Biomechanical comparison of bone staple fixation methods with suture material for median sternotomy closure using 3D-printed bone models.

IF 1.1 4区 农林科学 Q3 VETERINARY SCIENCES
New Zealand veterinary journal Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-22 DOI:10.1080/00480169.2024.2350432
Y G Park, J H Jo, J K Lee, J M Kim, S J Lee, H Y Kim
{"title":"Biomechanical comparison of bone staple fixation methods with suture material for median sternotomy closure using 3D-printed bone models.","authors":"Y G Park, J H Jo, J K Lee, J M Kim, S J Lee, H Y Kim","doi":"10.1080/00480169.2024.2350432","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To compare the biomechanical properties of three different sternal closure techniques in a 3D-printed bone model of a sternum from a 30-kg dog.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Median sternotomy was performed on a total of 90 three-dimensional (3D) copies of a polycarbonate (PC) model of a sternum, generated from the CT images of the sternum of a 30-kg German Shepherd dog. Three different methods were used to repair the sternotomies: polydioxanone suture (group PDS, n = 30), stainless steel bone staples (group SS, n = 30), and nitinol bone staples (group NS, n = 30). Each repair method was tested by applying tensile force in one of three ways (longitudinally, laterally, or torsionally) resulting in a sample size of n = 10 for each repair method-loading combination. In all experiments, the loads at 1-mm and 2-mm gap formation, failure, and the displacement at the failure point were measured.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In lateral distraction and longitudinal shear tests, NS and SS staple repairs required application of significantly greater force than PDS across all displacement criteria (1 and 2 mm). NS exhibited significantly greater failure load than PDS. In torsion tests, NS required significantly greater application of force compared to SS or PDS at all displacement criteria (1 and 2 mm) and exhibited a greater failure load than PDS. In terms of displacement at failure point, PDS suture showed more displacement than SS or NS across all experiments (laterally, longitudinally, torsionally).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this study, bone staples were mechanically superior to PDS suture in median sternotomy closure using 3D-printed bone model in terms of 1-mm, 2-mm displacement loads, and displacement at failure. NS had a higher failure load than PDS under lateral, longitudinal, and torsional distraction.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>These study results imply that bone staples can be considered as an alternative surgical method for median sternotomy closure in dogs.</p>","PeriodicalId":19322,"journal":{"name":"New Zealand veterinary journal","volume":" ","pages":"265-274"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Zealand veterinary journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00480169.2024.2350432","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To compare the biomechanical properties of three different sternal closure techniques in a 3D-printed bone model of a sternum from a 30-kg dog.

Methods: Median sternotomy was performed on a total of 90 three-dimensional (3D) copies of a polycarbonate (PC) model of a sternum, generated from the CT images of the sternum of a 30-kg German Shepherd dog. Three different methods were used to repair the sternotomies: polydioxanone suture (group PDS, n = 30), stainless steel bone staples (group SS, n = 30), and nitinol bone staples (group NS, n = 30). Each repair method was tested by applying tensile force in one of three ways (longitudinally, laterally, or torsionally) resulting in a sample size of n = 10 for each repair method-loading combination. In all experiments, the loads at 1-mm and 2-mm gap formation, failure, and the displacement at the failure point were measured.

Results: In lateral distraction and longitudinal shear tests, NS and SS staple repairs required application of significantly greater force than PDS across all displacement criteria (1 and 2 mm). NS exhibited significantly greater failure load than PDS. In torsion tests, NS required significantly greater application of force compared to SS or PDS at all displacement criteria (1 and 2 mm) and exhibited a greater failure load than PDS. In terms of displacement at failure point, PDS suture showed more displacement than SS or NS across all experiments (laterally, longitudinally, torsionally).

Conclusions: In this study, bone staples were mechanically superior to PDS suture in median sternotomy closure using 3D-printed bone model in terms of 1-mm, 2-mm displacement loads, and displacement at failure. NS had a higher failure load than PDS under lateral, longitudinal, and torsional distraction.

Clinical relevance: These study results imply that bone staples can be considered as an alternative surgical method for median sternotomy closure in dogs.

利用三维打印骨模型,比较骨钉固定法与缝合材料用于胸骨正中切口闭合的生物力学效果。
目的:比较三种不同胸骨闭合技术在30公斤重的狗胸骨三维打印骨模型中的生物力学特性:根据一只 30 千克重的德国牧羊犬的胸骨 CT 图像生成的聚碳酸酯(PC)胸骨模型,在总共 90 份三维(3D)副本上进行了胸骨正中切开术。胸骨切口采用了三种不同的修复方法:聚二氧丙酮缝合线(PDS 组,n = 30)、不锈钢骨钉(SS 组,n = 30)和镍钛诺骨钉(NS 组,n = 30)。每种修复方法都通过三种方式(纵向、横向或扭转)之一施加拉力进行测试,因此每种修复方法-加载组合的样本量为 n = 10。在所有实验中,都测量了 1 毫米和 2 毫米间隙形成时的载荷、破坏情况以及破坏点的位移:结果:在横向牵张和纵向剪切试验中,NS 和 SS 订书钉修复在所有位移标准(1 毫米和 2 毫米)下所需的力都明显大于 PDS。NS 的破坏载荷明显大于 PDS。在扭转测试中,与 SS 或 PDS 相比,NS 在所有位移标准(1 毫米和 2 毫米)下所需施加的力都要大得多,其失效载荷也比 PDS 大。就失效点的位移而言,在所有实验中(横向、纵向、扭转),PDS 缝线比 SS 或 NS 显示出更大的位移:结论:在这项研究中,使用三维打印骨模型进行胸骨正中切口缝合时,就1毫米、2毫米位移载荷和失效时位移而言,骨钉的机械性能优于PDS缝合线。在横向、纵向和扭转牵拉下,NS的失效载荷高于PDS:这些研究结果表明,骨钉可作为狗胸骨正中切口闭合的替代手术方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
New Zealand veterinary journal
New Zealand veterinary journal 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: The New Zealand Veterinary Journal (NZVJ) is an international journal publishing high quality peer-reviewed articles covering all aspects of veterinary science, including clinical practice, animal welfare and animal health. The NZVJ publishes original research findings, clinical communications (including novel case reports and case series), rapid communications, correspondence and review articles, originating from New Zealand and internationally. Topics should be relevant to, but not limited to, New Zealand veterinary and animal science communities, and include the disciplines of infectious disease, medicine, surgery and the health, management and welfare of production and companion animals, horses and New Zealand wildlife. All submissions are expected to meet the highest ethical and welfare standards, as detailed in the Journal’s instructions for authors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信