Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Data Collection in Cancer Care: A Nationwide Landscape Assessment Update.

IF 4.7 3区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
JCO oncology practice Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-20 DOI:10.1200/OP.23.00724
Elizabeth J Cathcart-Rake, Aminah Jatoi, Emily V Dressler, Carol Kittel, Kathryn E Weaver, Chandylen Nightingale, Heather Neuman, Kah Poh Loh, Charles Kamen
{"title":"Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Data Collection in Cancer Care: A Nationwide Landscape Assessment Update.","authors":"Elizabeth J Cathcart-Rake, Aminah Jatoi, Emily V Dressler, Carol Kittel, Kathryn E Weaver, Chandylen Nightingale, Heather Neuman, Kah Poh Loh, Charles Kamen","doi":"10.1200/OP.23.00724","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Routine collection of sexual orientation (SO) and gender identity (GI; collectively SOGI) in cancer clinics advances cancer care equity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In 2022, NCI Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP) practice groups were asked about routine collection of SOGI data in the electronic health record. The proportions of practice groups reporting collection of SO and/or GI data were calculated, and practice group characteristics were assessed for associations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 271 practice groups nationwide, 42% (n = 112) collect SO data, 58% (n = 157) collect GI data, and 35% (n = 96) collect both. In multivariate analyses, SO data collection was associated with practice groups having minority outreach staff (odds ratio [OR], 2.07 [95% CI, 1.12 to 3.81]; <i>P</i> = .02); GI data collection was associated with practice groups located in the Northeastern United States (OR, 2.08 [95% CI, 0.73 to 5.91]; <i>P</i> = .045), and those with a higher proportion of new patients who were White (OR, 1.02 [95% CI, 1.01 to 1.04]; <i>P</i> < .001). Practice groups in the South were least likely to collect SOGI data (OR, 0.49 [95% CI, 0.26 to 0.94]; <i>P</i> = .004). There were no statistically significant differences in SO and/or GI collection on the basis of the practice group's proportion of Medicaid/Medicare patients, number of new patients with cancer per year, or practice ownership.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Slightly over one third of NCORP practice groups report routinely collecting SOGI data. There are regional differences in data collection, underscoring the need to craft targeted, region-specific interventions focused on boosting the capture and recording of SOGI data in an affirming manner.</p>","PeriodicalId":14612,"journal":{"name":"JCO oncology practice","volume":" ","pages":"1272-1279"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCO oncology practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/OP.23.00724","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Routine collection of sexual orientation (SO) and gender identity (GI; collectively SOGI) in cancer clinics advances cancer care equity.

Methods: In 2022, NCI Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP) practice groups were asked about routine collection of SOGI data in the electronic health record. The proportions of practice groups reporting collection of SO and/or GI data were calculated, and practice group characteristics were assessed for associations.

Results: Of 271 practice groups nationwide, 42% (n = 112) collect SO data, 58% (n = 157) collect GI data, and 35% (n = 96) collect both. In multivariate analyses, SO data collection was associated with practice groups having minority outreach staff (odds ratio [OR], 2.07 [95% CI, 1.12 to 3.81]; P = .02); GI data collection was associated with practice groups located in the Northeastern United States (OR, 2.08 [95% CI, 0.73 to 5.91]; P = .045), and those with a higher proportion of new patients who were White (OR, 1.02 [95% CI, 1.01 to 1.04]; P < .001). Practice groups in the South were least likely to collect SOGI data (OR, 0.49 [95% CI, 0.26 to 0.94]; P = .004). There were no statistically significant differences in SO and/or GI collection on the basis of the practice group's proportion of Medicaid/Medicare patients, number of new patients with cancer per year, or practice ownership.

Conclusion: Slightly over one third of NCORP practice groups report routinely collecting SOGI data. There are regional differences in data collection, underscoring the need to craft targeted, region-specific interventions focused on boosting the capture and recording of SOGI data in an affirming manner.

癌症护理中的性取向和性别认同数据收集:全国范围的景观评估更新。
目的在癌症诊所常规收集性取向(SO)和性别认同(GI;统称 SOGI)数据可促进癌症护理公平:2022年,NCI社区肿瘤学研究项目(NCORP)的实践小组被问及在电子健康记录中常规收集SOGI数据的情况。结果:在全国 271 个实践小组中,有 271 个实践小组报告收集了 SO 和/或 GI 数据:在全国 271 个实践小组中,42%(n = 112)收集了 SO 数据,58%(n = 157)收集了 GI 数据,35%(n = 96)同时收集了这两种数据。在多变量分析中,SO 数据收集与拥有少数族裔外联人员的医疗机构有关(几率比 [OR],2.07 [95% CI,1.12 至 3.81];P = .02);GI 数据收集与位于美国东北部的医疗机构有关(OR,2.08 [95% CI,0.73 至 5.91];P = .045),以及那些白人新患者比例较高的医疗机构有关(OR,1.02 [95% CI,1.01 至 1.04];P < .001)。南部地区的医疗机构最不可能收集SOGI数据(OR,0.49 [95% CI,0.26 至 0.94];P = .004)。根据医疗补助/医疗保险患者的比例、每年新增癌症患者的数量或医疗机构的所有权,医疗机构在收集SO和/或GI数据方面没有明显的统计学差异:结论:略超过三分之一的 NCORP 诊疗小组表示会定期收集 SOGI 数据。数据收集方面存在地区差异,这说明有必要制定有针对性的地区干预措施,重点是以肯定的方式促进性别平等数据的收集和记录。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
7.50%
发文量
518
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信