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15622975.2024.2357110","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Despite the clinical importance of bipolar depression (BDE), effective treatment options are still limited. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has proven of moderate efficacy in major depression, but the evidence remains inconclusive for BDE.

Methods: A 4-week, double-blind, randomised, parallel-group, sham-controlled study (trial ID ISRCTN77188420) explored the benefits of 10 Hz MRI-guided right ventrolateral (RVL) rTMS and left dorsolateral (LDL) rTMS as add-on treatments for BDE. Outcome measures included changes in the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score, self-assessment, response and remission rates, and side effects.

Results: Sixty patients were randomly assigned to study groups, and forty-six completed the double-blind phase. The mean change from baseline to Week 4 in MADRS was greater in both active groups compared to the sham, yet differences did not achieve significance (RVL vs sham: -4.50, 95%CI -10.63 to 1.64, p = 0.3; LDL vs sham: -4.07, 95%CI -10.24 to 2.10, p = 0.4). None of the other outcome measures yielded significant results.

Conclusions: While not demonstrating the superiority of either 10 Hz rTMS over sham, with the limited sample size, we can not rule out a moderate yet clinically meaningful effect. Further well-powered studies are essential to elucidate the role of rTMS in managing BDE.

右侧胸外侧和左侧背外侧 10 赫兹经颅磁刺激作为双相 I 型和 II 型抑郁症的附加治疗方法:一项双盲、随机、三臂、假对照研究。
目的:尽管双相抑郁症(BDE)具有重要的临床意义,但有效的治疗方案仍然有限。经颅磁刺激(rTMS)已被证明对重度抑郁症有一定疗效,但对双相抑郁症的疗效仍无定论:一项为期四周的双盲、随机、平行组、假对照研究(试验编号为 ISRCTN77188420)探讨了 10Hz MRI 引导下的右侧腹外侧(RVL)经频磁刺激和左侧背外侧(LDL)经频磁刺激作为 BDE 附加治疗的益处。结果测量包括蒙哥马利-阿斯伯格抑郁量表(MADRS)评分变化、自我评估、反应和缓解率以及副作用:60名患者被随机分配到研究组,其中46人完成了双盲阶段。从基线到第4周,两组患者的MADRS平均变化均大于假性组,但差异不显著(RVL vs 假性组:-4.50,95%CI -10.63 to 1.64,p = 0.3;LDL vs 假性组:-4.07,95%CI -10.24 to 2.10,p = 0.4)。其他结果均无显著性结果:虽然没有证明 10Hz 经颅磁刺激疗法优于假性疗法,但由于样本量有限,我们不能排除其具有适度但有临床意义的效果。要阐明经颅磁刺激在治疗 BDE 中的作用,进一步开展有充分依据的研究至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
3.20%
发文量
73
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The aim of The World Journal of Biological Psychiatry is to increase the worldwide communication of knowledge in clinical and basic research on biological psychiatry. Its target audience is thus clinical psychiatrists, educators, scientists and students interested in biological psychiatry. The composition of The World Journal of Biological Psychiatry , with its diverse categories that allow communication of a great variety of information, ensures that it is of interest to a wide range of readers. The World Journal of Biological Psychiatry is a major clinically oriented journal on biological psychiatry. The opportunity to educate (through critical review papers, treatment guidelines and consensus reports), publish original work and observations (original papers and brief reports) and to express personal opinions (Letters to the Editor) makes The World Journal of Biological Psychiatry an extremely important medium in the field of biological psychiatry all over the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信