Chronic Use of Antihypertensive Medications and Peak Exercise Blood Pressure in Adult Men and Women from the BALL ST Cohort.

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES
Emily Idzik, Mary T Imboden, James E Peterman, Mitchell H Whaley, Leonard A Kaminsky, Bradley S Fleenor, Matthew P Harber
{"title":"Chronic Use of Antihypertensive Medications and Peak Exercise Blood Pressure in Adult Men and Women from the BALL ST Cohort.","authors":"Emily Idzik, Mary T Imboden, James E Peterman, Mitchell H Whaley, Leonard A Kaminsky, Bradley S Fleenor, Matthew P Harber","doi":"10.1249/MSS.0000000000003476","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To determine if individuals chronically (>1 yr) prescribed antihypertensive medications have a normal BP response to peak exercise compared with unmedicated individuals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants included 2555 adults from the Ball State Adult Fitness Longitudinal Lifestyle STudy cohort who performed a peak treadmill exercise test. Participants were divided into groups by sex and antihypertensive medication status. Individuals prescribed antihypertensive medications for >1 yr were included. Exaggerated and blunted SBP within each group was categorized using the Fitness Registry and the Importance of Exercise: A National Database (FRIEND) and absolute criteria as noted by the American Heart Association.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The unmedicated group had a greater prevalence ( P < 0.05) of blunted SBP responses, whereas the medicated group had a higher prevalence ( P < 0.05) of exaggerated SBP responses using both the FRIEND and absolute criteria. Peak SBP was higher ( P < 0.01) in medicated compared with unmedicated participants in the overall cohort when controlling for age and sex, but not after controlling for resting SBP ( P = 0.613), risk factors ( P = 0.104), or cardiorespiratory fitness ( P = 0.191). When men and women were assessed independently, peak SBP remained higher in the medicated women after controlling for age and resting SBP ( P = 0.039), but not for men ( P = 0.311). Individuals on beta-blockers had a higher peak SBP even after controlling for age, sex, risk factors, and cardiorespiratory fitness ( P = 0.022).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Individuals on antihypertensive medications have a higher peak SBP response to exercise. Given the prognostic value of exaggerated peak SBP, control of exercise BP should be considered in routine BP assessment and in the treatment of hypertension.</p>","PeriodicalId":18426,"journal":{"name":"Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise","volume":" ","pages":"1694-1700"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000003476","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To determine if individuals chronically (>1 yr) prescribed antihypertensive medications have a normal BP response to peak exercise compared with unmedicated individuals.

Methods: Participants included 2555 adults from the Ball State Adult Fitness Longitudinal Lifestyle STudy cohort who performed a peak treadmill exercise test. Participants were divided into groups by sex and antihypertensive medication status. Individuals prescribed antihypertensive medications for >1 yr were included. Exaggerated and blunted SBP within each group was categorized using the Fitness Registry and the Importance of Exercise: A National Database (FRIEND) and absolute criteria as noted by the American Heart Association.

Results: The unmedicated group had a greater prevalence ( P < 0.05) of blunted SBP responses, whereas the medicated group had a higher prevalence ( P < 0.05) of exaggerated SBP responses using both the FRIEND and absolute criteria. Peak SBP was higher ( P < 0.01) in medicated compared with unmedicated participants in the overall cohort when controlling for age and sex, but not after controlling for resting SBP ( P = 0.613), risk factors ( P = 0.104), or cardiorespiratory fitness ( P = 0.191). When men and women were assessed independently, peak SBP remained higher in the medicated women after controlling for age and resting SBP ( P = 0.039), but not for men ( P = 0.311). Individuals on beta-blockers had a higher peak SBP even after controlling for age, sex, risk factors, and cardiorespiratory fitness ( P = 0.022).

Conclusions: Individuals on antihypertensive medications have a higher peak SBP response to exercise. Given the prognostic value of exaggerated peak SBP, control of exercise BP should be considered in routine BP assessment and in the treatment of hypertension.

BALL ST 队列中成年男性和女性长期服用抗高血压药物与运动血压峰值的关系。
目的:确定与未服药者相比,长期(超过 1 年)服用降压药的人对运动峰值的血压反应是否正常:参与者包括波尔州立大学成人健身纵向生活方式研究队列中的 2555 名成年人,他们都进行了跑步机运动峰值测试。按照性别和服用降压药情况将参与者分为几组。其中包括服用降压药超过一年的人。使用体能登记和运动重要性对各组中的 SBP 过高和过低进行分类:结果显示,未用药组的 SBP 高于用药组:结果:根据 FRIEND 和绝对标准,未用药组 SBP 反应迟钝的发生率更高(P < 0.05),而用药组 SBP 反应夸张的发生率更高(P < 0.05)。在总体队列中,控制年龄和性别后,用药组患者的峰值 SBP 高于未用药组患者(p < 0.01),但在控制静息 SBP(p = 0.613)、风险因素(p = 0.104)或心肺功能(p = 0.191)后,用药组患者的峰值 SBP 则低于未用药组患者(p < 0.01)。当对男性和女性进行独立评估时,在控制了年龄和静息 SBP(p = 0.039)后,服药女性的峰值 SBP 仍然较高,但男性则不然(p = 0.311)。即使在控制了年龄、性别、风险因素和心肺功能后,服用β-受体阻滞剂的人的SBP峰值仍然较高(p = 0.022):结论:服用降压药的人对运动的 SBP 峰值反应较高。结论:服用降压药的人运动时的 SBP 峰值反应更高。考虑到 SBP 峰值升高的预后价值,在常规血压评估和高血压治疗中应考虑控制运动血压。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
4.90%
发文量
2568
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise® features original investigations, clinical studies, and comprehensive reviews on current topics in sports medicine and exercise science. With this leading multidisciplinary journal, exercise physiologists, physiatrists, physical therapists, team physicians, and athletic trainers get a vital exchange of information from basic and applied science, medicine, education, and allied health fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信