Pilot implementation and evaluation of the Sit-Stand e-Guide: an e-training program on the use of sit-stand workstations.

IF 2 3区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL
Ergonomics Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-22 DOI:10.1080/00140139.2024.2354379
Haroun Zerguine, Venerina Johnston, Ana D Goode, Genevieve N Healy
{"title":"Pilot implementation and evaluation of the Sit-Stand <i>e</i>-Guide: an <i>e</i>-training program on the use of sit-stand workstations.","authors":"Haroun Zerguine, Venerina Johnston, Ana D Goode, Genevieve N Healy","doi":"10.1080/00140139.2024.2354379","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The 'Sit-Stand <i>e</i>-Guide' <i>e</i>-training program, designed to promote appropriate use of sit-stand workstations (SSWs), was evaluated for usability, acceptability and impact on various outcomes among SSW users. Participants from a large municipal organisation (25% male; mean age 45 [SD = 10.6] years) completed questionnaires pre-training (T0, <i>n</i> = 57), immediately post-training (T1, <i>n</i> = 50), and four weeks (T2, <i>n</i> = 46: primary endpoint) and twelve months later (T3, <i>n</i> = 30). High usability, acceptability and usefulness scores were reported at T1. Median [IQR] knowledge (4.4/5 [0.9]) and confidence (4.6/5 [1.0]) significantly increased at T1 compared to baseline (2.8 [1.2]; 3.3 [1.4]) and maintained at T2 and T3. At T2, mean [SD] sitting time (5.3 [1.2] h/workday) and low back discomfort (2.4 [2.3]) significantly decreased compared to baseline (6.1 [1.3] h; 3.4 [2.5] discomfort), SSW usage increased (1.4 [1.4]-2.8 [1.7] transitions), with no significant changes in work performance. Some behavioural changes were sustained at T3. The Sit-Stand <i>e</i>-Guide was acceptable and effective; evaluation across diverse workplaces and workers is now needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":50503,"journal":{"name":"Ergonomics","volume":" ","pages":"1845-1862"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ergonomics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2024.2354379","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The 'Sit-Stand e-Guide' e-training program, designed to promote appropriate use of sit-stand workstations (SSWs), was evaluated for usability, acceptability and impact on various outcomes among SSW users. Participants from a large municipal organisation (25% male; mean age 45 [SD = 10.6] years) completed questionnaires pre-training (T0, n = 57), immediately post-training (T1, n = 50), and four weeks (T2, n = 46: primary endpoint) and twelve months later (T3, n = 30). High usability, acceptability and usefulness scores were reported at T1. Median [IQR] knowledge (4.4/5 [0.9]) and confidence (4.6/5 [1.0]) significantly increased at T1 compared to baseline (2.8 [1.2]; 3.3 [1.4]) and maintained at T2 and T3. At T2, mean [SD] sitting time (5.3 [1.2] h/workday) and low back discomfort (2.4 [2.3]) significantly decreased compared to baseline (6.1 [1.3] h; 3.4 [2.5] discomfort), SSW usage increased (1.4 [1.4]-2.8 [1.7] transitions), with no significant changes in work performance. Some behavioural changes were sustained at T3. The Sit-Stand e-Guide was acceptable and effective; evaluation across diverse workplaces and workers is now needed.

坐立电子指南》的试点实施和评估:关于使用坐立工作站的电子培训计划。
坐立电子指南 "电子培训项目旨在促进坐立工作站(SSW)的合理使用,该项目对SSW用户的可用性、可接受性以及对各种结果的影响进行了评估。来自一家大型市政机构的参与者(25% 为男性;平均年龄 45 [SD = 10.6] 岁)分别在培训前(T0,n = 57)、培训后(T1,n = 50)、四周后(T2,n = 46:主要终点)和十二个月后(T3,n = 30)完成了问卷调查。据报告,T1 的可用性、可接受性和有用性得分都很高。与基线(2.8 [1.2];3.3 [1.4])相比,T1 的知识(4.4/5 [0.9])和信心(4.6/5 [1.0])中位数[IQR]显著增加,并在 T2 和 T3 保持不变。与基线(6.1 [1.3] 小时;3.4 [2.5] 不适)相比,T2 的平均[标码]坐姿时间(5.3 [1.2] 小时/工作日)和腰背不适感(2.4 [2.3])明显减少,额外工作使用率增加(1.4 [1.4]-2.8 [1.7] 次),工作表现没有明显变化。一些行为变化在 T3 阶段得以持续。坐立电子指南是可接受的、有效的;现在需要对不同的工作场所和工人进行评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ergonomics
Ergonomics 工程技术-工程:工业
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
147
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Ergonomics, also known as human factors, is the scientific discipline that seeks to understand and improve human interactions with products, equipment, environments and systems. Drawing upon human biology, psychology, engineering and design, Ergonomics aims to develop and apply knowledge and techniques to optimise system performance, whilst protecting the health, safety and well-being of individuals involved. The attention of ergonomics extends across work, leisure and other aspects of our daily lives. The journal Ergonomics is an international refereed publication, with a 60 year tradition of disseminating high quality research. Original submissions, both theoretical and applied, are invited from across the subject, including physical, cognitive, organisational and environmental ergonomics. Papers reporting the findings of research from cognate disciplines are also welcome, where these contribute to understanding equipment, tasks, jobs, systems and environments and the corresponding needs, abilities and limitations of people. All published research articles in this journal have undergone rigorous peer review, based on initial editor screening and anonymous refereeing by independent expert referees.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信