Optimizing Surgical Outcomes and the Role of Preventive Surgery: A Scoping Review.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Ryan P Cauley, Benjamin Rahmani, Oluwaseun D Adebagbo, John Park, Shannon R Garvey, Amy Chen, Sasha Nickman, Micaela Tobin, Lauren Valentine, Allan A Weidman, Dhruv Singhal, Arriyan Dowlatshahi, Samuel J Lin, Bernard T Lee
{"title":"Optimizing Surgical Outcomes and the Role of Preventive Surgery: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Ryan P Cauley, Benjamin Rahmani, Oluwaseun D Adebagbo, John Park, Shannon R Garvey, Amy Chen, Sasha Nickman, Micaela Tobin, Lauren Valentine, Allan A Weidman, Dhruv Singhal, Arriyan Dowlatshahi, Samuel J Lin, Bernard T Lee","doi":"10.1055/a-2331-7885","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong> Plastic and reconstructive surgeons are often presented with reconstructive challenges as a sequela of complications in high-risk surgical patients, ranging from exposure of hardware, lymphedema, and chronic pain after amputation. These complications can result in significant morbidity, recovery time, resource utilization, and cost. Given the prevalence of surgical complications managed by plastic and reconstructive surgeons, developing novel preventative techniques to mitigate surgical risk is paramount.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> Herein, we aim to understand efforts supporting the nascent field of Preventive Surgery<i>,</i> including (1) enhanced risk stratification, (2) advancements in postoperative care. Through an emphasis on four surgical cohorts who may benefit from preventive surgery, two of which are at high risk of morbidity from wound-related complications (patients undergoing sternotomy and spine procedures) and two at high risk of other morbidities, including lymphedema and neuropathic pain, we aim to provide a comprehensive and improved understanding of preventive surgery. Additionally, the role of risk analysis for these procedures and the relationship between microsurgery and prophylaxis is emphasized.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> (1) medical optimization and prehabilitation, (2) surgical mitigation techniques.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> Reconstructive surgeons are ideally placed to lead efforts in the creation and validation of accurate risk assessment tools and to support algorithmic approaches to surgical risk mitigation. Through a paradigm shift, including universal promotion of the concept of \"Preventive Surgery,\" major improvements in surgical outcomes may be achieved.</p>","PeriodicalId":16949,"journal":{"name":"Journal of reconstructive microsurgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of reconstructive microsurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2331-7885","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background:  Plastic and reconstructive surgeons are often presented with reconstructive challenges as a sequela of complications in high-risk surgical patients, ranging from exposure of hardware, lymphedema, and chronic pain after amputation. These complications can result in significant morbidity, recovery time, resource utilization, and cost. Given the prevalence of surgical complications managed by plastic and reconstructive surgeons, developing novel preventative techniques to mitigate surgical risk is paramount.

Methods:  Herein, we aim to understand efforts supporting the nascent field of Preventive Surgery, including (1) enhanced risk stratification, (2) advancements in postoperative care. Through an emphasis on four surgical cohorts who may benefit from preventive surgery, two of which are at high risk of morbidity from wound-related complications (patients undergoing sternotomy and spine procedures) and two at high risk of other morbidities, including lymphedema and neuropathic pain, we aim to provide a comprehensive and improved understanding of preventive surgery. Additionally, the role of risk analysis for these procedures and the relationship between microsurgery and prophylaxis is emphasized.

Results:  (1) medical optimization and prehabilitation, (2) surgical mitigation techniques.

Conclusion:  Reconstructive surgeons are ideally placed to lead efforts in the creation and validation of accurate risk assessment tools and to support algorithmic approaches to surgical risk mitigation. Through a paradigm shift, including universal promotion of the concept of "Preventive Surgery," major improvements in surgical outcomes may be achieved.

优化手术效果和预防性手术的作用:范围界定综述。
导言:整形外科医生经常要面对高风险手术患者并发症带来的重建挑战,包括硬件外露、淋巴水肿和截肢后的慢性疼痛。这些并发症会导致严重的发病率、恢复时间、资源利用率和成本。鉴于整形外科医生管理的手术并发症的普遍性,开发新型预防技术以降低手术风险至关重要。方法:在此,我们旨在了解支持新生预防外科领域的努力,包括(1)加强风险分层,(2)医疗优化和预康复,(3)手术缓解技术,以及(4)术后护理的进步。我们将重点放在可能从预防性手术中获益的四个手术组群上,其中两个是伤口相关并发症的高发病风险组群(接受胸骨切开术和脊柱手术的患者),另外两个是其他疾病的高发病风险组群,包括淋巴水肿和神经病理性疼痛。此外,我们还强调了风险分析在这些手术中的作用以及显微外科与预防性手术之间的关系:整形外科医生在创建和验证准确的风险评估工具以及支持降低手术风险的算法方面处于理想的领导地位。通过范式转变,包括普遍推广 "预防性手术 "的概念,可以大大改善手术效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
28.60%
发文量
80
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery is a peer-reviewed, indexed journal that provides an international forum for the publication of articles focusing on reconstructive microsurgery and complex reconstructive surgery. The journal was originally established in 1984 for the microsurgical community to publish and share academic papers. The Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery provides the latest in original research spanning basic laboratory, translational, and clinical investigations. Review papers cover current topics in complex reconstruction and microsurgery. In addition, special sections discuss new technologies, innovations, materials, and significant problem cases. The journal welcomes controversial topics, editorial comments, book reviews, and letters to the Editor, in order to complete the balanced spectrum of information available in the Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery. All articles undergo stringent peer review by international experts in the specialty.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信