Laavanya Lokeesan, Elizabeth Martin, Yvette D Miller
{"title":"Establishing Methods to Assess Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative Compliance Using the Global Standards and Women's Self-Reported Experiences.","authors":"Laavanya Lokeesan, Elizabeth Martin, Yvette D Miller","doi":"10.1177/08903344241252644","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The World Health Organization recommends assessing compliance with key clinical practices of the Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative (BFHI; Steps 3-9) using birthing women's self-reports. Globally, compliance is mainly assessed using health staff reports, and the use of women's self-reports in selected countries has deviated from the Global Standards for the BFHI. Therefore, we aimed to provide insight into the appropriate method of incorporating women's self-reports in assessing compliance with Steps 3-9 of the BFHI. We developed questions and coding algorithms for assessing compliance with Steps 3-9 based on Global Standards for BFHI compliance, and implemented them via a cross-sectional survey of 302 women who gave birth to a live baby in Sri Lankan hospitals. Compliance with specific practices within each of Steps 3-9 and overall compliance with each step were described as percentages. Compliance with specific practices and each BFHI Step ranged from 15.9%-100% and 7.0%-100%, respectively. Our findings particularly emphasize the potentially enhanced usefulness and robustness of assessing all specific practices within BFHI key clinical steps and not focusing only on one practice within a step, to derive more useful health service guidance globally for capturing BFHI compliance and its impact on breastfeeding outcomes. This method could be translated across multiple settings globally. It would enable more specific identification of care advancements required by health services to improve the effectiveness of breastfeeding support and address the prevailing undervaluing and under-use of women's experiential data to evaluate and guide health service improvement.</p>","PeriodicalId":15948,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Human Lactation","volume":" ","pages":"405-412"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11340230/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Human Lactation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08903344241252644","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The World Health Organization recommends assessing compliance with key clinical practices of the Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative (BFHI; Steps 3-9) using birthing women's self-reports. Globally, compliance is mainly assessed using health staff reports, and the use of women's self-reports in selected countries has deviated from the Global Standards for the BFHI. Therefore, we aimed to provide insight into the appropriate method of incorporating women's self-reports in assessing compliance with Steps 3-9 of the BFHI. We developed questions and coding algorithms for assessing compliance with Steps 3-9 based on Global Standards for BFHI compliance, and implemented them via a cross-sectional survey of 302 women who gave birth to a live baby in Sri Lankan hospitals. Compliance with specific practices within each of Steps 3-9 and overall compliance with each step were described as percentages. Compliance with specific practices and each BFHI Step ranged from 15.9%-100% and 7.0%-100%, respectively. Our findings particularly emphasize the potentially enhanced usefulness and robustness of assessing all specific practices within BFHI key clinical steps and not focusing only on one practice within a step, to derive more useful health service guidance globally for capturing BFHI compliance and its impact on breastfeeding outcomes. This method could be translated across multiple settings globally. It would enable more specific identification of care advancements required by health services to improve the effectiveness of breastfeeding support and address the prevailing undervaluing and under-use of women's experiential data to evaluate and guide health service improvement.
期刊介绍:
Committed to the promotion of diversity and equity in all our policies and practices, our aims are:
To provide our readers and the international communities of clinicians, educators and scholars working in the field of lactation with current and quality-based evidence, from a broad array of disciplines, including the medical sciences, basic sciences, social sciences and the humanities.
To provide student and novice researchers, as well as, researchers whose native language is not English, with expert editorial guidance while preparing their work for publication in JHL.
In each issue, the Journal of Human Lactation publishes original research, original theoretical and conceptual articles, discussions of policy and practice issues, and the following special features:
Advocacy: A column that discusses a ‘hot’ topic in lactation advocacy
About Research: A column focused on an in-depth discussion of a different research topic each issue
Lactation Newsmakers: An interview with a widely-recognized outstanding expert in the field from around the globe
Research Commentary: A brief discussion of the issues raised in a specific research article published in the current issue
Book review(s): Reviews written by content experts about relevant new publications
International News Briefs: From major international lactation organizations.