Simple prediction tools for disease progression in unvaccinated patients with mild/moderate COVID-19 aged under 65 years: Simplified DOATS and DOAT scores

IF 2.4 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Yoko Shibata , Hiroyuki Minemura , Yasuhito Suzuki , Takefumi Nikaido , Yoshinori Tanino , Mami Rikimaru , Takaya Kawamata , Ryuichi Togawa , Yuki Sato , Junpei Saito , Kenya Kanazawa , Ken Iseki
{"title":"Simple prediction tools for disease progression in unvaccinated patients with mild/moderate COVID-19 aged under 65 years: Simplified DOATS and DOAT scores","authors":"Yoko Shibata ,&nbsp;Hiroyuki Minemura ,&nbsp;Yasuhito Suzuki ,&nbsp;Takefumi Nikaido ,&nbsp;Yoshinori Tanino ,&nbsp;Mami Rikimaru ,&nbsp;Takaya Kawamata ,&nbsp;Ryuichi Togawa ,&nbsp;Yuki Sato ,&nbsp;Junpei Saito ,&nbsp;Kenya Kanazawa ,&nbsp;Ken Iseki","doi":"10.1016/j.resinv.2024.05.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>DOATS score and DOAT score, COVID-19 progression prediction tools we have developed, utilize clinical information such as presence of diabetes/obesity (DO), age (A), body temperature (T), and oxygen saturation (S). They showed good predictive power, but their scoring calculation was slightly complex, leading us to develop simplified versions. This report discusses the ability of the simplified versions to assess deterioration risk in unvaccinated, mild/moderate COVID-19 patients aged &lt;65 years. Logistic regression analysis identified independent risk factors for deterioration, to which points were assigned in order to derive overall prediction scores. The simplified versions showed high discriminating power, with the areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve for DOATS and DOAT being 0.79 and 0.77, respectively, indicating their clinical utility. Although the original versions have a slightly higher predictive power, the new versions are easier to use in emergency situations; thus, importantly, selecting the appropriate version depends on the situation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":20934,"journal":{"name":"Respiratory investigation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiratory investigation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212534524000819","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

DOATS score and DOAT score, COVID-19 progression prediction tools we have developed, utilize clinical information such as presence of diabetes/obesity (DO), age (A), body temperature (T), and oxygen saturation (S). They showed good predictive power, but their scoring calculation was slightly complex, leading us to develop simplified versions. This report discusses the ability of the simplified versions to assess deterioration risk in unvaccinated, mild/moderate COVID-19 patients aged <65 years. Logistic regression analysis identified independent risk factors for deterioration, to which points were assigned in order to derive overall prediction scores. The simplified versions showed high discriminating power, with the areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve for DOATS and DOAT being 0.79 and 0.77, respectively, indicating their clinical utility. Although the original versions have a slightly higher predictive power, the new versions are easier to use in emergency situations; thus, importantly, selecting the appropriate version depends on the situation.

65 岁以下未接种疫苗的轻度/中度 COVID-19 患者疾病进展的简单预测工具:简化的 DOATS 和 DOAT 评分
DOATS 评分和 DOAT 评分是我们开发的 COVID-19 进展预测工具,利用了糖尿病/肥胖(DO)、年龄(A)、体温(T)和血氧饱和度(S)等临床信息。这些工具显示出良好的预测能力,但其评分计算略显复杂,因此我们开发了简化版本。本报告讨论了简化版本评估未接种疫苗、轻度/中度 COVID-19 患者病情恶化风险的能力。逻辑回归分析确定了导致病情恶化的独立风险因素,并为这些因素赋分,以得出总体预测分数。简化版本显示出很高的分辨能力,DOATS 和 DOAT 的接收器操作特征曲线下面积分别为 0.79 和 0.77,表明其临床实用性很强。虽然原始版本的预测能力略高,但新版本更易于在紧急情况下使用;因此,重要的是,选择合适的版本取决于具体情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Respiratory investigation
Respiratory investigation RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.50%
发文量
114
审稿时长
64 days
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信