Hybrid Interventions for Pulmonary Vein Stenosis: Leveraging Intraoperative Endovascular Adjuncts in Challenging Clinical Scenarios.

Alyssa B Kalustian, Paige E Brlecic, Srinath T Gowda, Gary E Stapleton, Asra Khan, Lindsay F Eilers, Ravi Birla, Michiaki Imamura, Athar M Qureshi, Christopher A Caldarone, Manish Bansal
{"title":"Hybrid Interventions for Pulmonary Vein Stenosis: Leveraging Intraoperative Endovascular Adjuncts in Challenging Clinical Scenarios.","authors":"Alyssa B Kalustian, Paige E Brlecic, Srinath T Gowda, Gary E Stapleton, Asra Khan, Lindsay F Eilers, Ravi Birla, Michiaki Imamura, Athar M Qureshi, Christopher A Caldarone, Manish Bansal","doi":"10.1177/21501351241247503","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Pediatric pulmonary vein stenosis (PVS) is often progressive and treatment-refractory, requiring multiple interventions. Hybrid pulmonary vein interventions (HPVIs), involving intraoperative balloon angioplasty or stent placement, leverage surgical access and customization to optimize patency while facilitating future transcatheter procedures. We review our experience with HPVI and explore potential applications of this collaborative approach. <b>Methods:</b> Retrospective chart review of all HPVI cases between 2009 to 2023. <b>Results:</b> Ten patients with primary (n = 5) or post-repair (n = 5) PVS underwent HPVI at median age of 12.7 months (range 6.6 months-9.5 years). Concurrent surgical PVS repair was performed in 7/10 cases. Hybrid pulmonary vein intervention was performed on 17 veins, 13 (76%) with prior surgical or transcatheter intervention(s). One patient underwent intraoperative balloon angioplasty of an existing stent. In total, 18 stents (9 bare metal [5-10 mm diameter], 9 drug eluting [3.5-5 mm diameter]) were placed in 16 veins. At first angiography (median 48 days [range 7 days-2.8 years] postoperatively), 8 of 16 (50%) HPVI-stented veins developed in-stent stenosis. Two patients died from progressive PVS early in the study, one prior to planned reintervention. Median time to first pulmonary vein reintervention was 86 days (10 days-2.8 years; 8/10 patients, 13/17 veins). At median survivor follow-up of 2.2 years (2.3 months-13.1 years), 1 of 11 surviving HPVI veins were completely occluded. <b>Conclusions:</b> Hybrid pulmonary vein intervention represents a viable adjunct to existing PVS therapies, with promising flexibility to address limitations of surgical and transcatheter modalities. Reintervention is anticipated, necessitating evaluation of long-term benefits and durability as utilization increases.</p>","PeriodicalId":94270,"journal":{"name":"World journal for pediatric & congenital heart surgery","volume":" ","pages":"703-713"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World journal for pediatric & congenital heart surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21501351241247503","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pediatric pulmonary vein stenosis (PVS) is often progressive and treatment-refractory, requiring multiple interventions. Hybrid pulmonary vein interventions (HPVIs), involving intraoperative balloon angioplasty or stent placement, leverage surgical access and customization to optimize patency while facilitating future transcatheter procedures. We review our experience with HPVI and explore potential applications of this collaborative approach. Methods: Retrospective chart review of all HPVI cases between 2009 to 2023. Results: Ten patients with primary (n = 5) or post-repair (n = 5) PVS underwent HPVI at median age of 12.7 months (range 6.6 months-9.5 years). Concurrent surgical PVS repair was performed in 7/10 cases. Hybrid pulmonary vein intervention was performed on 17 veins, 13 (76%) with prior surgical or transcatheter intervention(s). One patient underwent intraoperative balloon angioplasty of an existing stent. In total, 18 stents (9 bare metal [5-10 mm diameter], 9 drug eluting [3.5-5 mm diameter]) were placed in 16 veins. At first angiography (median 48 days [range 7 days-2.8 years] postoperatively), 8 of 16 (50%) HPVI-stented veins developed in-stent stenosis. Two patients died from progressive PVS early in the study, one prior to planned reintervention. Median time to first pulmonary vein reintervention was 86 days (10 days-2.8 years; 8/10 patients, 13/17 veins). At median survivor follow-up of 2.2 years (2.3 months-13.1 years), 1 of 11 surviving HPVI veins were completely occluded. Conclusions: Hybrid pulmonary vein intervention represents a viable adjunct to existing PVS therapies, with promising flexibility to address limitations of surgical and transcatheter modalities. Reintervention is anticipated, necessitating evaluation of long-term benefits and durability as utilization increases.

肺静脉狭窄的混合介入治疗:在极具挑战性的临床场景中利用术中血管内辅助手段。
背景:小儿肺静脉狭窄(PVS)通常是进展性和难治性的,需要多次干预。混合肺静脉介入术(HPVI)涉及术中球囊血管成形术或支架置入术,它利用手术入路和定制来优化通畅性,同时促进未来的经导管手术。我们回顾了 HPVI 的经验,并探讨了这种合作方法的潜在应用。方法:对 2009 年至 2023 年间所有 HPVI 病例进行回顾性病历审查。结果:10 名原发性(5 人)或修复后(5 人)PVS 患者接受了 HPVI,中位年龄为 12.7 个月(6.6 个月至 9.5 年)。7/10 例病例同时进行了 PVS 修复手术。对 17 条静脉进行了混合肺静脉介入治疗,其中 13 条(76%)曾接受过手术或经导管介入治疗。一名患者在术中接受了现有支架的球囊血管成形术。总共在 16 条静脉中植入了 18 个支架(9 个裸金属支架[直径 5-10 毫米],9 个药物洗脱支架[直径 3.5-5 毫米])。首次血管造影时(术后中位 48 天 [7 天-2.8 年]),16 个 HPVI 支架植入的静脉中有 8 个(50%)出现支架内狭窄。两名患者在研究早期死于进展性 PVS,其中一人在计划再次介入前死亡。首次肺静脉再介入的中位时间为 86 天(10 天-2.8 年;8/10 名患者,13/17 条静脉)。幸存者随访时间中位数为 2.2 年(2.3 个月-13.1 年),11 位存活的 HPVI 静脉中,有 1 位完全闭塞。结论混合肺静脉介入治疗是现有 PVS 治疗方法的一种可行的辅助手段,在解决手术和经导管模式的局限性方面具有很好的灵活性。随着使用率的增加,预计会出现再次干预,因此有必要对长期效益和耐用性进行评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信