[Rehabilitation success after psychosomatic rehabilitation as a function of psychotherapy dose].

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Kirsten Rotter, Bernhard Koch, Alexandra Lambrecht, Axel Kobelt-Pönicke
{"title":"[Rehabilitation success after psychosomatic rehabilitation as a function of psychotherapy dose].","authors":"Kirsten Rotter, Bernhard Koch, Alexandra Lambrecht, Axel Kobelt-Pönicke","doi":"10.1007/s00103-024-03898-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Increasing the effectiveness of psychosomatic rehabilitation by prolonging the treatment is a subject of controversial debate. The number of sessions over time defines the dosage in psychotherapy. While the dose-response model assumes an optimal therapy dose, the good-enough level model assumes a correlation of the rate of change with the total sessions. A randomized control group study was conducted to investigate the extent to which an adaptive therapy concept with a two-week intensive phase and early intervention could increase rehabilitation success.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A total of 494 rehabilitants between the ages of 21 and 64 (47% women) who completed a classical or an integrative psychosomatic rehabilitation at the Rehazentrum Oberharz between 2020 and 2022 were analysed. Rehabilitation success was mapped by the Reliable Change Index of individual symptom reduction (depression severity or psychological and somatoform disorders) and as a socio-medical parameter (physician's assessment of potential work ability (WA) after two weeks). Two-factorial ANOVAs and hierarchical binary logistic regressions were calculated, and sick leave before rehabilitation was statistically controlled.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Dosage showed no effect on symptom reduction (p = 0.29) and potential WA after two weeks (p = 0.90). However, when stratified by disease severity, there was a mean effect of dosage (p = 0.05) and twice the probability of WA after two weeks (odds 2.13; p = 0.01) for those with mild disease at the start of measure (p = 0.05).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>In the early stages of an affective disorder, early and intensified intervention can counteract the chronification of mental disorders.</p>","PeriodicalId":9562,"journal":{"name":"Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz","volume":" ","pages":"824-832"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00103-024-03898-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Increasing the effectiveness of psychosomatic rehabilitation by prolonging the treatment is a subject of controversial debate. The number of sessions over time defines the dosage in psychotherapy. While the dose-response model assumes an optimal therapy dose, the good-enough level model assumes a correlation of the rate of change with the total sessions. A randomized control group study was conducted to investigate the extent to which an adaptive therapy concept with a two-week intensive phase and early intervention could increase rehabilitation success.

Method: A total of 494 rehabilitants between the ages of 21 and 64 (47% women) who completed a classical or an integrative psychosomatic rehabilitation at the Rehazentrum Oberharz between 2020 and 2022 were analysed. Rehabilitation success was mapped by the Reliable Change Index of individual symptom reduction (depression severity or psychological and somatoform disorders) and as a socio-medical parameter (physician's assessment of potential work ability (WA) after two weeks). Two-factorial ANOVAs and hierarchical binary logistic regressions were calculated, and sick leave before rehabilitation was statistically controlled.

Results: Dosage showed no effect on symptom reduction (p = 0.29) and potential WA after two weeks (p = 0.90). However, when stratified by disease severity, there was a mean effect of dosage (p = 0.05) and twice the probability of WA after two weeks (odds 2.13; p = 0.01) for those with mild disease at the start of measure (p = 0.05).

Discussion: In the early stages of an affective disorder, early and intensified intervention can counteract the chronification of mental disorders.

[心身康复后的康复成功与心理治疗剂量的关系]。
背景:通过延长治疗时间来提高心身康复的效果是一个有争议的话题。长期治疗的次数决定了心理治疗的剂量。剂量反应模型假定最佳治疗剂量,而足够好的水平模型则假定变化率与总疗程相关。我们进行了一项随机对照小组研究,以探讨为期两周的强化阶段和早期干预的适应性治疗理念能在多大程度上提高康复成功率:分析了2020年至2022年期间在上哈尔茨康复中心完成经典或综合心身康复治疗的494名21至64岁的康复者(47%为女性)。康复成功与否通过个人症状减轻的可靠变化指数(抑郁严重程度或心理和躯体形式障碍)和社会医疗参数(两周后医生对潜在工作能力(WA)的评估)来衡量。计算了两因素方差分析和分层二元逻辑回归,并对康复前的病假进行了统计控制:结果:剂量对症状减轻(p = 0.29)和两周后的潜在 WA(p = 0.90)没有影响。然而,如果按疾病严重程度进行分层,则剂量会产生平均效应(p = 0.05),两周后,轻度患者的加权平均病程概率是开始测量时的两倍(几率为 2.13;p = 0.01)(p = 0.05):讨论:在情感障碍的早期阶段,早期加强干预可以抵消精神障碍的慢性化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz
Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.90%
发文量
145
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Die Monatszeitschrift Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz - umfasst alle Fragestellungen und Bereiche, mit denen sich das öffentliche Gesundheitswesen und die staatliche Gesundheitspolitik auseinandersetzen. Ziel ist es, zum einen über wesentliche Entwicklungen in der biologisch-medizinischen Grundlagenforschung auf dem Laufenden zu halten und zum anderen über konkrete Maßnahmen zum Gesundheitsschutz, über Konzepte der Prävention, Risikoabwehr und Gesundheitsförderung zu informieren. Wichtige Themengebiete sind die Epidemiologie übertragbarer und nicht übertragbarer Krankheiten, der umweltbezogene Gesundheitsschutz sowie gesundheitsökonomische, medizinethische und -rechtliche Fragestellungen.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信