Disease-modifying therapies in systemic lupus erythematosus for extrarenal manifestations.

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 RHEUMATOLOGY
Anca D Askanase, Richard A Furie, Maria Dall'Era, Andrew S Bomback, Andreas Schwarting, Ming-Hui Zhao, Ian N Bruce, Munther Khamashta, Bernie Rubin, Angela Carroll, Mark Daniels, Roger Abramino Levy, Ronald van Vollenhoven, Murray B Urowitz
{"title":"Disease-modifying therapies in systemic lupus erythematosus for extrarenal manifestations.","authors":"Anca D Askanase, Richard A Furie, Maria Dall'Era, Andrew S Bomback, Andreas Schwarting, Ming-Hui Zhao, Ian N Bruce, Munther Khamashta, Bernie Rubin, Angela Carroll, Mark Daniels, Roger Abramino Levy, Ronald van Vollenhoven, Murray B Urowitz","doi":"10.1136/lupus-2023-001124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Our 2022 published working definition of disease modification in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) was 'minimising disease activity with the fewest treatment-associated toxicities and slowing or preventing organ damage progression'. The objective of this review was to classify current SLE treatments according to the proposed non-renal disease modification criteria excluding toxicities. Based on a review of select clinical trial (n=32) and observational study (n=54) publications for 14 SLE medications across different therapeutic classes, and the authors' clinical experience, we evaluated disease modification potential as per the proposed framework at three time points. Specific criteria used to determine disease modification potential included a drug's capacity to reduce: (1) non-renal disease activity, (2) severe flares, (3) use of steroids/immunosuppressants and (4) organ damage accrual. Criteria 1-3 were assessed at 1 year and 2-5 years and, when positive, were considered evidence for disease modification potential; criterion 4 was used to confirm disease modification at >5 years. Each treatment received one of four mutually exclusive designations at each time point: (a) criterion met, (b) indications of criterion met despite insufficient evidence in the literature, (c) inconclusive and (d) no available supportive data. This review excludes an assessment of potential toxicities. Eight of the 14 SLE treatments met ≥1 disease modification criteria up to year 5. Hydroxychloroquine improved overall survival at >5 years, suggesting long-term disease modification, but no data on specific organ systems were reported. Belimumab was the only treatment to meet all criteria. Belimumab and hydroxychloroquine met disease modification definitions across three time points. Evidence for other SLE therapies was incomplete, particularly at >5 years. Future studies are warranted for other treatments to meet the disease modification criteria. We discuss challenges to classification and possible updates to our published criteria.</p>","PeriodicalId":18126,"journal":{"name":"Lupus Science & Medicine","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11116871/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lupus Science & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/lupus-2023-001124","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Our 2022 published working definition of disease modification in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) was 'minimising disease activity with the fewest treatment-associated toxicities and slowing or preventing organ damage progression'. The objective of this review was to classify current SLE treatments according to the proposed non-renal disease modification criteria excluding toxicities. Based on a review of select clinical trial (n=32) and observational study (n=54) publications for 14 SLE medications across different therapeutic classes, and the authors' clinical experience, we evaluated disease modification potential as per the proposed framework at three time points. Specific criteria used to determine disease modification potential included a drug's capacity to reduce: (1) non-renal disease activity, (2) severe flares, (3) use of steroids/immunosuppressants and (4) organ damage accrual. Criteria 1-3 were assessed at 1 year and 2-5 years and, when positive, were considered evidence for disease modification potential; criterion 4 was used to confirm disease modification at >5 years. Each treatment received one of four mutually exclusive designations at each time point: (a) criterion met, (b) indications of criterion met despite insufficient evidence in the literature, (c) inconclusive and (d) no available supportive data. This review excludes an assessment of potential toxicities. Eight of the 14 SLE treatments met ≥1 disease modification criteria up to year 5. Hydroxychloroquine improved overall survival at >5 years, suggesting long-term disease modification, but no data on specific organ systems were reported. Belimumab was the only treatment to meet all criteria. Belimumab and hydroxychloroquine met disease modification definitions across three time points. Evidence for other SLE therapies was incomplete, particularly at >5 years. Future studies are warranted for other treatments to meet the disease modification criteria. We discuss challenges to classification and possible updates to our published criteria.

针对肾外表现的系统性红斑狼疮疾病调整疗法。
我们在2022年公布的系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)疾病调整的工作定义是 "以最少的治疗相关毒性将疾病活动降至最低,并减缓或防止器官损伤的进展"。本综述的目的是根据提出的非肾脏疾病治疗标准(不包括毒性)对目前的系统性红斑狼疮治疗方法进行分类。根据对不同治疗类别的 14 种系统性红斑狼疮药物的精选临床试验(32 例)和观察性研究(54 例)文献的回顾,以及作者的临床经验,我们按照建议的框架在三个时间点对疾病改变的可能性进行了评估。确定疾病调节潜力的具体标准包括药物是否能够减少:(1) 非肾脏疾病活动;(2) 严重复发;(3) 类固醇/免疫抑制剂的使用;(4) 器官损伤的累积。标准1-3在1年和2-5年时进行评估,如果呈阳性,则被认为是疾病改变潜力的证据;标准4用于在>5年时确认疾病改变。每种治疗方法在每个时间点都有四种相互排斥的称谓:(a) 符合标准;(b) 尽管文献证据不足,但有迹象表明符合标准;(c) 尚无定论;(d) 无可用支持数据。本综述不包括对潜在毒性的评估。在14种系统性红斑狼疮治疗方法中,有8种在第5年时符合≥1项疾病改变标准。羟氯喹改善了患者5年以上的总生存率,这表明其对疾病有长期的改善作用,但未报告有关特定器官系统的数据。贝利木单抗是唯一符合所有标准的治疗方法。贝利木单抗和羟氯喹在三个时间点上都符合疾病改变的定义。其他系统性红斑狼疮疗法的证据并不完整,尤其是超过5年的证据。未来有必要对其他符合疾病改变标准的疗法进行研究。我们讨论了分类所面临的挑战,以及对已发布标准的可能更新。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Lupus Science & Medicine
Lupus Science & Medicine RHEUMATOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
88
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Lupus Science & Medicine is a global, peer reviewed, open access online journal that provides a central point for publication of basic, clinical, translational, and epidemiological studies of all aspects of lupus and related diseases. It is the first lupus-specific open access journal in the world and was developed in response to the need for a barrier-free forum for publication of groundbreaking studies in lupus. The journal publishes research on lupus from fields including, but not limited to: rheumatology, dermatology, nephrology, immunology, pediatrics, cardiology, hepatology, pulmonology, obstetrics and gynecology, and psychiatry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信