Comparison of drug-eluting bead with conventional transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombus: a randomized clinical trial.

IF 12.5 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Tan-Yang Zhou, Guo-Fang Tao, Guan-Hui Zhou, Yue-Lin Zhang, Tong-Yin Zhu, Sheng-Qun Chen, Hong-Liang Wang, Bao-Quan Wang, Li Jing, Feng Chen
{"title":"Comparison of drug-eluting bead with conventional transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombus: a randomized clinical trial.","authors":"Tan-Yang Zhou, Guo-Fang Tao, Guan-Hui Zhou, Yue-Lin Zhang, Tong-Yin Zhu, Sheng-Qun Chen, Hong-Liang Wang, Bao-Quan Wang, Li Jing, Feng Chen","doi":"10.1097/JS9.0000000000001691","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) has shown efficacy for treating hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT). However, whether DEB-TACE is superior to conventional TACE (cTACE) remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This randomized controlled trial aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of DEB-TACE versus cTACE in treating HCC with PVTT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study was conducted at a tertiary care center in Southeast China. HCC patients with PVTT were randomized at a 1:1 ratio into the DEB-TACE or cTACE groups. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and the incidence of adverse events (AEs). An independent review committee assessed the radiologic response according to the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST). AEs were assessed by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0. Systemic therapies were not restricted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between September 2018 and July 2020, 163 patients were randomized to undergo DEB-TACE ( n =82) or cTACE ( n =81). Nine patients were excluded, and 154 patients were included in the final analysis; the median age was 55 years (range, 24-78 years), and 140 (90.9%) were male. The median PFS in the DEB-TACE group was 6.0 months (95% CI, 5.0-10.0) versus 4.0 months (95% CI, 3.0-5.0) in the cTACE group (hazard ratio, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.42-0.95; P =0.027). The DEB-TACE group showed a higher response rate [51 (66.2%) vs. 36 (46.8%); P =0.0015] and a longer median OS [12.0 months (95% CI, 9.0-16.0) vs. 8.0 months (95% CI, 7.0-11.0), P =0.039] than the cTACE group. Multivariate analysis showed that the treatment group, ALBI score, distant metastasis and additional TKIs were the four independent prognostic factors correlated with PFS. In addition, the treatment group, PVTT group and combination with surgery were independently associated with OS. AEs were similar in the two groups, and postembolization syndrome was the most frequent AE.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DEB-TACE is superior to cTACE in treating HCC patients with PVTT, demonstrating improved PFS and OS with an acceptable safety profile, and may thus emerge as a promising treatment strategy for HCC patients with PVTT.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR1800018035.</p>","PeriodicalId":14401,"journal":{"name":"International journal of surgery","volume":" ","pages":"5527-5537"},"PeriodicalIF":12.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11392094/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000001691","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) has shown efficacy for treating hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT). However, whether DEB-TACE is superior to conventional TACE (cTACE) remains unclear.

Objective: This randomized controlled trial aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of DEB-TACE versus cTACE in treating HCC with PVTT.

Methods: The study was conducted at a tertiary care center in Southeast China. HCC patients with PVTT were randomized at a 1:1 ratio into the DEB-TACE or cTACE groups. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and the incidence of adverse events (AEs). An independent review committee assessed the radiologic response according to the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST). AEs were assessed by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0. Systemic therapies were not restricted.

Results: Between September 2018 and July 2020, 163 patients were randomized to undergo DEB-TACE ( n =82) or cTACE ( n =81). Nine patients were excluded, and 154 patients were included in the final analysis; the median age was 55 years (range, 24-78 years), and 140 (90.9%) were male. The median PFS in the DEB-TACE group was 6.0 months (95% CI, 5.0-10.0) versus 4.0 months (95% CI, 3.0-5.0) in the cTACE group (hazard ratio, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.42-0.95; P =0.027). The DEB-TACE group showed a higher response rate [51 (66.2%) vs. 36 (46.8%); P =0.0015] and a longer median OS [12.0 months (95% CI, 9.0-16.0) vs. 8.0 months (95% CI, 7.0-11.0), P =0.039] than the cTACE group. Multivariate analysis showed that the treatment group, ALBI score, distant metastasis and additional TKIs were the four independent prognostic factors correlated with PFS. In addition, the treatment group, PVTT group and combination with surgery were independently associated with OS. AEs were similar in the two groups, and postembolization syndrome was the most frequent AE.

Conclusion: DEB-TACE is superior to cTACE in treating HCC patients with PVTT, demonstrating improved PFS and OS with an acceptable safety profile, and may thus emerge as a promising treatment strategy for HCC patients with PVTT.

Trial registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR1800018035.

药物洗脱珠与传统经导管动脉化疗栓塞治疗伴有门静脉瘤栓的肝细胞癌的比较:随机临床试验。
背景:药物洗脱珠经动脉化疗栓塞术(DEB-TACE)已显示出治疗伴有门静脉肿瘤血栓(PVTT)的肝细胞癌(HCC)的疗效。然而,DEB-TACE 是否优于传统 TACE(cTACE)仍不清楚:这项随机对照试验旨在比较 DEB-TACE 和 cTACE 治疗伴有 PVTT 的 HCC 的疗效和安全性:研究在中国东南部的一家三级医疗中心进行。PVTT的HCC患者按1:1的比例随机分为DEB-TACE组和cTACE组。主要终点为无进展生存期(PFS),次要终点为总生存期(OS)和不良事件(AEs)发生率。独立审查委员会根据改良的实体瘤反应评估标准(mRECIST)评估放射学反应。不良反应根据不良事件通用术语标准(CTCAE)4.0版进行评估。系统疗法不受限制:2018年9月至2020年7月期间,163名患者随机接受了DEB-TACE(82人)或cTACE(81人)治疗。9名患者被排除在外,154名患者纳入最终分析;中位年龄为55岁(范围为24-78岁),140名患者(90.9%)为男性。DEB-TACE 组的中位 PFS 为 6.0 个月(95% CI,5.0 至 10.0),而 cTACE 组为 4.0 个月(95% CI,3.0 至 5.0)(危险比为 0.63;95% CI,0.42 至 0.95;P=0.027)。与cTACE组相比,DEB-TACE组的反应率更高(51[66.2%] vs. 36 [46.8%];P=0.0015),中位OS更长(12.0个月 [95% CI, 9.0 to 16.0] vs. 8.0个月 [95% CI, 7.0 to 11.0],P=0.039)。多变量分析显示,治疗组、ALBI评分、远处转移和额外的TKIs是与PFS相关的四个独立预后因素。此外,治疗组、PVTT组和联合手术组与OS独立相关。两组的AEs相似,栓塞后综合征是最常见的AEs:结论:DEB-TACE治疗PVTT HCC患者的PFS和OS改善,安全性可接受,优于cTACE,可能成为PVTT HCC患者的一种有前途的治疗策略:中国临床试验注册中心 ChiCTR1800018035.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
17.70
自引率
3.30%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Surgery (IJS) has a broad scope, encompassing all surgical specialties. Its primary objective is to facilitate the exchange of crucial ideas and lines of thought between and across these specialties.By doing so, the journal aims to counter the growing trend of increasing sub-specialization, which can result in "tunnel-vision" and the isolation of significant surgical advancements within specific specialties.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信