Investigating the Effects of Tube Current and Tube Voltage on Patient Dose in Computed Tomography Examinations with Principial Component Analysis and Cluster Analysis: Phantom Study.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Health physics Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-24 DOI:10.1097/HP.0000000000001830
Güneş Açıkgöz
{"title":"Investigating the Effects of Tube Current and Tube Voltage on Patient Dose in Computed Tomography Examinations with Principial Component Analysis and Cluster Analysis: Phantom Study.","authors":"Güneş Açıkgöz","doi":"10.1097/HP.0000000000001830","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of tube current and tube voltage choices on patient dose in adult and pediatric CT protocols by qualitative analysis using Principal Component Analysis (PCA), cluster analysis, and statistical analysis.Dose length product (DLP), Effective mAs (Eff. mAs), and volume-weighted CT dose index (CTDIvol) dose descriptors were obtained from 16 adult and pediatric head phantom CT examinations. Different tube voltage and tube current values were selected in both pediatric head and adult head CT imaging protocols, and PCA and cluster analysis were applied to the data obtained for qualitative analysis of the relationship between CTDIvol, Eff. mAs and Total DLP values. The two principial components (PC) with the highest values among those obtained as a result of the PCA method were used. PC1 was 70.97%, and PC2 was 28.03%. In the cluster analysis, it was observed that the values obtained from pediatric and adult phantom CT scans were classified into two different clusters. The correlation coefficient for adult patients was r = 0.998, and for pediatric patients, the correlation coefficient was r = 0.947. When the obtained clusters were examined, the degree of closeness or distance of the variables could be observed. In the study, as a result of the analysis of CTDIvol, Eff. mAs and Total DLP data based on manufacturer data at different kV and mA values with PCA and cluster analysis, it was shown that pediatric patients could be exposed to more radiation than the adult patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":12976,"journal":{"name":"Health physics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HP.0000000000001830","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of tube current and tube voltage choices on patient dose in adult and pediatric CT protocols by qualitative analysis using Principal Component Analysis (PCA), cluster analysis, and statistical analysis.Dose length product (DLP), Effective mAs (Eff. mAs), and volume-weighted CT dose index (CTDIvol) dose descriptors were obtained from 16 adult and pediatric head phantom CT examinations. Different tube voltage and tube current values were selected in both pediatric head and adult head CT imaging protocols, and PCA and cluster analysis were applied to the data obtained for qualitative analysis of the relationship between CTDIvol, Eff. mAs and Total DLP values. The two principial components (PC) with the highest values among those obtained as a result of the PCA method were used. PC1 was 70.97%, and PC2 was 28.03%. In the cluster analysis, it was observed that the values obtained from pediatric and adult phantom CT scans were classified into two different clusters. The correlation coefficient for adult patients was r = 0.998, and for pediatric patients, the correlation coefficient was r = 0.947. When the obtained clusters were examined, the degree of closeness or distance of the variables could be observed. In the study, as a result of the analysis of CTDIvol, Eff. mAs and Total DLP data based on manufacturer data at different kV and mA values with PCA and cluster analysis, it was shown that pediatric patients could be exposed to more radiation than the adult patients.

利用主成分分析和聚类分析研究计算机断层扫描检查中管电流和管电压对患者剂量的影响:模型研究。
从16个成人和儿童头部CT模型检查中获得了剂量长度积(DLP)、有效毫安数(Eff. mAs)和容积加权CT剂量指数(CTDIvol)剂量描述。在儿童头部和成人头部 CT 成像方案中选择了不同的管电压和管电流值,并对获得的数据进行了 PCA 和聚类分析,以定性分析 CTDIvol、Eff.mAs 和总 DLP 值之间的关系。在 PCA 方法得出的结果中,使用了值最高的两个主成分 (PC)。PC1 为 70.97%,PC2 为 28.03%。在聚类分析中观察到,从小儿和成人模型 CT 扫描中获得的数值被分为两个不同的聚类。成人患者的相关系数为 r = 0.998,儿科患者的相关系数为 r = 0.947。在对所得到的聚类进行检验时,可以观察到变量之间的亲疏程度。在这项研究中,根据制造商提供的不同 kV 和 mA 值的 CTDIvol、Eff.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health physics
Health physics 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
324
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Physics, first published in 1958, provides the latest research to a wide variety of radiation safety professionals including health physicists, nuclear chemists, medical physicists, and radiation safety officers with interests in nuclear and radiation science. The Journal allows professionals in these and other disciplines in science and engineering to stay on the cutting edge of scientific and technological advances in the field of radiation safety. The Journal publishes original papers, technical notes, articles on advances in practical applications, editorials, and correspondence. Journal articles report on the latest findings in theoretical, practical, and applied disciplines of epidemiology and radiation effects, radiation biology and radiation science, radiation ecology, and related fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信