Brain activity during reappraisal and associations with psychotherapy response in social anxiety and major depression: a randomized trial.

IF 5.9 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Cope Feurer, Jagan Jimmy, Melissa Uribe, Stewart A Shankman, Scott A Langenecker, Michelle G Craske, Olusola Ajilore, K Luan Phan, Heide Klumpp
{"title":"Brain activity during reappraisal and associations with psychotherapy response in social anxiety and major depression: a randomized trial.","authors":"Cope Feurer, Jagan Jimmy, Melissa Uribe, Stewart A Shankman, Scott A Langenecker, Michelle G Craske, Olusola Ajilore, K Luan Phan, Heide Klumpp","doi":"10.1017/S0033291724001120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is an effective treatment for patients with social anxiety disorder (SAD) or major depressive disorder (MDD), yet there is variability in clinical improvement. Though prior research suggests pre-treatment engagement of brain regions supporting cognitive reappraisal (e.g. dorsolateral prefrontal cortex [dlPFC]) foretells CBT response in SAD, it remains unknown if this extends to MDD or is specific to CBT. The current study examined associations between pre-treatment neural activity during reappraisal and clinical improvement in patients with SAD or MDD following a trial of CBT or supportive therapy (ST), a common-factors comparator arm.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were 75 treatment-seeking patients with SAD (<i>n</i> = 34) or MDD (<i>n</i> = 41) randomized to CBT (<i>n</i> = 40) or ST (<i>n</i> = 35). Before randomization, patients completed a cognitive reappraisal task during functional magnetic resonance imaging. Additionally, patients completed clinician-administered symptom measures and a self-report cognitive reappraisal measure before treatment and every 2 weeks throughout treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results indicated that pre-treatment neural activity during reappraisal differentially predicted CBT and ST response. Specifically, greater trajectories of symptom improvement throughout treatment were associated with less ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (vlPFC) activity for CBT patients, but more vlPFC activity for ST patients. Also, less baseline dlPFC activity corresponded with greater trajectories of self-reported reappraisal improvement, regardless of treatment arm.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>If replicated, findings suggest individual differences in brain response during reappraisal may be transdiagnostically associated with treatment-dependent improvement in symptom severity, but improvement in subjective reappraisal following psychotherapy, more broadly.</p>","PeriodicalId":20891,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291724001120","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is an effective treatment for patients with social anxiety disorder (SAD) or major depressive disorder (MDD), yet there is variability in clinical improvement. Though prior research suggests pre-treatment engagement of brain regions supporting cognitive reappraisal (e.g. dorsolateral prefrontal cortex [dlPFC]) foretells CBT response in SAD, it remains unknown if this extends to MDD or is specific to CBT. The current study examined associations between pre-treatment neural activity during reappraisal and clinical improvement in patients with SAD or MDD following a trial of CBT or supportive therapy (ST), a common-factors comparator arm.

Methods: Participants were 75 treatment-seeking patients with SAD (n = 34) or MDD (n = 41) randomized to CBT (n = 40) or ST (n = 35). Before randomization, patients completed a cognitive reappraisal task during functional magnetic resonance imaging. Additionally, patients completed clinician-administered symptom measures and a self-report cognitive reappraisal measure before treatment and every 2 weeks throughout treatment.

Results: Results indicated that pre-treatment neural activity during reappraisal differentially predicted CBT and ST response. Specifically, greater trajectories of symptom improvement throughout treatment were associated with less ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (vlPFC) activity for CBT patients, but more vlPFC activity for ST patients. Also, less baseline dlPFC activity corresponded with greater trajectories of self-reported reappraisal improvement, regardless of treatment arm.

Conclusions: If replicated, findings suggest individual differences in brain response during reappraisal may be transdiagnostically associated with treatment-dependent improvement in symptom severity, but improvement in subjective reappraisal following psychotherapy, more broadly.

社交焦虑症和重度抑郁症患者重评时的大脑活动及其与心理治疗反应的关系:随机试验。
背景:认知行为疗法(CBT)是治疗社交焦虑症(SAD)或重度抑郁障碍(MDD)患者的有效方法,但临床改善效果却不尽相同。尽管先前的研究表明,治疗前支持认知再评价的脑区(如背外侧前额叶皮层 [dlPFC])的参与预示着 SAD 患者对 CBT 的反应,但这种参与是否会延伸到 MDD 或特定于 CBT 仍是未知数。本研究考察了SAD或MDD患者在接受CBT或支持疗法(ST)试验后,在重新评估期间的治疗前神经活动与临床改善之间的关联:参与者为 75 名寻求治疗的 SAD(34 人)或 MDD(41 人)患者,他们被随机分配到 CBT(40 人)或 ST(35 人)治疗组。在随机化之前,患者在功能磁共振成像中完成了一项认知再评价任务。此外,患者在治疗前和整个治疗期间每两周完成一次临床医生管理的症状测量和自我报告的认知再评价测量:结果:结果表明,治疗前再评价过程中的神经活动对 CBT 和 ST 反应有不同的预测作用。具体来说,CBT 患者在整个治疗过程中症状改善的轨迹与较少的腹外侧前额叶皮层(vlPFC)活动有关,而 ST 患者则与较多的 vlPFC 活动有关。此外,无论采用哪种治疗方法,较少的基线前额叶皮层活动都与较大的自我评估改善轨迹相对应:如果研究结果得到证实,那么研究结果表明,重评过程中大脑反应的个体差异可能与症状严重程度的治疗依赖性改善以及心理治疗后主观重评的改善有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychological Medicine
Psychological Medicine 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
4.30%
发文量
711
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Now in its fifth decade of publication, Psychological Medicine is a leading international journal in the fields of psychiatry, related aspects of psychology and basic sciences. From 2014, there are 16 issues a year, each featuring original articles reporting key research being undertaken worldwide, together with shorter editorials by distinguished scholars and an important book review section. The journal''s success is clearly demonstrated by a consistently high impact factor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信