Metabolic equivalents intensity thresholds for physical activity classification in older adults.

IF 3.7 1区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Javier Leal-Martín, Miguel Muñoz-Muñoz, Miguel Sierra-Ramón, Mónica Cerezo-Arroyo, Paola Gómez-Redondo, Luis M Alegre, Ignacio Ara, Francisco José García-García, Asier Mañas
{"title":"Metabolic equivalents intensity thresholds for physical activity classification in older adults.","authors":"Javier Leal-Martín, Miguel Muñoz-Muñoz, Miguel Sierra-Ramón, Mónica Cerezo-Arroyo, Paola Gómez-Redondo, Luis M Alegre, Ignacio Ara, Francisco José García-García, Asier Mañas","doi":"10.1186/s11556-024-00348-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although the metabolic equivalents (METs) system is a common procedure to quantify the intensity of physical activity in older adults, it remains unclear whether the conventional METs intensity thresholds (CTs) used for this purpose are appropriate in this population. Therefore, this study aimed (i) to derive overall and fitness-specific METs intensity thresholds in older adults ≥ 60 years old (OATs) expressed both in standard METs (VO<sub>2</sub>/3.5 mL O<sub>2</sub>·kg<sup>-1</sup>·min<sup>-1</sup>) and older adults METs<sub>60+</sub> (VO<sub>2</sub>/2.7 mL O<sub>2</sub>·kg<sup>-1</sup>·min<sup>-1</sup>), and (ii) to compare them with the CTs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 93 subjects were assessed for cardiorespiratory fitness. Graded exercise test protocols using indirect calorimetry were performed to calculate individual VO<sub>2max</sub> and categorize subjects as \"very poor/fair\" or \"good/superior\" fitness. Overall and fitness-specific OATs expressed in standard METs (OATs<sub>standard</sub>) and METs<sub>60+</sub> (OATs<sub>60+</sub>) were derived based on the %VO<sub>2max</sub> and the ventilatory thresholds (VTs) physical intensity categories.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significantly higher VO<sub>2max</sub>, VO<sub>2</sub> at VT<sub>1</sub> and VO<sub>2</sub> at VT<sub>2</sub> (p < 0.001) were obtained in the \"good/superior\" subgroup compared to the \"very poor/fair\" fitness subgroup. Accordingly, OATs were approximately 69% higher in individuals with a \"good/superior\" fitness compared to those with a \"very poor/fair\" fitness. Furthermore, this study showed that OATs<sub>standard</sub> were approximately 21-24% lower than OATs<sub>60+</sub>, and 10-22% higher OATs were observed when following the VTs intensity categories (heavy-intensity physical activity [HPA] and severe-intensity physical activity [SPA]) compared to the %VO<sub>2max</sub> categories (moderate-intensity physical activity [MPA] and vigorous-intensity physical activity [VPA]). When compared with the CTs, similar or higher OATs<sub>standard</sub> and OATs<sub>60+</sub> for MPA, and HPA were obtained compared to the conventional MPA threshold (3.0 METs). Conversely, for VPA and SPA, lower, similar, or higher OATs were obtained depending on the METs derivation approach (OATs<sub>standard</sub> or OATs<sub>60+</sub>) or the intensity categories (VO<sub>2max</sub> or VTs), compared to the conventional VPA threshold (6.0 METs).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>None of the derived OATs were concurrently similar to the CTs, suggesting that fitness-specific METs intensity thresholds adapted to the METs derivation approach should be used in older adults.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>FenotipAGING (Non-health-care intervention study), PRO-Training (NCT05619250).</p>","PeriodicalId":50477,"journal":{"name":"European Review of Aging and Physical Activity","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11110193/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Review of Aging and Physical Activity","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s11556-024-00348-5","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Although the metabolic equivalents (METs) system is a common procedure to quantify the intensity of physical activity in older adults, it remains unclear whether the conventional METs intensity thresholds (CTs) used for this purpose are appropriate in this population. Therefore, this study aimed (i) to derive overall and fitness-specific METs intensity thresholds in older adults ≥ 60 years old (OATs) expressed both in standard METs (VO2/3.5 mL O2·kg-1·min-1) and older adults METs60+ (VO2/2.7 mL O2·kg-1·min-1), and (ii) to compare them with the CTs.

