Striving for Improved Infection Prevention and Control Practice: A Grounded Theory of Healthcare Workers' Struggles in Implementing Infection Prevention and Control Guidance in Uganda.

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Qualitative Health Research Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-20 DOI:10.1177/10497323241242660
Andrew O Kalule, Kay Currie, Lesley Price
{"title":"Striving for Improved Infection Prevention and Control Practice: A Grounded Theory of Healthcare Workers' Struggles in Implementing Infection Prevention and Control Guidance in Uganda.","authors":"Andrew O Kalule, Kay Currie, Lesley Price","doi":"10.1177/10497323241242660","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There is a scarcity of qualitative research focusing on the implementation of infection prevention and control (IPC) guidance in low-income countries. This study aimed to address this gap by exploring the perspectives of healthcare workers (HCWs) regarding the implementation of IPC guidance at the healthcare facility level in Uganda. The study also sought to generate a theoretical understanding of the processes involved in implementing IPC guidance in these settings. This robust qualitative research employed a design based on constructivist grounded theory methodology, conducting individual interviews with 13 frontline health workers such as doctors, nurses, nurse interns, and laboratory staff. The key findings of the study revealed that HCWs undergo a process of 'striving for improved practice' in their efforts to implement IPC guidance. This process involved four phases: recognising the importance of IPC, playing a role, encountering challenges, and overcoming challenges. However, achieving full implementation proved difficult due to various individual and organisational barriers presented by the low-income setting. HCWs employed improvisation as a means to overcome these obstacles. Additionally, the study identified enabling factors that facilitated the implementation of IPC guidance within these settings. This study is significant as it applies robust qualitative research methods to provide valuable evidence of HCWs' perspectives on an important topic in an under-researched context, with findings transferable to similar settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":48437,"journal":{"name":"Qualitative Health Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Qualitative Health Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10497323241242660","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is a scarcity of qualitative research focusing on the implementation of infection prevention and control (IPC) guidance in low-income countries. This study aimed to address this gap by exploring the perspectives of healthcare workers (HCWs) regarding the implementation of IPC guidance at the healthcare facility level in Uganda. The study also sought to generate a theoretical understanding of the processes involved in implementing IPC guidance in these settings. This robust qualitative research employed a design based on constructivist grounded theory methodology, conducting individual interviews with 13 frontline health workers such as doctors, nurses, nurse interns, and laboratory staff. The key findings of the study revealed that HCWs undergo a process of 'striving for improved practice' in their efforts to implement IPC guidance. This process involved four phases: recognising the importance of IPC, playing a role, encountering challenges, and overcoming challenges. However, achieving full implementation proved difficult due to various individual and organisational barriers presented by the low-income setting. HCWs employed improvisation as a means to overcome these obstacles. Additionally, the study identified enabling factors that facilitated the implementation of IPC guidance within these settings. This study is significant as it applies robust qualitative research methods to provide valuable evidence of HCWs' perspectives on an important topic in an under-researched context, with findings transferable to similar settings.

努力改进感染预防与控制实践:乌干达医护人员在实施感染预防与控制指南过程中的挣扎的基础理论》(A Ground Theory of Healthcare Workers' Struggles in Implementing Infection Prevention and Control Guidance in Uganda)。
针对低收入国家实施感染预防与控制 (IPC) 指南的定性研究十分稀少。本研究旨在通过探讨乌干达医疗机构中医护人员(HCWs)对实施 IPC 指南的看法来填补这一空白。本研究还试图从理论上理解在这些环境中实施 IPC 指南的过程。这项稳健的定性研究采用了基于建构主义基础理论方法的设计,对 13 名一线卫生工作者(如医生、护士、实习护士和实验室工作人员)进行了个别访谈。研究的主要结果显示,医护人员在努力实施 IPC 指南的过程中经历了一个 "努力改进实践 "的过程。这一过程包括四个阶段:认识到 IPC 的重要性、发挥作用、遇到挑战和克服挑战。然而,由于低收入环境给个人和组织带来的各种障碍,要实现全面实施非常困难。医护人员采用了即兴表演的方式来克服这些障碍。此外,研究还发现了在这些环境中促进实施 IPC 指南的有利因素。这项研究意义重大,因为它采用了强有力的定性研究方法,为医护人员在研究不足的背景下对一个重要主题的看法提供了宝贵的证据,而且研究结果也可应用于类似的环境中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
6.20%
发文量
109
期刊介绍: QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH is an international, interdisciplinary, refereed journal for the enhancement of health care and to further the development and understanding of qualitative research methods in health care settings. We welcome manuscripts in the following areas: the description and analysis of the illness experience, health and health-seeking behaviors, the experiences of caregivers, the sociocultural organization of health care, health care policy, and related topics. We also seek critical reviews and commentaries addressing conceptual, theoretical, methodological, and ethical issues pertaining to qualitative enquiry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信