A comparison of changes in drug burden index between older inpatients who fell and people who have not fallen: A case-control study.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Australasian Journal on Ageing Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-21 DOI:10.1111/ajag.13333
Claire E T O'Leary, Timothy J Wilkinson, H Carl Hanger
{"title":"A comparison of changes in drug burden index between older inpatients who fell and people who have not fallen: A case-control study.","authors":"Claire E T O'Leary, Timothy J Wilkinson, H Carl Hanger","doi":"10.1111/ajag.13333","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Older inpatients who fall are often frail, with multiple co-morbidities and polypharmacy. Although the causes of falls are multifactorial, sedating and delirium-inducing drugs increase that risk. The aims were to determine whether people who fell had a change in their sedative and anticholinergic medication burden during an admission compared to people who did not fall. A secondary aim was to determine the factors associated with change in drug burden.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective, observational, case-control study of inpatients who fell. Two hundred consecutive people who fell were compared with 200 randomly selected people who had not fallen. Demographics, functional ability, frailty and cognition were recorded. For each patient, their total medications and anticholinergic and sedative burden were calculated on admission and on discharge, using the drug burden index (DBI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>People who fell were more dependent and cognitively impaired than people who did not fallen. People who fell had a higher DBI on admission, than people who had not fall (mean: .69 vs .43, respectively, p < .001) and discharge (.66 vs .38, p < .001). For both cohorts, the DBI decreased between admission and discharge (-.03 and -.05), but neither were clinically significant. Higher total medications and a higher number DBI medications on admission were both associated with greater DBI changes (p = .003 and <.001, respectively). However, the presence (or absence) of cognitive impairment, dependency, frailty and single vs multiple falls were not significantly associated with DBI changes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In older people, DBI medications and falls are both common and have serious consequences, yet this study was unable to demonstrate any clinically relevant reduction in average DBI either in people who fell or people who had not fallen during a hospital admission.</p>","PeriodicalId":55431,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal on Ageing","volume":" ","pages":"706-714"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11671710/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Journal on Ageing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ajag.13333","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Older inpatients who fall are often frail, with multiple co-morbidities and polypharmacy. Although the causes of falls are multifactorial, sedating and delirium-inducing drugs increase that risk. The aims were to determine whether people who fell had a change in their sedative and anticholinergic medication burden during an admission compared to people who did not fall. A secondary aim was to determine the factors associated with change in drug burden.

Methods: A retrospective, observational, case-control study of inpatients who fell. Two hundred consecutive people who fell were compared with 200 randomly selected people who had not fallen. Demographics, functional ability, frailty and cognition were recorded. For each patient, their total medications and anticholinergic and sedative burden were calculated on admission and on discharge, using the drug burden index (DBI).

Results: People who fell were more dependent and cognitively impaired than people who did not fallen. People who fell had a higher DBI on admission, than people who had not fall (mean: .69 vs .43, respectively, p < .001) and discharge (.66 vs .38, p < .001). For both cohorts, the DBI decreased between admission and discharge (-.03 and -.05), but neither were clinically significant. Higher total medications and a higher number DBI medications on admission were both associated with greater DBI changes (p = .003 and <.001, respectively). However, the presence (or absence) of cognitive impairment, dependency, frailty and single vs multiple falls were not significantly associated with DBI changes.

Conclusions: In older people, DBI medications and falls are both common and have serious consequences, yet this study was unable to demonstrate any clinically relevant reduction in average DBI either in people who fell or people who had not fallen during a hospital admission.

跌倒的老年住院病人与未跌倒者药物负担指数变化的比较:病例对照研究。
目的:跌倒的老年住院病人通常身体虚弱,患有多种并发症和多种药物。虽然跌倒的原因是多方面的,但镇静和谵妄诱导药物会增加跌倒的风险。研究的目的是确定与未跌倒的患者相比,跌倒患者在入院期间的镇静和抗胆碱能药物负担是否发生了变化。另一个目的是确定与药物负担变化相关的因素:对跌倒的住院病人进行回顾性、观察性、病例对照研究。连续 200 名跌倒患者与随机抽取的 200 名未跌倒患者进行了比较。研究记录了患者的人口统计学特征、功能能力、虚弱程度和认知能力。使用药物负担指数(DBI)计算了每位患者入院和出院时的药物总量以及抗胆碱能药物和镇静剂的负担:结果:与未跌倒的患者相比,跌倒患者的依赖性和认知能力受损程度更高。跌倒者入院时的药物负担指数高于未跌倒者(平均值分别为 0.69 和 0.43,P 结论:跌倒者入院时的药物负担指数高于未跌倒者(平均值分别为 0.69 和 0.43,P 结论):在老年人中,DBI 药物和跌倒都很常见,并会造成严重后果,但这项研究无法证明在入院期间跌倒或未跌倒的人的平均 DBI 有任何临床相关性的降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Australasian Journal on Ageing
Australasian Journal on Ageing 医学-老年医学
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
114
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Australasian Journal on Ageing is a peer reviewed journal, which publishes original work in any area of gerontology and geriatric medicine. It welcomes international submissions, particularly from authors in the Asia Pacific region.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信