Do They Know It's Christmash? Lexical Knowledge Directly Impacts Speech Perception

IF 2.3 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Sahil Luthra, Anne Marie Crinnion, David Saltzman, James S. Magnuson
{"title":"Do They Know It's Christmash? Lexical Knowledge Directly Impacts Speech Perception","authors":"Sahil Luthra,&nbsp;Anne Marie Crinnion,&nbsp;David Saltzman,&nbsp;James S. Magnuson","doi":"10.1111/cogs.13449","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We recently reported strong, replicable (i.e., replicated) evidence for <i>lexically mediated compensation for coarticulation</i> (LCfC; Luthra et al., 2021), whereby lexical knowledge influences a prelexical process. Critically, evidence for LCfC provides robust support for <i>interactive</i> models of cognition that include <i>top-down feedback</i> and is inconsistent with <i>autonomous</i> models that allow only feedforward processing. McQueen, Jesse, and Mitterer (2023) offer five counter-arguments against our interpretation; we respond to each of those arguments here and conclude that top-down feedback provides the most parsimonious explanation of extant data.</p>","PeriodicalId":48349,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Science","volume":"48 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Science","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cogs.13449","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We recently reported strong, replicable (i.e., replicated) evidence for lexically mediated compensation for coarticulation (LCfC; Luthra et al., 2021), whereby lexical knowledge influences a prelexical process. Critically, evidence for LCfC provides robust support for interactive models of cognition that include top-down feedback and is inconsistent with autonomous models that allow only feedforward processing. McQueen, Jesse, and Mitterer (2023) offer five counter-arguments against our interpretation; we respond to each of those arguments here and conclude that top-down feedback provides the most parsimonious explanation of extant data.

他们知道这是圣诞节吗?词汇知识直接影响语音感知
我们最近报告了词汇介导的共同发音补偿(LCfC;Luthra et al.至关重要的是,LCfC 的证据为包含自上而下反馈的互动认知模型提供了强有力的支持,而与只允许前馈处理的自主模型并不一致。麦奎恩、杰西和米特勒(2023)针对我们的解释提出了五个反驳论点;我们在此一一回应,并得出结论:自上而下的反馈为现有数据提供了最合理的解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cognitive Science
Cognitive Science PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
8.00%
发文量
139
期刊介绍: Cognitive Science publishes articles in all areas of cognitive science, covering such topics as knowledge representation, inference, memory processes, learning, problem solving, planning, perception, natural language understanding, connectionism, brain theory, motor control, intentional systems, and other areas of interdisciplinary concern. Highest priority is given to research reports that are specifically written for a multidisciplinary audience. The audience is primarily researchers in cognitive science and its associated fields, including anthropologists, education researchers, psychologists, philosophers, linguists, computer scientists, neuroscientists, and roboticists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信