Impact of blood transfusion on mortality and rebleeding in gastrointestinal bleeding: an 8-year cohort from a tertiary care center.

IF 2.1 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Annals of Gastroenterology Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-04-10 DOI:10.20524/aog.2024.0877
Anthony Kerbage, Tarek Nammour, Hani Tamim, Maha Makki, Yasser H Shaib, Ala I Sharara, Fadi Mourad, Jana G Hashash, Lara El Jamal, Don C Rockey, Kassem Barada
{"title":"Impact of blood transfusion on mortality and rebleeding in gastrointestinal bleeding: an 8-year cohort from a tertiary care center.","authors":"Anthony Kerbage, Tarek Nammour, Hani Tamim, Maha Makki, Yasser H Shaib, Ala I Sharara, Fadi Mourad, Jana G Hashash, Lara El Jamal, Don C Rockey, Kassem Barada","doi":"10.20524/aog.2024.0877","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of blood transfusion (BT) on mortality and rebleeding in patients with gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) and whether BT at a threshold of ≤7 g/dL may improve these outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective study was conducted in patients admitted with GIB between 2013 and 2021. Antithrombotic (AT) use and clinical outcomes were compared between transfused and non-transfused patients, and between those transfused at a threshold of ≤7 vs. >7 g/dL. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify predictors of mortality and rebleeding.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 667 patients, including 383 transfused, were followed up for a median of 56 months. Predictors of end-of-follow-up mortality included: age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index, stigmata of recent hemorrhage (SRH), and being on anticoagulants only upon presentation (P=0.026). SRH was a predictor of end-of-follow-up rebleeding, while having been on only antiplatelet therapy (AP) upon presentation was protective (P<0.001). BT was not associated with mortality or rebleeding at 1 month or end of follow up. Among transfused patients, being discharged only on AP protected against mortality (P=0.044). BT at >7 g/dL did not affect the risk of short or long-term rebleeding or mortality compared to BT at ≤7 g/dL.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Short- and long-term mortality and rebleeding in GIB were not affected by BT, nor by a transfusion threshold of ≤7 vs. >7 g/dL, but were affected by the use of AT. Further studies that account for AT use are needed to determine the best transfusion strategy in GIB.</p>","PeriodicalId":7978,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Gastroenterology","volume":"37 3","pages":"303-312"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11107406/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20524/aog.2024.0877","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of blood transfusion (BT) on mortality and rebleeding in patients with gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) and whether BT at a threshold of ≤7 g/dL may improve these outcomes.

Methods: A prospective study was conducted in patients admitted with GIB between 2013 and 2021. Antithrombotic (AT) use and clinical outcomes were compared between transfused and non-transfused patients, and between those transfused at a threshold of ≤7 vs. >7 g/dL. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify predictors of mortality and rebleeding.

Results: A total of 667 patients, including 383 transfused, were followed up for a median of 56 months. Predictors of end-of-follow-up mortality included: age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index, stigmata of recent hemorrhage (SRH), and being on anticoagulants only upon presentation (P=0.026). SRH was a predictor of end-of-follow-up rebleeding, while having been on only antiplatelet therapy (AP) upon presentation was protective (P<0.001). BT was not associated with mortality or rebleeding at 1 month or end of follow up. Among transfused patients, being discharged only on AP protected against mortality (P=0.044). BT at >7 g/dL did not affect the risk of short or long-term rebleeding or mortality compared to BT at ≤7 g/dL.

Conclusions: Short- and long-term mortality and rebleeding in GIB were not affected by BT, nor by a transfusion threshold of ≤7 vs. >7 g/dL, but were affected by the use of AT. Further studies that account for AT use are needed to determine the best transfusion strategy in GIB.

输血对消化道出血患者死亡率和再出血的影响:一家三级医疗中心的 8 年队列研究。
研究背景本研究旨在探讨输血(BT)对消化道出血(GIB)患者死亡率和再出血的影响,以及≤7 g/dL的输血阈值是否能改善这些结果:方法:对2013年至2021年间入院的GIB患者进行了一项前瞻性研究。比较了输血与非输血患者之间,以及输血阈值≤7 g/dL 与 >7 g/dL 患者之间的抗血栓(AT)使用情况和临床结果。进行了多变量分析,以确定死亡率和再出血的预测因素:共有 667 名患者接受了中位 56 个月的随访,其中包括 383 名输血患者。随访结束时的死亡率预测因素包括:年龄调整后的夏尔森综合指数(Charlson Comorbidity Index)、近期出血迹象(SRH)以及就诊时仅服用抗凝药物(P=0.026)。SRH是随访末期再出血的预测因素,而发病时仅接受抗血小板治疗(AP)具有保护作用(与BT≤7 g/dL相比,P7 g/dL不会影响短期或长期再出血或死亡风险):GIB的短期和长期死亡率及再出血不会受到BT的影响,也不会受到输血阈值≤7 g/dL与>7 g/dL的影响,但会受到AT使用的影响。需要进一步研究AT的使用情况,以确定GIB的最佳输血策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Gastroenterology
Annals of Gastroenterology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信