Analysis of Distribution and Drug Susceptibility Test Results of Pathogenic Bacteria in Diabetic Foot Ulcers.

IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q2 Medicine
Diabetes Therapy Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-21 DOI:10.1007/s13300-024-01601-x
Man Wu, Fangting Guo, Xiaowei He, Dayin Zheng, Weiqian Ye, Shaobin Li, Zhihua Lin, Fengxiong Wang
{"title":"Analysis of Distribution and Drug Susceptibility Test Results of Pathogenic Bacteria in Diabetic Foot Ulcers.","authors":"Man Wu, Fangting Guo, Xiaowei He, Dayin Zheng, Weiqian Ye, Shaobin Li, Zhihua Lin, Fengxiong Wang","doi":"10.1007/s13300-024-01601-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study aimed to determine the pathogen distribution and drug susceptibility of diabetic foot wound secretions in a tertiary hospital in a coastal area of southeastern China to guide clinical antibiotic selection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on 212 patients with diabetic foot hospitalized at Xiamen Third Hospital from 2018 to 2023, and foot wound secretions were collected for microbial culture and drug susceptibility testing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 212 cases of patients with diabetic foot wound secretions, 163 cases (76.9%) were cultured with pathogenic bacteria, and a total of 207 strains of pathogenic bacteria were cultured, including 75 strains (36.23%) of Gram-positive (G+) bacteria, 118 strains of Gram-negative (G-) bacteria (57.00%), 14 strains of fungi (6.76%), 120 cases of single microorganism infection (73.62%), 43 cases of mixed infection (26.38%), and 15 strains of multidrug-resistant bacteria (7.25%). The top three pathogenic bacteria were Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. G+ bacteria were dominated by S. aureus. Drug susceptibility results showed that G+ bacteria were highly susceptible to vancomycin, linezolid, tigecycline, quinupristin/dalfopristin, rifampicin, and furotoxin, and somewhat resistant to penicillin, erythromycin, clindamycin, and cefoxitin. Among G- bacterial infections, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli, and Proteus were the major species. Drug susceptibility testing indicated that carbapenems such as imipenem and ertapenem were the most effective antibacterial drugs against G- strains, followed by amikacin, piperacillin, and tazabactams to which these bacteria were also relatively sensitive, while resistance to penicillins and first-generation cephalosporins increased significantly. We isolated one strain of pathogenic bacteria from a Wagner grade 1 ulcer, which was G+ bacteria. In Wagner grade 2 ulcers, the distribution of pathogenic bacteria was mainly G+ bacteria. In Wagner grade 3 and 4 ulcers, the distribution of pathogenic bacteria was mainly G- bacteria, and the increased rate of mixed infection was mainly due to mixed infection of G+ and G-. Two strains of pathogenic bacteria were isolated at Wagner grade 5, which were mixed infections of G+ and G-.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Pathogenic bacteria in diabetic foot wounds are predominantly G- bacteria, followed by G+ bacteria. As the Wagner ulcer grade increases, the distribution of pathogenic bacteria changes from G+ bacteria to G- bacteria, and the mixed infection rate increases. G+ bacteria are highly susceptible to vancomycin, linezolid, tigecycline, quinupristin/dalfopristin, rifampicin, and furotoxin, and somewhat resistant to penicillin, erythromycin, clindamycin, and cefoxitin. G- bacteria are more sensitive to the antimicrobial drugs ertapenem, imipenem, amikacin, piperacillin tazobactam, and have high resistance to penicillin and first-generation cephalosporins.</p>","PeriodicalId":11192,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11211311/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13300-024-01601-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: This study aimed to determine the pathogen distribution and drug susceptibility of diabetic foot wound secretions in a tertiary hospital in a coastal area of southeastern China to guide clinical antibiotic selection.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 212 patients with diabetic foot hospitalized at Xiamen Third Hospital from 2018 to 2023, and foot wound secretions were collected for microbial culture and drug susceptibility testing.

Results: Among 212 cases of patients with diabetic foot wound secretions, 163 cases (76.9%) were cultured with pathogenic bacteria, and a total of 207 strains of pathogenic bacteria were cultured, including 75 strains (36.23%) of Gram-positive (G+) bacteria, 118 strains of Gram-negative (G-) bacteria (57.00%), 14 strains of fungi (6.76%), 120 cases of single microorganism infection (73.62%), 43 cases of mixed infection (26.38%), and 15 strains of multidrug-resistant bacteria (7.25%). The top three pathogenic bacteria were Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. G+ bacteria were dominated by S. aureus. Drug susceptibility results showed that G+ bacteria were highly susceptible to vancomycin, linezolid, tigecycline, quinupristin/dalfopristin, rifampicin, and furotoxin, and somewhat resistant to penicillin, erythromycin, clindamycin, and cefoxitin. Among G- bacterial infections, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli, and Proteus were the major species. Drug susceptibility testing indicated that carbapenems such as imipenem and ertapenem were the most effective antibacterial drugs against G- strains, followed by amikacin, piperacillin, and tazabactams to which these bacteria were also relatively sensitive, while resistance to penicillins and first-generation cephalosporins increased significantly. We isolated one strain of pathogenic bacteria from a Wagner grade 1 ulcer, which was G+ bacteria. In Wagner grade 2 ulcers, the distribution of pathogenic bacteria was mainly G+ bacteria. In Wagner grade 3 and 4 ulcers, the distribution of pathogenic bacteria was mainly G- bacteria, and the increased rate of mixed infection was mainly due to mixed infection of G+ and G-. Two strains of pathogenic bacteria were isolated at Wagner grade 5, which were mixed infections of G+ and G-.

