Innovation and Restructuring of Laboratory and Clinical Simulation in Undergraduate Nursing Programs During the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Integrative Review

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Shehnaaz Mohamed , Tawny Lowe , Melody Blanco , Sumayya Ansar , Kim Leighton , Jessie Johnson
{"title":"Innovation and Restructuring of Laboratory and Clinical Simulation in Undergraduate Nursing Programs During the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Integrative Review","authors":"Shehnaaz Mohamed ,&nbsp;Tawny Lowe ,&nbsp;Melody Blanco ,&nbsp;Sumayya Ansar ,&nbsp;Kim Leighton ,&nbsp;Jessie Johnson","doi":"10.1016/j.ecns.2024.101549","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The COVID-19 pandemic forced nursing education institutions to abruptly shift away from traditional in-person learning and find alternative approaches to fulfill program requirements. This integrative review explores the various innovative and restructured simulation strategies used by undergraduate nursing programs for lab and clinical courses in response to the pandemic.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Whittemore and Knafl's (2005) five-step framework guided this review. A systematic search of six academic databases and quality appraisal using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool yielded 10 studies for the review.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Strategies identified primarily employed virtual simulation methods using avatars or real people. Additional approaches included flipcharts and simulation-based flipped classrooms. Key themes pertaining to language and culture, immersion, facilitation and skills emerged.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Virtual simulation was a valuable tool during the pandemic, though not without challenges. Future implications are discussed. This review highlights the need for standardized terminology and considerations for cultural diversity in simulation. Additionally, further research into the effectiveness of virtual simulation as a replacement for in-person nursing clinical and lab experiences is warranted.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48753,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Simulation in Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876139924000410/pdfft?md5=fc68a8c0adb3014372f628eb5dabec3b&pid=1-s2.0-S1876139924000410-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Simulation in Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876139924000410","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The COVID-19 pandemic forced nursing education institutions to abruptly shift away from traditional in-person learning and find alternative approaches to fulfill program requirements. This integrative review explores the various innovative and restructured simulation strategies used by undergraduate nursing programs for lab and clinical courses in response to the pandemic.

Methods

Whittemore and Knafl's (2005) five-step framework guided this review. A systematic search of six academic databases and quality appraisal using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool yielded 10 studies for the review.

Results

Strategies identified primarily employed virtual simulation methods using avatars or real people. Additional approaches included flipcharts and simulation-based flipped classrooms. Key themes pertaining to language and culture, immersion, facilitation and skills emerged.

Conclusion

Virtual simulation was a valuable tool during the pandemic, though not without challenges. Future implications are discussed. This review highlights the need for standardized terminology and considerations for cultural diversity in simulation. Additionally, further research into the effectiveness of virtual simulation as a replacement for in-person nursing clinical and lab experiences is warranted.

COVID-19 大流行期间护理本科课程中实验室和临床模拟的创新与重组:综合评论
背景COVID-19大流行迫使护理教育机构突然放弃传统的面对面学习,转而寻找其他方法来满足课程要求。本综合综述探讨了本科护理项目为应对大流行病而在实验和临床课程中使用的各种创新和重组模拟策略。方法Whittemore 和 Knafl(2005 年)的五步框架为本综述提供了指导。对六个学术数据库进行了系统检索,并使用混合方法评估工具进行了质量评估,最终得出了 10 项综述研究。其他方法包括挂图和基于模拟的翻转课堂。结论在大流行病期间,虚拟模拟是一种有价值的工具,尽管并非没有挑战。本文讨论了未来的影响。本综述强调了在模拟中使用标准化术语和考虑文化多样性的必要性。此外,还需要进一步研究虚拟仿真替代真人护理临床和实验室经验的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
15.40%
发文量
107
期刊介绍: Clinical Simulation in Nursing is an international, peer reviewed journal published online monthly. Clinical Simulation in Nursing is the official journal of the International Nursing Association for Clinical Simulation & Learning (INACSL) and reflects its mission to advance the science of healthcare simulation. We will review and accept articles from other health provider disciplines, if they are determined to be of interest to our readership. The journal accepts manuscripts meeting one or more of the following criteria: Research articles and literature reviews (e.g. systematic, scoping, umbrella, integrative, etc.) about simulation Innovative teaching/learning strategies using simulation Articles updating guidelines, regulations, and legislative policies that impact simulation Leadership for simulation Simulation operations Clinical and academic uses of simulation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信