Treatment outcomes of digital nasoalveolar moulding in infants with cleft lip and palate: A systematic review with meta-analysis.

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Prabhat Kumar Chaudhari, Abirami Rajasekaran, Partha Haldar, Edlira Zere, Kunaal Dhingra, Raj Kumar Manas, Xianrui Yang
{"title":"Treatment outcomes of digital nasoalveolar moulding in infants with cleft lip and palate: A systematic review with meta-analysis.","authors":"Prabhat Kumar Chaudhari, Abirami Rajasekaran, Partha Haldar, Edlira Zere, Kunaal Dhingra, Raj Kumar Manas, Xianrui Yang","doi":"10.1111/ocr.12809","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this systematic review was to compare the treatment outcomes of digital nasoalveolar moulding (dNAM) technique with conventional nasoalveolar moulding (cNAM) or non-presurgical intervention protocol in infants with unilateral (UCLP) or bilateral (BCLP) cleft lip and palate. A bibliometric search by MEDLINE (via Ovid), Embase, Cochrane Library, grey literature and manual method was conducted without language restriction until November 2023. Literature screening and data extraction were undertaken in Covidence. The risk of bias was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and RoB-2. Pooled effect sizes were determined through random-effects statistical model using R-Software, and the certainty of evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach. Among 775 retrieved articles, nine studies were included for qualitative synthesis (6-UCLP, 3-BCLP), with only three eligible UCLP studies for meta-analysis. In the UCLP group, very low certainty of evidence indicated no difference in alveolar cleft width (SMD, 0.13 mm; 95% CI, -0.31 to 0.57; I<sup>2</sup>, 0%), soft tissue (lip) cleft gap, nasal width, nasal height, and columellar deviation angle changes between dNAM and cNAM. In the BCLP group, qualitative synthesis suggested similar changes in alveolar, lip, and nasal dimensions with dNAM and cNAM. In both cleft groups (UCLP, BCLP), reduced alveolar cleft width was observed in the dNAM group compared to the non-presurgical intervention protocol, along with fewer clinical visits and reduced chairside time for dNAM compared to cNAM. It can be concluded that the treatment outcomes with dNAM were comparable to cNAM in reducing malformation severity and were advantageous in terms of chairside time and clinical visit frequency. However, the overall quality of evidence is very low and standardization is needed for the virtual workflow regarding the alveolar movements and growth factor algorithms. Registration: PROSPERO-database (CRD42020186452).</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ocr.12809","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this systematic review was to compare the treatment outcomes of digital nasoalveolar moulding (dNAM) technique with conventional nasoalveolar moulding (cNAM) or non-presurgical intervention protocol in infants with unilateral (UCLP) or bilateral (BCLP) cleft lip and palate. A bibliometric search by MEDLINE (via Ovid), Embase, Cochrane Library, grey literature and manual method was conducted without language restriction until November 2023. Literature screening and data extraction were undertaken in Covidence. The risk of bias was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and RoB-2. Pooled effect sizes were determined through random-effects statistical model using R-Software, and the certainty of evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach. Among 775 retrieved articles, nine studies were included for qualitative synthesis (6-UCLP, 3-BCLP), with only three eligible UCLP studies for meta-analysis. In the UCLP group, very low certainty of evidence indicated no difference in alveolar cleft width (SMD, 0.13 mm; 95% CI, -0.31 to 0.57; I2, 0%), soft tissue (lip) cleft gap, nasal width, nasal height, and columellar deviation angle changes between dNAM and cNAM. In the BCLP group, qualitative synthesis suggested similar changes in alveolar, lip, and nasal dimensions with dNAM and cNAM. In both cleft groups (UCLP, BCLP), reduced alveolar cleft width was observed in the dNAM group compared to the non-presurgical intervention protocol, along with fewer clinical visits and reduced chairside time for dNAM compared to cNAM. It can be concluded that the treatment outcomes with dNAM were comparable to cNAM in reducing malformation severity and were advantageous in terms of chairside time and clinical visit frequency. However, the overall quality of evidence is very low and standardization is needed for the virtual workflow regarding the alveolar movements and growth factor algorithms. Registration: PROSPERO-database (CRD42020186452).

数字鼻齿槽成型术对唇腭裂婴儿的治疗效果:系统回顾与荟萃分析。
本系统性综述旨在比较数字鼻齿槽成型(dNAM)技术与传统鼻齿槽成型(cNAM)或非手术干预方案对单侧(UCLP)或双侧(BCLP)唇腭裂婴儿的治疗效果。在 2023 年 11 月之前,我们通过 MEDLINE(通过 Ovid)、Embase、Cochrane 图书馆、灰色文献和人工方法进行了文献计量学检索,没有语言限制。文献筛选和数据提取在 Covidence 中进行。采用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表和 RoB-2 评估偏倚风险。使用 R 软件通过随机效应统计模型确定汇总效应大小,并使用 GRADE 方法评估证据的确定性。在检索到的 775 篇文章中,有 9 项研究被纳入定性综合(6 项 UCLP,3 项 BCLP),只有 3 项符合条件的 UCLP 研究被纳入荟萃分析。在 UCLP 组中,极低的证据确定性表明 dNAM 和 cNAM 在齿槽裂宽度(SMD,0.13 毫米;95% CI,-0.31 至 0.57;I2,0%)、软组织(唇)裂间隙、鼻腔宽度、鼻腔高度和结肠偏角变化方面没有差异。在 BCLP 组中,定性综合结果表明 dNAM 和 cNAM 对牙槽骨、嘴唇和鼻腔尺寸的影响相似。在两个裂隙组(UCLP、BCLP)中,与非手术干预方案相比,dNAM 组的齿槽裂隙宽度减小,同时与 cNAM 相比,dNAM 的临床就诊次数减少,椅旁时间缩短。可以得出的结论是,在降低畸形严重程度方面,dNAM 的治疗效果与 cNAM 相当,而且在椅旁时间和临床就诊次数方面更具优势。然而,证据的总体质量很低,需要对有关牙槽移动和生长因子算法的虚拟工作流程进行标准化。注册:PROSPERO-database (CRD42020186452).
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信