Conclusions: Pathogenic bacteria in diabetic foot wounds are predominantly G- bacteria, followed by G+ bacteria. As the Wagner ulcer grade increases, the distribution of pathogenic bacteria changes from G+ bacteria to G- bacteria, and the mixed infection rate increases. G+ bacteria are highly susceptible to vancomycin, linezolid, tigecycline, quinupristin/dalfopristin, rifampicin, and furotoxin, and somewhat resistant to penicillin, erythromycin, clindamycin, and cefoxitin. G- bacteria are more sensitive to the antimicrobial drugs ertapenem, imipenem, amikacin, piperacillin tazobactam, and have high resistance to penicillin and first-generation cephalosporins.

Abstract Image

糖尿病足溃疡中致病菌的分布和药敏试验结果分析
简介:本研究旨在确定中国东南沿海地区一家三甲医院糖尿病足伤口分泌物的病原体分布和药物敏感性:本研究旨在确定中国东南沿海地区一家三甲医院糖尿病足伤口分泌物的病原体分布和药物敏感性,以指导临床抗生素的选择:对厦门市第三医院2018年至2023年住院的212例糖尿病足患者进行回顾性分析,收集足部伤口分泌物进行微生物培养和药敏试验:212例糖尿病足患者伤口分泌物中,培养出致病菌163例(76.9%),共培养出致病菌207株,其中革兰阳性菌75株(36.其中革兰阳性菌(G+)75株(36.23%),革兰阴性菌(G-)118株(57.00%),真菌14株(6.76%),单一微生物感染120例(73.62%),混合感染43例(26.38%),多重耐药菌15株(7.25%)。前三位致病菌分别是金黄色葡萄球菌、肺炎克雷伯菌和铜绿假单胞菌。G+ 细菌以金黄色葡萄球菌为主。药敏结果显示,G+细菌对万古霉素、利奈唑胺、替加环素、奎奴普汀/达尔福普汀、利福平和呋喃妥因高度敏感,对青霉素、红霉素、克林霉素和头孢西丁有一定耐药性。在 G 型细菌感染中,肺炎克雷伯菌、铜绿假单胞菌、大肠埃希菌和变形杆菌是主要菌种。药敏试验表明,亚胺培南和厄他培南等碳青霉烯类是对 G- 菌株最有效的抗菌药物,其次是阿米卡星、哌拉西林和他扎巴坦类,这些细菌对这些药物也相对敏感,而对青霉素类和第一代头孢菌素的耐药性则明显增加。我们从瓦格纳一级溃疡中分离出一株致病菌,为 G+ 细菌。在瓦格纳 2 级溃疡中,致病菌的分布主要是 G+ 细菌。在瓦格纳 3 级和 4 级溃疡中,病原菌的分布主要是 G- 细菌,混合感染率的增加主要是由于 G+ 和 G- 的混合感染。瓦格纳5级溃疡分离出两株致病菌,为G+和G-混合感染:结论:糖尿病足伤口中的致病菌主要是 G- 细菌,其次是 G+ 细菌。随着瓦格纳溃疡等级的增加,致病菌的分布从 G+ 菌变为 G- 菌,混合感染率增加。G+ 细菌对万古霉素、利奈唑胺、替加环素、奎奴普汀/达尔福普汀、利福平和呋喃妥因高度敏感,对青霉素、红霉素、克林霉素和头孢西丁有一定耐药性。G- 细菌对抗菌药物厄他培南、亚胺培南、阿米卡星、哌拉西林他唑巴坦更为敏感,对青霉素和第一代头孢菌素的耐药性较强。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Diabetes Therapy
Diabetes Therapy Medicine-Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
7.90%
发文量
130
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Diabetes Therapy is an international, peer reviewed, rapid-publication (peer review in 2 weeks, published 3–4 weeks from acceptance) journal dedicated to the publication of high-quality clinical (all phases), observational, real-world, and health outcomes research around the discovery, development, and use of therapeutics and interventions (including devices) across all areas of diabetes. Studies relating to diagnostics and diagnosis, pharmacoeconomics, public health, epidemiology, quality of life, and patient care, management, and education are also encouraged. The journal is of interest to a broad audience of healthcare professionals and publishes original research, reviews, communications and letters. The journal is read by a global audience and receives submissions from all over the world. Diabetes Therapy will consider all scientifically sound research be it positive, confirmatory or negative data. Submissions are welcomed whether they relate to an international and/or a country-specific audience, something that is crucially important when researchers are trying to target more specific patient populations. This inclusive approach allows the journal to assist in the dissemination of all scientifically and ethically sound research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信