Methods: A total of 93 subjects were assessed for cardiorespiratory fitness. Graded exercise test protocols using indirect calorimetry were performed to calculate individual VO2max and categorize subjects as "very poor/fair" or "good/superior" fitness. Overall and fitness-specific OATs expressed in standard METs (OATsstandard) and METs60+ (OATs60+) were derived based on the %VO2max and the ventilatory thresholds (VTs) physical intensity categories.

Results: Significantly higher VO2max, VO2 at VT1 and VO2 at VT2 (p < 0.001) were obtained in the "good/superior" subgroup compared to the "very poor/fair" fitness subgroup. Accordingly, OATs were approximately 69% higher in individuals with a "good/superior" fitness compared to those with a "very poor/fair" fitness. Furthermore, this study showed that OATsstandard were approximately 21-24% lower than OATs60+, and 10-22% higher OATs were observed when following the VTs intensity categories (heavy-intensity physical activity [HPA] and severe-intensity physical activity [SPA]) compared to the %VO2max categories (moderate-intensity physical activity [MPA] and vigorous-intensity physical activity [VPA]). When compared with the CTs, similar or higher OATsstandard and OATs60+ for MPA, and HPA were obtained compared to the conventional MPA threshold (3.0 METs). Conversely, for VPA and SPA, lower, similar, or higher OATs were obtained depending on the METs derivation approach (OATsstandard or OATs60+) or the intensity categories (VO2max or VTs), compared to the conventional VPA threshold (6.0 METs).

Conclusions: None of the derived OATs were concurrently similar to the CTs, suggesting that fitness-specific METs intensity thresholds adapted to the METs derivation approach should be used in older adults.

Trial registration: FenotipAGING (Non-health-care intervention study), PRO-Training (NCT05619250).

老年人体力活动分类的代谢当量强度阈值。
背景:虽然代谢当量(METs)系统是量化老年人体育活动强度的常用方法,但用于此目的的传统 METs 强度阈值(CTs)是否适合这一人群仍不清楚。因此,本研究旨在(i)得出以标准 METs(VO2/3.5 mL O2-kg-1-min-1)和老年人 METs60+ (VO2/2.7 mL O2-kg-1-min-1)表示的≥60 岁老年人的总体 METs 强度阈值(OATs),以及(ii)将其与 CTs 进行比较:方法:共对 93 名受试者进行了心肺功能评估。方法:共对 93 名受试者进行了心肺功能评估,采用间接量热法进行了分级运动测试,以计算个人的最大氧饱和度,并将受试者分为 "极差/一般 "和 "良好/优越 "两类。根据 VO2max%和通气阈值(VTs)体能强度类别,得出了以标准 METs(OATsstandard)和 METs60+ (OATs60+)表示的总体 OATs 和特定体能 OATs:与 VO2max%类别(中等强度体力活动[MPA]和剧烈强度体力活动[VPA])相比,按照 VTs 强度类别(大强度体力活动[HPA]和剧烈强度体力活动[SPA])计算的 VO2max、VT1 时的 VO2 和 VT2 时的 VO2(p 标准)比 OATs60+ 低约 21-24%,OATs 则高 10-22%。与 CT 相比,MPA 和 HPA 的标准 OATs 和 OATs60+ 与常规 MPA 临界值(3.0 METs)相似或更高。相反,就 VPA 和 SPA 而言,与传统的 VPA 临界值(6.0 METs)相比,根据 METs 推导方法(OATsstandard 或 OATs60+)或强度类别(VO2max 或 VTs),获得的 OATs 更低、相似或更高:结论:得出的 OATs 均不与 CTs 相似,这表明老年人应使用根据 METs 派生方法调整的特定 METs 强度阈值:试验注册:FenotipAGING(非保健干预研究)、PRO-Training(NCT05619250)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
1.60%
发文量
29
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: European Review of Aging and Physical Activity (EURAPA) disseminates research on the biomedical and behavioural aspects of physical activity and aging. The main issues addressed by EURAPA are the impact of physical activity or exercise on cognitive, physical, and psycho-social functioning of older people, physical activity patterns in advanced age, and the relationship between physical activity and health.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信