Telephone follow-up based on artificial intelligence technology among hypertension patients: Reliability study

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Siyuan Wang BM, Yan Shi MPH, Mengyun Sui PhD, Jing Shen BM, Chen Chen BM, Lin Zhang BM, Xin Zhang MD, Dongsheng Ren MD, Yuheng Wang MPH, Qinping Yang MPH, Junling Gao PhD, Minna Cheng MPH
{"title":"Telephone follow-up based on artificial intelligence technology among hypertension patients: Reliability study","authors":"Siyuan Wang BM,&nbsp;Yan Shi MPH,&nbsp;Mengyun Sui PhD,&nbsp;Jing Shen BM,&nbsp;Chen Chen BM,&nbsp;Lin Zhang BM,&nbsp;Xin Zhang MD,&nbsp;Dongsheng Ren MD,&nbsp;Yuheng Wang MPH,&nbsp;Qinping Yang MPH,&nbsp;Junling Gao PhD,&nbsp;Minna Cheng MPH","doi":"10.1111/jch.14823","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Artificial intelligence (AI) telephone is reliable for the follow-up and management of hypertensives. It takes less time and is equivalent to manual follow-up to a high degree. We conducted a reliability study to evaluate the efficiency of AI telephone follow-up in the management of hypertension. During May 18 and June 30, 2020, 350 hypertensives managed by the Pengpu Community Health Service Center in Shanghai were recruited for follow-up, once by AI and once by a human. The second follow-up was conducted within 3–7 days (mean 5.5 days). The mean length time of two calls were compared by paired <i>t</i>-test, and Cohen's Kappa coefficient was used to evaluate the reliability of the results between the two follow-up visits. The mean length time of AI calls was shorter (4.15 min) than that of manual calls (5.24 min, <i>P </i>&lt; .001). The answers related to the symptoms showed moderate to substantial consistency (<i>κ</i>:.465–.624, <i>P </i>&lt; .001), and those related to the complications showed fair consistency (<i>κ</i>:.349, <i>P </i>&lt; .001). In terms of lifestyle, the answer related to smoking showed a very high consistency (<i>κ</i>:.915, <i>P </i>&lt; .001), while those addressing salt consumption, alcohol consumption, and exercise showed moderate to substantial consistency (<i>κ</i>:.402–.645, <i>P </i>&lt; .001). There was moderate consistency in regular usage of medication (<i>κ</i>:.484, <i>P </i>&lt; .001).</p>","PeriodicalId":50237,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Hypertension","volume":"26 6","pages":"656-664"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11180679/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Hypertension","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jch.14823","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) telephone is reliable for the follow-up and management of hypertensives. It takes less time and is equivalent to manual follow-up to a high degree. We conducted a reliability study to evaluate the efficiency of AI telephone follow-up in the management of hypertension. During May 18 and June 30, 2020, 350 hypertensives managed by the Pengpu Community Health Service Center in Shanghai were recruited for follow-up, once by AI and once by a human. The second follow-up was conducted within 3–7 days (mean 5.5 days). The mean length time of two calls were compared by paired t-test, and Cohen's Kappa coefficient was used to evaluate the reliability of the results between the two follow-up visits. The mean length time of AI calls was shorter (4.15 min) than that of manual calls (5.24 min, < .001). The answers related to the symptoms showed moderate to substantial consistency (κ:.465–.624, < .001), and those related to the complications showed fair consistency (κ:.349, < .001). In terms of lifestyle, the answer related to smoking showed a very high consistency (κ:.915, < .001), while those addressing salt consumption, alcohol consumption, and exercise showed moderate to substantial consistency (κ:.402–.645, < .001). There was moderate consistency in regular usage of medication (κ:.484, < .001).

Abstract Image

基于人工智能技术的高血压患者电话随访:可靠性研究
人工智能(AI)电话对于高血压患者的随访和管理是可靠的。它花费的时间更少,在很大程度上等同于人工随访。我们进行了一项可靠性研究,以评估人工智能电话随访在高血压管理中的效率。2020 年 5 月 18 日至 6 月 30 日期间,上海彭浦社区卫生服务中心招募了 350 名高血压患者进行随访,其中人工智能随访一次,人工随访一次。第二次随访在 3-7 天内进行(平均 5.5 天)。通过配对 t 检验比较两次通话的平均时长,并使用 Cohen's Kappa 系数评估两次随访结果的可靠性。人工智能通话的平均时长(4.15 分钟)比手动通话的平均时长(5.24 分钟,P<0.05)短。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Hypertension
Journal of Clinical Hypertension PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
7.10%
发文量
191
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Hypertension is a peer-reviewed, monthly publication that serves internists, cardiologists, nephrologists, endocrinologists, hypertension specialists, primary care practitioners, pharmacists and all professionals interested in hypertension by providing objective, up-to-date information and practical recommendations on the full range of clinical aspects of hypertension. Commentaries and columns by experts in the field provide further insights into our original research articles as well as on major articles published elsewhere. Major guidelines for the management of hypertension are also an important feature of the Journal. Through its partnership with the World Hypertension League, JCH will include a new focus on hypertension and public health, including major policy issues, that features research and reviews related to disease characteristics and management at the population level.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信