Indirect assessment of low-intensity shockwave therapy's energy density and pulse frequency for erectile dysfunction: a systematic review, bayesian network meta-analysis and meta-regression.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
David E Hinojosa-Gonzalez, Alejandro Talamas Mendoza, Mauricio Torres-Martinez, Karla Diaz-Garza, Beatriz S Hernandez, Monica Isabel Muñoz Hibert, Isabela Ramirez-Mulhern, Kimberly Lizet Morales Palomino, Roberto Gonzalez-Oyervides
{"title":"Indirect assessment of low-intensity shockwave therapy's energy density and pulse frequency for erectile dysfunction: a systematic review, bayesian network meta-analysis and meta-regression.","authors":"David E Hinojosa-Gonzalez, Alejandro Talamas Mendoza, Mauricio Torres-Martinez, Karla Diaz-Garza, Beatriz S Hernandez, Monica Isabel Muñoz Hibert, Isabela Ramirez-Mulhern, Kimberly Lizet Morales Palomino, Roberto Gonzalez-Oyervides","doi":"10.1038/s41443-024-00910-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Shockwaves are thought to activate regenerative and angiogenic pathways, providing a possible therapeutic benefit for patients with erectile dysfunction. This study aimed to analyze the effectiveness of low-intensity extracorporeal shockwave therapy energy density and pulse frequency. In May 2022, a systematic search of online databases was performed to identify randomized clinical trials related to low-intensity extracorporeal shockwave therapy in erectile dysfunction. Eligible articles compared low-intensity extracorporeal shockwave therapy to controls or sham procedures. A Bayesian framework with 200,000 Markov chains was performed. We included a total of 1272 patients from 18 studies. The energy flux density measured in joules included 0.09 mJ/mm<sup>2</sup> (mean difference 3.2 IIEF [95% CrI 2.8, 3.6]), 0.15 mJ/mm<sup>2</sup> (mean difference 4.9 IIEF [95% CrI 2.8, 7.2]) and 0.20 mJ/mm<sup>2</sup> (mean difference 1.2 IIEF [95% CrI 0.11, 2.3]). Of these, 0.15 mJ/mm<sup>2</sup> had the greatest ranking (SUCRA = 0.983) compared with placebo. When analyzed by pulse frequency, significant increases were found in 500 pulses/session (mean difference 2.5 IIEF [CrI 1.9, 3.2]), 1500 pulses/session (mean difference 4.6 IIEF [95% CrI 3.9, 5.4]) and > 3000 pulses/session (mean difference 3.1 IIEF [95% CrI 2.1, 4.2]). Of these, 1500 pulses/session had the highest SUCRA, at 0.996. Our network meta-analysis suggests that low-intensity extracorporeal shockwave therapy is an effective intervention for erectile dysfunction, as measured by increases in the IIEF-EF. Sessions featuring 1500 pulses and an energy flux density of 0.15 mJ/mm<sup>2</sup> appear to be the most effective.</p>","PeriodicalId":14068,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Impotence Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Impotence Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-024-00910-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Shockwaves are thought to activate regenerative and angiogenic pathways, providing a possible therapeutic benefit for patients with erectile dysfunction. This study aimed to analyze the effectiveness of low-intensity extracorporeal shockwave therapy energy density and pulse frequency. In May 2022, a systematic search of online databases was performed to identify randomized clinical trials related to low-intensity extracorporeal shockwave therapy in erectile dysfunction. Eligible articles compared low-intensity extracorporeal shockwave therapy to controls or sham procedures. A Bayesian framework with 200,000 Markov chains was performed. We included a total of 1272 patients from 18 studies. The energy flux density measured in joules included 0.09 mJ/mm2 (mean difference 3.2 IIEF [95% CrI 2.8, 3.6]), 0.15 mJ/mm2 (mean difference 4.9 IIEF [95% CrI 2.8, 7.2]) and 0.20 mJ/mm2 (mean difference 1.2 IIEF [95% CrI 0.11, 2.3]). Of these, 0.15 mJ/mm2 had the greatest ranking (SUCRA = 0.983) compared with placebo. When analyzed by pulse frequency, significant increases were found in 500 pulses/session (mean difference 2.5 IIEF [CrI 1.9, 3.2]), 1500 pulses/session (mean difference 4.6 IIEF [95% CrI 3.9, 5.4]) and > 3000 pulses/session (mean difference 3.1 IIEF [95% CrI 2.1, 4.2]). Of these, 1500 pulses/session had the highest SUCRA, at 0.996. Our network meta-analysis suggests that low-intensity extracorporeal shockwave therapy is an effective intervention for erectile dysfunction, as measured by increases in the IIEF-EF. Sessions featuring 1500 pulses and an energy flux density of 0.15 mJ/mm2 appear to be the most effective.

Abstract Image

间接评估低强度冲击波疗法治疗勃起功能障碍的能量密度和脉冲频率:系统综述、贝叶斯网络荟萃分析和荟萃回归。
冲击波被认为可以激活再生和血管生成途径,从而为勃起功能障碍患者提供可能的治疗效果。本研究旨在分析低强度体外冲击波疗法能量密度和脉冲频率的有效性。2022年5月,研究人员对在线数据库进行了系统检索,以确定与低强度体外冲击波疗法治疗勃起功能障碍相关的随机临床试验。符合条件的文章将低强度体外冲击波疗法与对照组或假手术进行了比较。我们采用贝叶斯框架,使用了 200,000 个马尔科夫链。我们共纳入了 18 项研究中的 1272 名患者。以焦耳为单位的能量通量密度包括0.09 mJ/mm2(平均差异为3.2 IIEF [95% CrI 2.8, 3.6])、0.15 mJ/mm2(平均差异为4.9 IIEF [95% CrI 2.8, 7.2])和0.20 mJ/mm2(平均差异为1.2 IIEF [95% CrI 0.11, 2.3])。其中,与安慰剂相比,0.15 mJ/mm2 的排名最高(SUCRA = 0.983)。按脉冲频率进行分析时发现,500 脉冲/次(平均差异为 2.5 IIEF [CrI 1.9,3.2])、1500 脉冲/次(平均差异为 4.6 IIEF [95% CrI 3.9,5.4])和大于 3000 脉冲/次(平均差异为 3.1 IIEF [95% CrI 2.1,4.2])的脉冲频率显著增加。其中,1500 脉冲/次的 SUCRA 最高,为 0.996。我们的网络荟萃分析表明,低强度体外冲击波疗法是治疗勃起功能障碍的有效干预措施,其衡量标准是 IIEF-EF 的增加。1500次脉冲和0.15 mJ/mm2能量通量密度的疗程似乎最为有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Impotence Research
International Journal of Impotence Research 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
19.20%
发文量
140
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Impotence Research: The Journal of Sexual Medicine addresses sexual medicine for both genders as an interdisciplinary field. This includes basic science researchers, urologists, endocrinologists, cardiologists, family practitioners, gynecologists, internists, neurologists, psychiatrists, psychologists, radiologists and other health care clinicians.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信