Factors predicting redislocation or suture break in eyes after scleral-fixated intraocular lens.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Juseok Lee, Junwon Lee, Christopher Seungkyu Lee, Min Kim, Suk Ho Byeon, Sung Soo Kim, Hyun Goo Kang
{"title":"Factors predicting redislocation or suture break in eyes after scleral-fixated intraocular lens.","authors":"Juseok Lee, Junwon Lee, Christopher Seungkyu Lee, Min Kim, Suk Ho Byeon, Sung Soo Kim, Hyun Goo Kang","doi":"10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001497","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate predictive factors for redislocation in patients with recurrent intraocular lens (IOL) dislocation after secondary scleral-fixated IOL (SF IOL) surgery.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>2 tertiary referral hospitals.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective case series.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients undergoing SF IOL surgery were grouped into redislocation and no-redislocation groups. Medical records of consecutive patients who underwent SF IOL surgery between June 2014 and December 2019 at 2 tertiary referral centers were reviewed. Data regarding patient demographics, treatment factors, anatomical and functional outcomes, and postoperative complications were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>237 eyes of 225 patients (169 [75.1%] men) were included. The redislocation group was more likely to have a younger mean age at the initial SF IOL surgery (redislocation vs no-redislocation, 55.4 vs 62.0 years, respectively; P = .008), have a prior history of a previous suture break (23 eyes, 52.3% vs 1 eye, 0.5%; P < .001), and have undergone the initial SF IOL surgery using <1 mm-sized side-port incisions (17 eyes, 38.6% vs 32 eyes, 16.5%; P = .002) than was the no-redislocation group. In addition, the redislocation group had a higher occurrence of complications ( P < .001). Multivariate regression revealed that younger age, left eye involvement, aphakic status before the surgery, unremarkable primary IOL dislocation cause, need for ocular hypertension treatment and glaucoma surgery, and no large incision during the initial surgery were significantly (all P < .05) associated with redislocation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Younger age, left eye involvement, postoperative complications such as ocular hypertension and glaucoma, and techniques without large incisions increase the risk of redislocation. Conversely, lower risk factors include unremarkable surgery causes and a history of aphakic conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":15214,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cataract and refractive surgery","volume":" ","pages":"1037-1044"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cataract and refractive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001497","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate predictive factors for redislocation in patients with recurrent intraocular lens (IOL) dislocation after secondary scleral-fixated IOL (SF IOL) surgery.

Setting: 2 tertiary referral hospitals.

Design: Retrospective case series.

Methods: Patients undergoing SF IOL surgery were grouped into redislocation and no-redislocation groups. Medical records of consecutive patients who underwent SF IOL surgery between June 2014 and December 2019 at 2 tertiary referral centers were reviewed. Data regarding patient demographics, treatment factors, anatomical and functional outcomes, and postoperative complications were recorded.

Results: 237 eyes of 225 patients (169 [75.1%] men) were included. The redislocation group was more likely to have a younger mean age at the initial SF IOL surgery (redislocation vs no-redislocation, 55.4 vs 62.0 years, respectively; P = .008), have a prior history of a previous suture break (23 eyes, 52.3% vs 1 eye, 0.5%; P < .001), and have undergone the initial SF IOL surgery using <1 mm-sized side-port incisions (17 eyes, 38.6% vs 32 eyes, 16.5%; P = .002) than was the no-redislocation group. In addition, the redislocation group had a higher occurrence of complications ( P < .001). Multivariate regression revealed that younger age, left eye involvement, aphakic status before the surgery, unremarkable primary IOL dislocation cause, need for ocular hypertension treatment and glaucoma surgery, and no large incision during the initial surgery were significantly (all P < .05) associated with redislocation.

Conclusions: Younger age, left eye involvement, postoperative complications such as ocular hypertension and glaucoma, and techniques without large incisions increase the risk of redislocation. Conversely, lower risk factors include unremarkable surgery causes and a history of aphakic conditions.

预测巩膜固定人工晶体术后眼球重新脱位或缝线断裂的因素。
目的:研究二次巩膜固定人工晶体(SFIOL)手术后复发性眼内晶体(IOL)脱位患者再次脱位的预测因素:两家三级转诊医院:设计:回顾性病例系列:将接受SFIOL手术的患者分为再脱位组和无再脱位组。回顾性分析2014年6月至2019年12月期间在两家三级转诊中心接受SFIOL手术的连续患者的病历。记录了有关患者人口统计学、治疗因素、解剖和功能结果以及术后并发症的数据:我们纳入了 225 名患者的 237 只眼睛(169 名男性,占 75.1%)。重新定位组患者初次接受 SFIOL 手术时的平均年龄更小(重新定位组与未重新定位组相比,分别为 55.4 岁与 62.0 岁;P=0.008),之前有过缝线断裂史(23 眼,52.3% 与 1 眼,0.5%;PConclusion):年龄较小、左眼受累、术后并发症(如眼压过高和青光眼)以及没有大切口的技术会增加再脱位的风险。相反,风险较低的因素包括手术原因不显著和无晶体眼病史。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
14.30%
发文量
259
审稿时长
8.5 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery (JCRS), a preeminent peer-reviewed monthly ophthalmology publication, is the official journal of the American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery (ASCRS) and the European Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgeons (ESCRS). JCRS publishes high quality articles on all aspects of anterior segment surgery. In addition to original clinical studies, the journal features a consultation section, practical techniques, important cases, and reviews as well as basic science articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信