Right ventrolateral and left dorsolateral 10 Hz transcranial magnetic stimulation as an add-on treatment for bipolar I and II depression: a double-blind, randomised, three-arm, sham-controlled study.
Tomáš Novák, Lenka Kostýlková, Martin Bareš, Veronika Renková, Martin Hejzlar, Jiří Renka, Silvie Baumann, Olga Laskov, Monika Klírová
{"title":"Right ventrolateral and left dorsolateral 10 Hz transcranial magnetic stimulation as an add-on treatment for bipolar I and II depression: a double-blind, randomised, three-arm, sham-controlled study.","authors":"Tomáš Novák, Lenka Kostýlková, Martin Bareš, Veronika Renková, Martin Hejzlar, Jiří Renka, Silvie Baumann, Olga Laskov, Monika Klírová","doi":"10.1080/15622975.2024.2357110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Despite the clinical importance of bipolar depression (BDE), effective treatment options are still limited. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has proven of moderate efficacy in major depression, but the evidence remains inconclusive for BDE.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 4-week, double-blind, randomised, parallel-group, sham-controlled study (trial ID ISRCTN77188420) explored the benefits of 10 Hz MRI-guided right ventrolateral (RVL) rTMS and left dorsolateral (LDL) rTMS as add-on treatments for BDE. Outcome measures included changes in the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score, self-assessment, response and remission rates, and side effects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty patients were randomly assigned to study groups, and forty-six completed the double-blind phase. The mean change from baseline to Week 4 in MADRS was greater in both active groups compared to the sham, yet differences did not achieve significance (RVL vs sham: -4.50, 95%CI -10.63 to 1.64, <i>p</i> = 0.3; LDL vs sham: -4.07, 95%CI -10.24 to 2.10, <i>p</i> = 0.4). None of the other outcome measures yielded significant results.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While not demonstrating the superiority of either 10 Hz rTMS over sham, with the limited sample size, we can not rule out a moderate yet clinically meaningful effect. Further well-powered studies are essential to elucidate the role of rTMS in managing BDE.</p>","PeriodicalId":49358,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Biological Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"304-316"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Biological Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15622975.2024.2357110","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: Despite the clinical importance of bipolar depression (BDE), effective treatment options are still limited. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has proven of moderate efficacy in major depression, but the evidence remains inconclusive for BDE.
Methods: A 4-week, double-blind, randomised, parallel-group, sham-controlled study (trial ID ISRCTN77188420) explored the benefits of 10 Hz MRI-guided right ventrolateral (RVL) rTMS and left dorsolateral (LDL) rTMS as add-on treatments for BDE. Outcome measures included changes in the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score, self-assessment, response and remission rates, and side effects.
Results: Sixty patients were randomly assigned to study groups, and forty-six completed the double-blind phase. The mean change from baseline to Week 4 in MADRS was greater in both active groups compared to the sham, yet differences did not achieve significance (RVL vs sham: -4.50, 95%CI -10.63 to 1.64, p = 0.3; LDL vs sham: -4.07, 95%CI -10.24 to 2.10, p = 0.4). None of the other outcome measures yielded significant results.
Conclusions: While not demonstrating the superiority of either 10 Hz rTMS over sham, with the limited sample size, we can not rule out a moderate yet clinically meaningful effect. Further well-powered studies are essential to elucidate the role of rTMS in managing BDE.
期刊介绍:
The aim of The World Journal of Biological Psychiatry is to increase the worldwide communication of knowledge in clinical and basic research on biological psychiatry. Its target audience is thus clinical psychiatrists, educators, scientists and students interested in biological psychiatry. The composition of The World Journal of Biological Psychiatry , with its diverse categories that allow communication of a great variety of information, ensures that it is of interest to a wide range of readers.
The World Journal of Biological Psychiatry is a major clinically oriented journal on biological psychiatry. The opportunity to educate (through critical review papers, treatment guidelines and consensus reports), publish original work and observations (original papers and brief reports) and to express personal opinions (Letters to the Editor) makes The World Journal of Biological Psychiatry an extremely important medium in the field of biological psychiatry all over the world.