Assessment of probiotic intervention for control of biofilm former Escherichia coli isolates of animal-origin foods

IF 1.9 4区 农林科学 Q4 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Manjeet Sharan, Pankaj Dhaka, Jasbir Singh Bedi, Nitin Mehta, Randhir Singh
{"title":"Assessment of probiotic intervention for control of biofilm former Escherichia coli isolates of animal-origin foods","authors":"Manjeet Sharan,&nbsp;Pankaj Dhaka,&nbsp;Jasbir Singh Bedi,&nbsp;Nitin Mehta,&nbsp;Randhir Singh","doi":"10.1111/jfs.13137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The study investigates the efficacy of lactic acid bacteria (LAB) strains (<i>Lactobacillus rhamnosus</i> and <i>Lactobacillus casei</i>) in combating <i>Escherichia coli</i> biofilms by determining antibacterial, anti-biofilm activity, auto-aggregation, and co-aggregation assay. The study included 115 <i>E. coli</i> isolates from milk (<i>n</i> = 36), chicken meat (<i>n</i> = 33), and chicken eggs (<i>n</i> = 46). Among 115 <i>E. coli</i> isolates, 22.61% were strong biofilm formers. The LAB strain, <i>L. rhamnosus</i> exhibited a 28.47 mm mean antibacterial inhibition zone, an average reduction of 51.22% in biofilm growth, 55.46% auto-aggregation, and 41.57% co-aggregation with <i>E. coli</i>. Similarly, <i>L. casei</i> demonstrated a 21.55 mm mean antibacterial inhibition zone, an average reduction of 36.74% in biofilm growth, 45.23% auto-aggregation, and 38.74% co-aggregation with <i>E. coli</i> isolates. Both strains individually and in combination demonstrate substantial reductions in biofilm growth, with <i>L. rhamnosus</i> observed to be more effective than <i>L. casei.</i> Scanning electron microscopy provides valuable insights into the structural aspects of the probiotic impact on diminishing <i>E. coli</i> biofilm. Probiotics' ability to auto-aggregate and co-aggregate with pathogenic strains serves as an initial screening method for identifying suitable probiotic bacteria. In conclusion, the results underscore the efficacy of specific LAB strains in combating <i>E. coli</i> biofilm formation. This study provides a basis for future investigations into LAB's capacity to mitigate biofilm-related hurdles and strengthen microbial management protocols within food processing settings or relevant food substrates.</p>","PeriodicalId":15814,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Food Safety","volume":"44 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Food Safety","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jfs.13137","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study investigates the efficacy of lactic acid bacteria (LAB) strains (Lactobacillus rhamnosus and Lactobacillus casei) in combating Escherichia coli biofilms by determining antibacterial, anti-biofilm activity, auto-aggregation, and co-aggregation assay. The study included 115 E. coli isolates from milk (n = 36), chicken meat (n = 33), and chicken eggs (n = 46). Among 115 E. coli isolates, 22.61% were strong biofilm formers. The LAB strain, L. rhamnosus exhibited a 28.47 mm mean antibacterial inhibition zone, an average reduction of 51.22% in biofilm growth, 55.46% auto-aggregation, and 41.57% co-aggregation with E. coli. Similarly, L. casei demonstrated a 21.55 mm mean antibacterial inhibition zone, an average reduction of 36.74% in biofilm growth, 45.23% auto-aggregation, and 38.74% co-aggregation with E. coli isolates. Both strains individually and in combination demonstrate substantial reductions in biofilm growth, with L. rhamnosus observed to be more effective than L. casei. Scanning electron microscopy provides valuable insights into the structural aspects of the probiotic impact on diminishing E. coli biofilm. Probiotics' ability to auto-aggregate and co-aggregate with pathogenic strains serves as an initial screening method for identifying suitable probiotic bacteria. In conclusion, the results underscore the efficacy of specific LAB strains in combating E. coli biofilm formation. This study provides a basis for future investigations into LAB's capacity to mitigate biofilm-related hurdles and strengthen microbial management protocols within food processing settings or relevant food substrates.

评估益生菌干预对动物源性食品中生物膜前大肠埃希氏菌分离物的控制作用
本研究通过抗菌、抗生物膜活性、自动聚集和共聚集试验,探讨了乳酸菌(LAB)菌株(鼠李糖乳杆菌和干酪乳杆菌)在对抗大肠埃希菌生物膜方面的功效。研究包括从牛奶(36 个)、鸡肉(33 个)和鸡蛋(46 个)中分离出的 115 个大肠杆菌。在 115 株大肠杆菌分离物中,22.61%具有很强的生物膜形成能力。鼠李糖 LAB 菌株的平均抑菌区为 28.47 毫米,生物膜生长平均减少 51.22%,自动聚集率为 55.46%,与大肠杆菌共同聚集率为 41.57%。同样,干酪乳杆菌的平均抑菌区为 21.55 毫米,生物膜生长平均减少 36.74%,自动聚集 45.23%,与大肠杆菌分离物的共同聚集 38.74%。这两种菌株单独或混合使用都能显著减少生物膜的生长,其中鼠李糖酵母菌比干酪乳杆菌更有效。扫描电子显微镜为深入了解益生菌对减少大肠杆菌生物膜的结构影响提供了宝贵的资料。益生菌的自动聚集能力以及与致病菌株共同聚集的能力可作为识别合适益生菌的初步筛选方法。总之,研究结果强调了特定 LAB 菌株在抑制大肠杆菌生物膜形成方面的功效。这项研究为今后研究 LAB 缓解生物膜相关障碍的能力以及加强食品加工环境或相关食品基质中的微生物管理协议奠定了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Food Safety
Journal of Food Safety 工程技术-生物工程与应用微生物
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
69
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Food Safety emphasizes mechanistic studies involving inhibition, injury, and metabolism of food poisoning microorganisms, as well as the regulation of growth and toxin production in both model systems and complex food substrates. It also focuses on pathogens which cause food-borne illness, helping readers understand the factors affecting the initial detection of parasites, their development, transmission, and methods of control and destruction.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信