Hyperpure chlorine dioxide versus chlorhexidine in intra-oral halitosis (ODOR trial) - protocol of a double-blinded, double-arm, parallel non-inferiority pilot randomized controlled trial.

IF 2.5 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Eszter Ágnes Szalai, Brigitta Teutsch, Viktória Babay, Adél Galvács, Péter Hegyi, Péter Hársfalvi, Róbert Pál, Gábor Varga, Zsolt M Lohinai, Beáta Kerémi
{"title":"Hyperpure chlorine dioxide versus chlorhexidine in intra-oral halitosis (ODOR trial) - protocol of a double-blinded, double-arm, parallel non-inferiority pilot randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Eszter Ágnes Szalai, Brigitta Teutsch, Viktória Babay, Adél Galvács, Péter Hegyi, Péter Hársfalvi, Róbert Pál, Gábor Varga, Zsolt M Lohinai, Beáta Kerémi","doi":"10.1038/s41405-024-00221-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Intra-oral halitosis (IOH) is the most common type of bad breath; its consequences impair quality of life. However, evidence-based treatment protocols and guidelines are lacking. Our aim is to investigate the effectiveness of chlorine dioxide as an applicable complementary treatment modality in IOH after tongue cleaning.</p><p><strong>Methods and analysis: </strong>The ODOR trial will be a single-center, double-blinded, parallel-group, double-armed pilot randomized controlled trial with a non-inferiority design. The efficacy of hyperpure chlorine dioxide will be compared to chlorhexidine mouthwash. We plan to investigate the short-term effects of the intervention over a 3-h period. The primary endpoint will be changes in organoleptic test scores. At the end of the pilot investigation of the first 30 patients each, sample size calculation will be performed. If feasible, the investigators will continue the study by enrolling more patients.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The trial has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06219226).</p>","PeriodicalId":36997,"journal":{"name":"BDJ Open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11106080/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BDJ Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41405-024-00221-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Intra-oral halitosis (IOH) is the most common type of bad breath; its consequences impair quality of life. However, evidence-based treatment protocols and guidelines are lacking. Our aim is to investigate the effectiveness of chlorine dioxide as an applicable complementary treatment modality in IOH after tongue cleaning.

Methods and analysis: The ODOR trial will be a single-center, double-blinded, parallel-group, double-armed pilot randomized controlled trial with a non-inferiority design. The efficacy of hyperpure chlorine dioxide will be compared to chlorhexidine mouthwash. We plan to investigate the short-term effects of the intervention over a 3-h period. The primary endpoint will be changes in organoleptic test scores. At the end of the pilot investigation of the first 30 patients each, sample size calculation will be performed. If feasible, the investigators will continue the study by enrolling more patients.

Trial registration: The trial has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06219226).

超纯二氧化氯与洗必泰治疗口内口臭(ODOR 试验)--双盲、双臂、平行非劣效性随机对照试验方案。
简介口内口臭(IOH)是最常见的口臭类型,其后果会影响人们的生活质量。然而,目前还缺乏循证治疗方案和指南。我们的目的是研究二氧化氯作为一种适用于舌清洁后口腔内口臭的辅助治疗方式的有效性:ODOR试验将是一项单中心、双盲、平行组、双臂试验性随机对照试验,采用非劣效性设计。超纯二氧化氯的功效将与洗必泰漱口水进行比较。我们计划在 3 小时内调查干预措施的短期效果。主要终点是感官测试评分的变化。在对首批各 30 名患者的试点调查结束后,将对样本量进行计算。如果可行,研究人员将招募更多患者继续研究:试验已在 ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06219226) 上注册。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BDJ Open
BDJ Open Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
3.30%
发文量
34
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信