Molecular Subtypes of High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer across Racial Groups and Gene Expression Platforms.

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Natalie R Davidson, Mollie E Barnard, Ariel A Hippen, Amy Campbell, Courtney E Johnson, Gregory P Way, Brian K Dalley, Andrew Berchuck, Lucas A Salas, Lauren C Peres, Jeffrey R Marks, Joellen M Schildkraut, Casey S Greene, Jennifer A Doherty
{"title":"Molecular Subtypes of High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer across Racial Groups and Gene Expression Platforms.","authors":"Natalie R Davidson, Mollie E Barnard, Ariel A Hippen, Amy Campbell, Courtney E Johnson, Gregory P Way, Brian K Dalley, Andrew Berchuck, Lucas A Salas, Lauren C Peres, Jeffrey R Marks, Joellen M Schildkraut, Casey S Greene, Jennifer A Doherty","doi":"10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-0113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>High-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC) gene expression subtypes are associated with differential survival. We characterized HGSC gene expression in Black individuals and considered whether gene expression differences by self-identified race may contribute to poorer HGSC survival among Black versus White individuals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included newly generated RNA sequencing data from Black and White individuals and array-based genotyping data from four existing studies of White and Japanese individuals. We used K-means clustering, a method with no predefined number of clusters or dataset-specific features, to assign subtypes. Cluster- and dataset-specific gene expression patterns were summarized by moderated t-scores. We compared cluster-specific gene expression patterns across datasets by calculating the correlation between the summarized vectors of moderated t-scores. After mapping to The Cancer Genome Atlas-derived HGSC subtypes, we used Cox proportional hazards models to estimate subtype-specific survival by dataset.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Cluster-specific gene expression was similar across gene expression platforms and racial groups. Comparing the Black population with the White and Japanese populations, the immunoreactive subtype was more common (39% vs. 23%-28%) and the differentiated subtype was less common (7% vs. 22%-31%). Patterns of subtype-specific survival were similar between the Black and White populations with RNA sequencing data; compared with mesenchymal cases, the risk of death was similar for proliferative and differentiated cases and suggestively lower for immunoreactive cases [Black population HR = 0.79 (0.55, 1.13); White population HR = 0.86 (0.62, 1.19)].</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although the prevalence of HGSC subtypes varied by race, subtype-specific survival was similar.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>HGSC subtypes can be consistently assigned across platforms and self-identified racial groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":9458,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11294000/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-0113","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: High-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC) gene expression subtypes are associated with differential survival. We characterized HGSC gene expression in Black individuals and considered whether gene expression differences by self-identified race may contribute to poorer HGSC survival among Black versus White individuals.

Methods: We included newly generated RNA sequencing data from Black and White individuals and array-based genotyping data from four existing studies of White and Japanese individuals. We used K-means clustering, a method with no predefined number of clusters or dataset-specific features, to assign subtypes. Cluster- and dataset-specific gene expression patterns were summarized by moderated t-scores. We compared cluster-specific gene expression patterns across datasets by calculating the correlation between the summarized vectors of moderated t-scores. After mapping to The Cancer Genome Atlas-derived HGSC subtypes, we used Cox proportional hazards models to estimate subtype-specific survival by dataset.

Results: Cluster-specific gene expression was similar across gene expression platforms and racial groups. Comparing the Black population with the White and Japanese populations, the immunoreactive subtype was more common (39% vs. 23%-28%) and the differentiated subtype was less common (7% vs. 22%-31%). Patterns of subtype-specific survival were similar between the Black and White populations with RNA sequencing data; compared with mesenchymal cases, the risk of death was similar for proliferative and differentiated cases and suggestively lower for immunoreactive cases [Black population HR = 0.79 (0.55, 1.13); White population HR = 0.86 (0.62, 1.19)].

Conclusions: Although the prevalence of HGSC subtypes varied by race, subtype-specific survival was similar.

Impact: HGSC subtypes can be consistently assigned across platforms and self-identified racial groups.

跨种族群体和基因表达平台的高级别浆液性卵巢癌分子亚型。
背景:高级别浆液性癌(HGSC)基因表达亚型与不同的生存率有关。我们描述了黑人的 HGSC 基因表达,并考虑了自我认同种族的基因表达差异是否会导致黑人的 HGSC 存活率低于白人:我们纳入了新生成的黑人和白人的 RNA-Seq 数据,以及现有的四项白人和日本人研究中基于阵列的基因分型数据。我们使用 K-均值聚类(一种不预先设定聚类数目或数据集特定特征的方法)来划分亚型。聚类和数据集特异性基因表达模式通过调节的 t score 进行总结。我们通过计算经调节的 t 分数汇总向量之间的相关性,比较不同数据集的群集特异性基因表达模式。在映射到癌症基因组图谱(TCGA)得出的HGSC亚型后,我们使用Cox比例危险模型按数据集估算亚型特异性生存率:不同基因表达平台和不同种族群体的簇特异性基因表达相似。黑人与白人和日本人相比,免疫反应亚型更常见(39%对23%-28%),分化亚型较少见(7%对22%-31%)。有RNA-Seq数据的黑人和白人人群的亚型特异性生存模式相似;与间质型病例相比,增殖型和分化型病例的死亡风险相似,而免疫反应型病例的死亡风险明显较低(黑人人群HR=0.79 [0.55, 1.13],白人人群HR=0.86 [0.62, 1.19]):影响:HGSC亚型可在不同平台和自我认同的种族群体中一致分配。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
2.60%
发文量
538
审稿时长
1.6 months
期刊介绍: Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention publishes original peer-reviewed, population-based research on cancer etiology, prevention, surveillance, and survivorship. The following topics are of special interest: descriptive, analytical, and molecular epidemiology; biomarkers including assay development, validation, and application; chemoprevention and other types of prevention research in the context of descriptive and observational studies; the role of behavioral factors in cancer etiology and prevention; survivorship studies; risk factors; implementation science and cancer care delivery; and the science of cancer health disparities. Besides welcoming manuscripts that address individual subjects in any of the relevant disciplines, CEBP editors encourage the submission of manuscripts with a transdisciplinary approach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信