Bioactive compounds as therapeutic proposals against Plasmodium falciparum: A systematic review

IF 1.4 4区 生物学 Q4 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Diemer Muñoz-Verbel , Jorge Mendoza-Galiz , Eutimio Cueto-Almeida , Elías Romero-Cueto , Escarleth Contreras-Puentes , Neyder Contreras-Puentes
{"title":"Bioactive compounds as therapeutic proposals against Plasmodium falciparum: A systematic review","authors":"Diemer Muñoz-Verbel ,&nbsp;Jorge Mendoza-Galiz ,&nbsp;Eutimio Cueto-Almeida ,&nbsp;Elías Romero-Cueto ,&nbsp;Escarleth Contreras-Puentes ,&nbsp;Neyder Contreras-Puentes","doi":"10.1016/j.bse.2024.104848","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Malaria, transmitted by infected female mosquitoes, is caused by protozoan parasites, of which <em>Plasmodium falciparum</em> is the main species causing clinical manifestations. Malaria affects 87 tropical countries and, according to the World Malaria Report 2021, an estimated 241 million cases of malaria in 2020 led to about 627,000 deaths. Pharmacological treatment is essential to control the morbidity and mortality associated with the clinical manifestation of this disease. However, the excessive deployment of antimalarial drugs has led to drug resistance, which poses a serious threat to public health. Given the reduced discovery and development of new antimalarial drugs the use of specialised plant metabolites is considered a promising strategy to propose new mechanisms and investigate their efficacy in animal and human models. This is a systematic review of several studies, carried out according to the guidelines of the PRISMA statement. The studies were identified in various databases, including EBSCO, Pubmed (MEDLINE), Science Direct, SAGE, Scopus, and Web of Sciences. Eligible studies had to demonstrate the compounds’ ability to inhibit P. falciparum strains through biological activity. Four independent reviewers extracted information from the included studies, and two independent reviewers assessed the risk of bias using the CASP systematic review checklist. A total of 2541 studies were initially identified, of which 147 were selected for full-text reading. Of these, studies met the eligibility criteria. The eligible studies were conducted between 2018 and 2024 and came from different countries. The quality of the studies was assessed using the CASP tool. This review provides evidence that plant metabolites could be a valuable resource for the development of new antimalarial drugs. This is supported by extraction and identification techniques and by the evaluation of their mechanisms of action.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8799,"journal":{"name":"Biochemical Systematics and Ecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biochemical Systematics and Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305197824000668","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Malaria, transmitted by infected female mosquitoes, is caused by protozoan parasites, of which Plasmodium falciparum is the main species causing clinical manifestations. Malaria affects 87 tropical countries and, according to the World Malaria Report 2021, an estimated 241 million cases of malaria in 2020 led to about 627,000 deaths. Pharmacological treatment is essential to control the morbidity and mortality associated with the clinical manifestation of this disease. However, the excessive deployment of antimalarial drugs has led to drug resistance, which poses a serious threat to public health. Given the reduced discovery and development of new antimalarial drugs the use of specialised plant metabolites is considered a promising strategy to propose new mechanisms and investigate their efficacy in animal and human models. This is a systematic review of several studies, carried out according to the guidelines of the PRISMA statement. The studies were identified in various databases, including EBSCO, Pubmed (MEDLINE), Science Direct, SAGE, Scopus, and Web of Sciences. Eligible studies had to demonstrate the compounds’ ability to inhibit P. falciparum strains through biological activity. Four independent reviewers extracted information from the included studies, and two independent reviewers assessed the risk of bias using the CASP systematic review checklist. A total of 2541 studies were initially identified, of which 147 were selected for full-text reading. Of these, studies met the eligibility criteria. The eligible studies were conducted between 2018 and 2024 and came from different countries. The quality of the studies was assessed using the CASP tool. This review provides evidence that plant metabolites could be a valuable resource for the development of new antimalarial drugs. This is supported by extraction and identification techniques and by the evaluation of their mechanisms of action.

作为恶性疟原虫治疗建议的生物活性化合物:系统综述
疟疾由受感染的雌蚊传播,由原生动物寄生虫引起,其中恶性疟原虫是引起临床表现的主要种类。疟疾影响着 87 个热带国家,根据《2021 年世界疟疾报告》,2020 年估计有 2.41 亿疟疾病例,导致约 62.7 万人死亡。药物治疗对于控制与该疾病临床表现相关的发病率和死亡率至关重要。然而,抗疟药物的过度使用导致了耐药性的产生,对公共卫生构成了严重威胁。鉴于新抗疟药物的发现和开发减少,使用专门的植物代谢物被认为是提出新机制并在动物和人体模型中研究其疗效的一种有前途的策略。本文是根据 PRISMA 声明的指导原则对多项研究进行的系统性综述。这些研究是在各种数据库(包括 EBSCO、Pubmed (MEDLINE)、Science Direct、SAGE、Scopus 和 Web of Sciences)中找到的。符合条件的研究必须证明化合物具有通过生物活性抑制恶性疟原虫菌株的能力。四位独立审稿人提取了纳入研究的信息,两位独立审稿人使用 CASP 系统性综述清单评估了偏倚风险。最初共确定了 2541 项研究,其中 147 项被选中进行全文阅读。其中,有研究符合资格标准。符合条件的研究在 2018 年至 2024 年期间进行,来自不同的国家。研究质量采用 CASP 工具进行评估。本综述提供的证据表明,植物代谢物可能是开发新型抗疟药物的宝贵资源。提取和鉴定技术以及对其作用机理的评估为这一观点提供了支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biochemical Systematics and Ecology
Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 生物-进化生物学
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
147
审稿时长
43 days
期刊介绍: Biochemical Systematics and Ecology is devoted to the publication of original papers and reviews, both submitted and invited, in two subject areas: I) the application of biochemistry to problems relating to systematic biology of organisms (biochemical systematics); II) the role of biochemistry in interactions between organisms or between an organism and its environment (biochemical ecology). In the Biochemical Systematics subject area, comparative studies of the distribution of (secondary) metabolites within a wider taxon (e.g. genus or family) are welcome. Comparative studies, encompassing multiple accessions of each of the taxa within their distribution are particularly encouraged. Welcome are also studies combining classical chemosystematic studies (such as comparative HPLC-MS or GC-MS investigations) with (macro-) molecular phylogenetic studies. Studies that involve the comparative use of compounds to help differentiate among species such as adulterants or substitutes that illustrate the applied use of chemosystematics are welcome. In contrast, studies solely employing macromolecular phylogenetic techniques (gene sequences, RAPD studies etc.) will be considered out of scope. Discouraged are manuscripts that report known or new compounds from a single source taxon without addressing a systematic hypothesis. Also considered out of scope are studies using outdated and hard to reproduce macromolecular techniques such as RAPDs in combination with standard chemosystematic techniques such as GC-FID and GC-MS.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信