Exploring miR-21 as a key regulator in two distinct approaches of bone marrow stromal cells differentiation into Schwann-like cells.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
Synapse Pub Date : 2024-05-01 DOI:10.1002/syn.22293
Yu-Mei Liu, He-Ying Wang, Cai-Hong Wei, Jun-Ping Li, Ying Wang, Wen-Zhi Ma, Hua Jia
{"title":"Exploring miR-21 as a key regulator in two distinct approaches of bone marrow stromal cells differentiation into Schwann-like cells.","authors":"Yu-Mei Liu, He-Ying Wang, Cai-Hong Wei, Jun-Ping Li, Ying Wang, Wen-Zhi Ma, Hua Jia","doi":"10.1002/syn.22293","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The differentiation of bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs) into Schwann-like cells (SCLCs) has the potential to promote the structural and functional restoration of injured axons. However, the optimal induction protocol and its underlying mechanisms remain unclear. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of different induction protocols in promoting the differentiation of rat BMSCs into SCLCs and to explore their potential mechanisms. BMSCs were induced using two distinct methods: a composite factor induction approach (Protocol-1) and a conditioned culture medium induction approach (Protocol-2). The expression of Schwann cells (SCs) marker proteins and neurotrophic factors (NTFs) in the differentiated cells was assessed. Cell proliferation and apoptosis were also measured. During induction, changes in miR-21 and Sprouty RTK signaling antagonist 2 (SPRY2) mRNA were analyzed. Following the transfection of BMSCs with miR-21 agomir or miR-21 antagomir, induction was carried out using both protocols, and the expression of SPRY2, ERK1/2, and SCs marker proteins was examined. The results revealed that NTFs expression was higher in Protocol-1, whereas SCs marker proteins expression did not significantly differ between the two groups. Compared to Protocol-1, Protocol-2 exhibited enhanced cell proliferation and fewer apoptotic and necrotic cells. Both protocols showed a negative correlation between miR-21 and SPRY2 expression throughout the induction stages. After induction, the miR-21 agomir group exhibited reduced SPRY2 expression, increased ERK1/2 expression, and significantly elevated expression of SCs marker proteins. This study demonstrates that Protocol-1 yields higher NTFs expression, whereas Protocol-2 results in stronger SCLCs proliferation. Upregulating miR-21 suppresses SPRY2 expression, activates the ERK1/2 signaling pathway, and promotes BMSC differentiation into SCLCs.</p>","PeriodicalId":22131,"journal":{"name":"Synapse","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Synapse","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/syn.22293","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The differentiation of bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs) into Schwann-like cells (SCLCs) has the potential to promote the structural and functional restoration of injured axons. However, the optimal induction protocol and its underlying mechanisms remain unclear. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of different induction protocols in promoting the differentiation of rat BMSCs into SCLCs and to explore their potential mechanisms. BMSCs were induced using two distinct methods: a composite factor induction approach (Protocol-1) and a conditioned culture medium induction approach (Protocol-2). The expression of Schwann cells (SCs) marker proteins and neurotrophic factors (NTFs) in the differentiated cells was assessed. Cell proliferation and apoptosis were also measured. During induction, changes in miR-21 and Sprouty RTK signaling antagonist 2 (SPRY2) mRNA were analyzed. Following the transfection of BMSCs with miR-21 agomir or miR-21 antagomir, induction was carried out using both protocols, and the expression of SPRY2, ERK1/2, and SCs marker proteins was examined. The results revealed that NTFs expression was higher in Protocol-1, whereas SCs marker proteins expression did not significantly differ between the two groups. Compared to Protocol-1, Protocol-2 exhibited enhanced cell proliferation and fewer apoptotic and necrotic cells. Both protocols showed a negative correlation between miR-21 and SPRY2 expression throughout the induction stages. After induction, the miR-21 agomir group exhibited reduced SPRY2 expression, increased ERK1/2 expression, and significantly elevated expression of SCs marker proteins. This study demonstrates that Protocol-1 yields higher NTFs expression, whereas Protocol-2 results in stronger SCLCs proliferation. Upregulating miR-21 suppresses SPRY2 expression, activates the ERK1/2 signaling pathway, and promotes BMSC differentiation into SCLCs.

探索 miR-21 作为骨髓基质细胞分化成施万样细胞的两种不同方法中的关键调节因子。
将骨髓基质细胞(BMSCs)分化成施万样细胞(SCLCs)有可能促进损伤轴突的结构和功能恢复。然而,最佳诱导方案及其内在机制仍不清楚。本研究旨在比较不同诱导方案在促进大鼠BMSCs分化为SCLCs方面的有效性,并探索其潜在机制。BMSCs 采用两种不同的方法进行诱导:复合因子诱导法(方案-1)和条件培养基诱导法(方案-2)。对分化细胞中许旺细胞(SCs)标记蛋白和神经营养因子(NTFs)的表达进行了评估。此外还测定了细胞增殖和凋亡。在诱导过程中,分析了 miR-21 和 Sprouty RTK 信号拮抗剂 2 (SPRY2) mRNA 的变化。用 miR-21 agomir 或 miR-21 antagomir 转染 BMSCs 后,使用两种方案进行诱导,并检测 SPRY2、ERK1/2 和 SCs 标记蛋白的表达。结果显示,"方案-1 "中 NTFs 的表达量更高,而 SCs 标记蛋白的表达量在两组之间没有显著差异。与方案-1相比,方案-2的细胞增殖增强,凋亡和坏死细胞减少。在整个诱导阶段,两种方案的 miR-21 和 SPRY2 表达均呈负相关。诱导后,miR-21 激动剂组的 SPRY2 表达减少,ERK1/2 表达增加,SCs 标记蛋白表达显著升高。这项研究表明,方案-1能产生更高的NTFs表达,而方案-2则会导致更强的SCLCs增殖。上调 miR-21 可抑制 SPRY2 的表达,激活 ERK1/2 信号通路,促进 BMSC 分化为 SCLCs。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Synapse
Synapse 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: SYNAPSE publishes articles concerned with all aspects of synaptic structure and function. This includes neurotransmitters, neuropeptides, neuromodulators, receptors, gap junctions, metabolism, plasticity, circuitry, mathematical modeling, ion channels, patch recording, single unit recording, development, behavior, pathology, toxicology, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信