Near-Surface Rayleigh Wave Dispersion Curve Inversion Algorithms: A Comprehensive Comparison

IF 4.9 2区 地球科学 Q1 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
Xiao-Hui Yang, Yuanyuan Zhou, Peng Han, Xuping Feng, Xiaofei Chen
{"title":"Near-Surface Rayleigh Wave Dispersion Curve Inversion Algorithms: A Comprehensive Comparison","authors":"Xiao-Hui Yang,&nbsp;Yuanyuan Zhou,&nbsp;Peng Han,&nbsp;Xuping Feng,&nbsp;Xiaofei Chen","doi":"10.1007/s10712-024-09826-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Rayleigh wave exploration is a powerful method for estimating near-surface shear-wave (S-wave) velocities, providing valuable insights into the stiffness properties of subsurface materials inside the Earth. The dispersion curve inversion of Rayleigh wave corresponds to the optimization process of searching for the optimal solutions of earth model parameters based on the measured dispersion curves. At present, diversified inversion algorithms have been introduced into the process of Rayleigh wave inversion. However, limited studies have been conducted to uncover the variations in inversion performance among commonly used inversion algorithms. To obtain a comprehensive understanding of the optimization performance of these inversion algorithms, we systematically investigate and quantitatively assess the inversion performance of two bionic algorithms, two probabilistic algorithms, a gradient-based algorithm, and two neural network algorithms. The evaluation indices include the computational cost, accuracy, stability, generalization ability, noise effects, and field data processing capability. It is found that the Bound-constrained limited-memory Broyden–Fletcher–Goldfarb–Shanno (L-BFGS-B) algorithm and the broad learning (BL) network have the lowest computational cost among candidate algorithms. Furthermore, the transitional Markov Chain Monte Carlo algorithm, deep learning (DL) network, and BL network outperform the other four algorithms regarding accuracy, stability, resistance to noise effects, and capability to process field data. The DL and BL networks demonstrate the highest level of generalization compared to the other algorithms. The comparison results reveal the variations in candidate algorithms for the inversion task, causing a clear understanding of the inversion performance of candidate algorithms. This study can promote the S-wave velocity estimation by Rayleigh wave inversion.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49458,"journal":{"name":"Surveys in Geophysics","volume":"45 3","pages":"773 - 818"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10712-024-09826-y.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surveys in Geophysics","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10712-024-09826-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rayleigh wave exploration is a powerful method for estimating near-surface shear-wave (S-wave) velocities, providing valuable insights into the stiffness properties of subsurface materials inside the Earth. The dispersion curve inversion of Rayleigh wave corresponds to the optimization process of searching for the optimal solutions of earth model parameters based on the measured dispersion curves. At present, diversified inversion algorithms have been introduced into the process of Rayleigh wave inversion. However, limited studies have been conducted to uncover the variations in inversion performance among commonly used inversion algorithms. To obtain a comprehensive understanding of the optimization performance of these inversion algorithms, we systematically investigate and quantitatively assess the inversion performance of two bionic algorithms, two probabilistic algorithms, a gradient-based algorithm, and two neural network algorithms. The evaluation indices include the computational cost, accuracy, stability, generalization ability, noise effects, and field data processing capability. It is found that the Bound-constrained limited-memory Broyden–Fletcher–Goldfarb–Shanno (L-BFGS-B) algorithm and the broad learning (BL) network have the lowest computational cost among candidate algorithms. Furthermore, the transitional Markov Chain Monte Carlo algorithm, deep learning (DL) network, and BL network outperform the other four algorithms regarding accuracy, stability, resistance to noise effects, and capability to process field data. The DL and BL networks demonstrate the highest level of generalization compared to the other algorithms. The comparison results reveal the variations in candidate algorithms for the inversion task, causing a clear understanding of the inversion performance of candidate algorithms. This study can promote the S-wave velocity estimation by Rayleigh wave inversion.

Abstract Image

近表面瑞利波频散曲线反演算法:综合比较
瑞利波探测是一种估算近地表剪切波(S 波)速度的强大方法,可为了解地球内部地下材料的刚度特性提供宝贵的信息。雷利波频散曲线反演相当于根据测得的频散曲线寻找地球模型参数最优解的优化过程。目前,已有多种反演算法被引入到瑞利波反演过程中。然而,对常用反演算法之间反演性能差异的研究还很有限。为了全面了解这些反演算法的优化性能,我们对两种仿生算法、两种概率算法、一种基于梯度的算法和两种神经网络算法的反演性能进行了系统研究和定量评估。评价指标包括计算成本、精度、稳定性、泛化能力、噪声影响和现场数据处理能力。结果发现,在候选算法中,有界约束的有限内存 Broyden-Fletcher-Goldfarb-Shanno 算法(L-BFGS-B)和广义学习(BL)网络的计算成本最低。此外,过渡马尔可夫链蒙特卡洛算法、深度学习(DL)网络和广义学习(BL)网络在准确性、稳定性、抗噪声影响和处理现场数据的能力方面都优于其他四种算法。与其他算法相比,DL 和 BL 网络的泛化程度最高。比较结果揭示了反演任务中候选算法的差异,使人们对候选算法的反演性能有了清晰的认识。这项研究可促进通过瑞利波反演估算 S 波速度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Surveys in Geophysics
Surveys in Geophysics 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
10.90%
发文量
64
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: Surveys in Geophysics publishes refereed review articles on the physical, chemical and biological processes occurring within the Earth, on its surface, in its atmosphere and in the near-Earth space environment, including relations with other bodies in the solar system. Observations, their interpretation, theory and modelling are covered in papers dealing with any of the Earth and space sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信